Are Endothelial Progenitor Cells the Real Solution for Cardiovascular Diseases? Focus on Controversies and Perspectives

Advanced knowledge in the field of stem cell biology and their ability to provide a cue for counteracting several diseases are leading numerous researchers to focus their attention on \u201cregenerative medicine\u201d as possible solutions for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, the lack of consistent evidence in this arena has hampered the clinical application. The same condition affects the research on endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), creating more confusion than comprehension. In this review, this aspect is discussed with particular emphasis. In particular, we describe biology and physiology of EPCs, outline their clinical relevance as both new predictive, diagnostic, and prognostic CVD biomarkers and therapeutic agents, discuss advantages, disadvantages, and conflicting data about their use as possible solutions for vascular impairment and clinical applications, and finally underline a very crucial aspect of EPCs \u201ccharacterization and definition,\u201d which seems to be the real cause of large heterogeneity existing in literature data on this topic

Long-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Analyzing the Role of Systematic Pre-operative Coronary Angiography before Elective Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease

ObjectivesTo evaluate the potential benefit of systematic preoperative coronary-artery angiography followed by selective coronary-artery revascularization on the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) without a previous history of coronary artery disease (CAD).MethodsWe randomised 426 patients who were candidates for CEA, with no history of CAD, a normal electrocardiogram (ECG), and a normal cardiac ultrasound. In group A (n = 216) all patients underwent coronary angiography before CEA. In group B (n = 210) CEA was performed without coronary angiography. Patients were not blinded for relevant assessments during follow-up. Primary end-point was the occurrence of MI at 3.5 years. The secondary end-point was the overall survival rate. Median length of follow-up was 6.2 years.ResultsIn group A, coronary angiography revealed significant coronary artery stenosis in 68 patients (31.5%). Among them, 66 underwent percutaneous Intervention (PCI) prior to CEA and 2 received combined CEA and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). Postoperatively, no MI was observed in group A, whereas 6 MI occurred in group B, one of which was fatal (p = .01).During the study period, 3 MI occurred in group A (1.4%) and 33 were observed in group B (15.7%), 6 of which were fatal. The Cox model demonstrated a reduced risk of MI for patients in group A receiving coronary angiography (HR,.078; 95% CI, 0.024-0.256; p < .001). In addition, patients with diabetes and patients <70 years presented with an increased risk of MI. Survival analysis at 6 years by Kaplan-Meier estimates was 95.6 ± 3.2% in Group A and 89.7 ± 3.7% in group B (Log Rank = 6.54, p = .01).ConclusionsIn asymptomatic coronary-artery patients, systematic coronary angiography prior to CEA followed by selective PCI or CABG significantly reduces the incidence of late MI and increases long-term survival. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02260453)

Postpartum aortic dissection. A case report and review of literature

Introduction: Aortic dissection is a rare cardiovascular complication in pregnancy. Most of the cases occur during the third trimester of pregnancy, whilst 33% of cases are reported during the postpartum period. Presentation of case: We report the case of a multiparous 35-year-old patient with gestational hypertension treated for a type A aortic dissection on the second postpartum day. A review of literature on non-syndromic sporadic aortic dissection during the postpartum period is presented. Discussion: Aortic complications in pregnancy have been described in genetic syndromes or congenital aortic malformations but may also be non -syndromic and occur in the absence of any other risk factor. