22 research outputs found

    Genetic diversity within and between British and Irish breeds: the maternal and paternal history of native ponies.

    Get PDF
    The UK and Ireland have many native pony breeds with historical and cultural importance as well as being a source of uncharacterized genetic diversity. However, there is a lack of comprehensive research investigating their genetic diversity and phylogenetic interrelationships. Many studies contain a limited number of pony breeds or small sample sizes for these breeds. This may result in erroneous grouping of pony breeds that otherwise have intricate interrelationships with each other and are not evaluated correctly when placed as a token subset of a larger dataset. This is the first study that specifically investigates the genetic diversity within and between British and Irish native pony breeds using large sample numbers from locations of their native origin. This study used a panel of microsatellite markers and sequence analysis of the mitochondrial control region to analyze the genetic diversity within and between 11 pony breeds from Britain and Ireland. A large dataset was collected (a total of 485 animals were used for mtDNA analysis and 450 for microsatellite analysis), and previously published data were used to place the British and Irish ponies in a global context. The native ponies of Britain and Ireland were found to have had a complex history, and the interrelationships between the breeds were revealed. Overall, high levels of genetic diversity were maintained in native breeds, although some reduction was evident in small or isolated populations (Shetland, Carneddau, and Section C). Unusual mitochondrial diversity distribution patterns were apparent for the Carneddau and Dartmoor, although among breeds and global haplogroups there was a high degree of haplotype sharing evident, well-represented within British and Irish ponies. Ancestral maternal diversity was maintained by most populations, particularly the Fells and Welsh ponies, which exhibited rare and ancient lineages. The maternal and paternal histories of the breeds are distinct, with male-biased crossings between native breeds, and other shared influences, likely Arabs and Thoroughbreds, are apparent. The data generated herein provide valuable information to guide and implement the conservation of increasingly rare native genetic resources

    Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: A safe and efficacious vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), if deployed with high coverage, could contribute to the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in a pooled interim analysis of four trials. METHODS: This analysis includes data from four ongoing blinded, randomised, controlled trials done across the UK, Brazil, and South Africa. Participants aged 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conjugate vaccine or saline). Participants in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group received two doses containing 5 × 1010 viral particles (standard dose; SD/SD cohort); a subset in the UK trial received a half dose as their first dose (low dose) and a standard dose as their second dose (LD/SD cohort). The primary efficacy analysis included symptomatic COVID-19 in seronegative participants with a nucleic acid amplification test-positive swab more than 14 days after a second dose of vaccine. Participants were analysed according to treatment received, with data cutoff on Nov 4, 2020. Vaccine efficacy was calculated as 1 - relative risk derived from a robust Poisson regression model adjusted for age. Studies are registered at ISRCTN89951424 and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04324606, NCT04400838, and NCT04444674. FINDINGS: Between April 23 and Nov 4, 2020, 23 848 participants were enrolled and 11 636 participants (7548 in the UK, 4088 in Brazil) were included in the interim primary efficacy analysis. In participants who received two standard doses, vaccine efficacy was 62·1% (95% CI 41·0-75·7; 27 [0·6%] of 4440 in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group vs71 [1·6%] of 4455 in the control group) and in participants who received a low dose followed by a standard dose, efficacy was 90·0% (67·4-97·0; three [0·2%] of 1367 vs 30 [2·2%] of 1374; pinteraction=0·010). Overall vaccine efficacy across both groups was 70·4% (95·8% CI 54·8-80·6; 30 [0·5%] of 5807 vs 101 [1·7%] of 5829). From 21 days after the first dose, there were ten cases hospitalised for COVID-19, all in the control arm; two were classified as severe COVID-19, including one death. There were 74 341 person-months of safety follow-up (median 3·4 months, IQR 1·3-4·8): 175 severe adverse events occurred in 168 participants, 84 events in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 91 in the control group. Three events were classified as possibly related to a vaccine: one in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group, one in the control group, and one in a participant who remains masked to group allocation. INTERPRETATION: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 has an acceptable safety profile and has been found to be efficacious against symptomatic COVID-19 in this interim analysis of ongoing clinical trials. FUNDING: UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes for Health Research (NIHR), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Lemann Foundation, Rede D'Or, Brava and Telles Foundation, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland's NIHR Clinical Research Network, and AstraZeneca

    Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK

    Get PDF
    Background A safe and efficacious vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), if deployed with high coverage, could contribute to the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in a pooled interim analysis of four trials. Methods This analysis includes data from four ongoing blinded, randomised, controlled trials done across the UK, Brazil, and South Africa. Participants aged 18 years and older were randomly assigned (1:1) to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine or control (meningococcal group A, C, W, and Y conjugate vaccine or saline). Participants in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group received two doses containing 5 × 1010 viral particles (standard dose; SD/SD cohort); a subset in the UK trial received a half dose as their first dose (low dose) and a standard dose as their second dose (LD/SD cohort). The primary efficacy analysis included symptomatic COVID-19 in seronegative participants with a nucleic acid amplification test-positive swab more than 14 days after a second dose of vaccine. Participants were analysed according to treatment received, with data cutoff on Nov 4, 2020. Vaccine efficacy was calculated as 1 - relative risk derived from a robust Poisson regression model adjusted for age. Studies are registered at ISRCTN89951424 and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04324606, NCT04400838, and NCT04444674. Findings Between April 23 and Nov 4, 2020, 23 848 participants were enrolled and 11 636 participants (7548 in the UK, 4088 in Brazil) were included in the interim primary efficacy analysis. In participants who received two standard doses, vaccine efficacy was 62·1% (95% CI 41·0–75·7; 27 [0·6%] of 4440 in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group vs71 [1·6%] of 4455 in the control group) and in participants who received a low dose followed by a standard dose, efficacy was 90·0% (67·4–97·0; three [0·2%] of 1367 vs 30 [2·2%] of 1374; pinteraction=0·010). Overall vaccine efficacy across both groups was 70·4% (95·8% CI 54·8–80·6; 30 [0·5%] of 5807 vs 101 [1·7%] of 5829). From 21 days after the first dose, there were ten cases hospitalised for COVID-19, all in the control arm; two were classified as severe COVID-19, including one death. There were 74 341 person-months of safety follow-up (median 3·4 months, IQR 1·3–4·8): 175 severe adverse events occurred in 168 participants, 84 events in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 91 in the control group. Three events were classified as possibly related to a vaccine: one in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group, one in the control group, and one in a participant who remains masked to group allocation. Interpretation ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 has an acceptable safety profile and has been found to be efficacious against symptomatic COVID-19 in this interim analysis of ongoing clinical trials

    The Mediator subunit MDT-15 acts downstream of the p38 MAP kinase PMK-1 to regulate the induction of <i>F08G5.6</i> and <i>F35E12.5</i>.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Wild-type or <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> mutant synchronized L1 animals containing the <i>pF08G5.6::GFP</i> immune reporter were grown on vector control (L4440), <i>vhp-1</i>(RNAi) or a combination of <i>vhp-1(RNAi)</i> and <i>pmk-1(RNAi)</i> bacteria and then transferred as L4 animals to PA14 for 18 hours. Animals were photographed under the same imaging conditions. (B) qRT-PCR was used to examine the expression levels of <i>F08G5.6</i>, <i>F35E12.5</i> and <i>C32H11.1</i> in wild-type N2 and <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> mutant animals exposed to <i>vhp-1(RNAi)</i> or the vector control (L4440) under basal conditions (as described above) and 8 hours after exposure to <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. Knockdown of <i>vhp-1</i> caused significant induction of <i>F08G5.6</i> and <i>F35E12.5</i> in wild-type N2 animals (<i>p</i><0.001), but not in <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> animals (<i>p</i>>0.05), under baseline (<i>E. coli</i>) and pathogen-induced conditions. The expression of <i>C32H11.1</i> was significantly induced by <i>vhp-1(RNAi)</i> (<i>p</i><0.001) in an <i>mdt-15</i>-dependent manner under baseline conditions (<i>p</i><0.001), but not following exposure to <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. Data are the average of two biological replicates each normalized to a control gene with error bars representing SEM and are presented as the value relative to the average expression of the indicated gene in the baseline condition (L4440 animals exposed to <i>E. coli</i>).</p

    MDT-15 is required for defense against <i>P. aeruginosa</i> infection.

    No full text
    <p>A <i>P. aeruginosa</i> pathogenesis assay with wild-type N2, <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> mutant worms and <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> animals carrying <i>pmdt-15::mdt-15</i> (three independent lines <i>agEx116</i>, <i>agEx117</i> and <i>agEx118</i>) is shown. The difference in <i>P. aeruginosa</i> susceptibility between <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> animals and each of the three transgenic lines carrying <i>pmdt-15::mdt-15</i> is significant, as is the survival difference between N2 and <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> animals (<i>p</i><0.001). For sample sizes, see <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004143#ppat.1004143.s009" target="_blank">Table S3</a>.</p

    Protection from the toxic effects of the xenobiotic RPW-24 requires MDT-15, but not PMK-1.

    No full text
    <p>(A) The thirteen xenobiotic detoxification genes that were induced 4-fold or greater by RPW-24 in the NanoString nCounter gene expression analysis are presented. The top panel compares the RPW-24-mediated induction of these genes in vector control (L4440) and <i>mdt-15(RNAi)</i> animals, and the bottom panel shows these data for wild-type N2 versus <i>pmk-1(km25)</i> animals, as described in the legend for <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004143#ppat-1004143-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2</a>. * <i>p</i><0.05 for the comparison of the RPW-24-induced conditions. (B) Vector control (L4440), <i>mdt-15(RNAi)</i> and <i>pmk-1(RNAi)</i> animals were exposed to 70 µM RPW-24 or the solvent control DMSO from the L1 stage and photographed after 70 hours of development at 20°C. See <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004143#ppat.1004143.s004" target="_blank">Figure S4</a> for the quantification data from this experiment.</p

    The Mediator subunit MDT-15 regulates the induction of some, but not all, immune genes during <i>P. aeruginosa</i> infection.

    No full text
    <p>The expression of putative <i>C. elegans</i> immune effectors was analyzed by qRT-PCR in vector control (L4440) and <i>mdt-15(RNAi)</i> animals exposed to <i>P. aeruginosa</i> and the negative control <i>E. coli</i> OP50 for 8 hours. Data are the average of three replicates each normalized to a control gene with error bars representing SEM and are presented as the value relative to the average expression from all three replicates of the indicated gene in the baseline condition (L4440 animals exposed to <i>E. coli</i>). <i>mdt-15</i> expression was significantly knocked down by <i>mdt-15(RNAi)</i> in these experiments (<i>p</i><0.001).</p

    Resistance to <i>P. aeruginosa</i> phenazine toxins requires MDT-15.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Wild-type N2, <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> and <i>pmk-1(km25)</i> animals were tested in the toxic phenazine <i>P. aeruginosa</i> pathogenesis assay (also called “fast killing” assay). <i>C. elegans</i> young adult animals were exposed to wild-type (WT) <i>P. aeruginosa</i>, <i>P. aeruginosa</i> carrying a deletion in both of the phenazine biosynthetic operons (<i>Δphz</i>) or <i>E. coli</i> OP50. The difference between <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> and N2 animals exposed to <i>P. aeruginosa</i> WT is significant (<i>p</i><0.001), as is the difference in <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> animals exposed to <i>P. aeruginosa</i> WT and <i>P. aeruginosa Δphz (p</i><0.001). There is no significant difference in <i>pmk-1(km25)</i> animals exposed to <i>P. aeruginosa</i> WT and <i>P. aeruginosa Δphz</i> (<i>p</i>>0.05). This assay is representative of two independent experiments. <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004143#ppat.1004143.s006" target="_blank">Figure S6A</a> presents the control condition for this experiment showing that both <i>C. elegans</i> N2 and <i>mdt-15(tm2182)</i> at the L4 stage are sensitive to toxic phenazine-mediated killing (<i>p</i><0.001). (B) Vector control (L4440), <i>mdt-15(RNAi)</i> and <i>pmk-1(RNAi)</i> animals were exposed to high osmolarity “fast kill” media (pH 5) with <i>E. coli</i> as the food source in the presence or absence of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid and 1-hydroxyphenazine (labeled “toxic phenazines” above) at the approximate concentrations produced by <i>P. aeruginosa</i> under standard assay conditions. The difference in killing between <i>mdt-15(RNAi)</i> animals exposed to toxic phenazines and the other conditions is significant (<i>p</i><0.001). See also <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004143#ppat.1004143.s006" target="_blank">Figure S6</a>. For sample sizes, see <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004143#ppat.1004143.s009" target="_blank">Table S3</a>.</p
    corecore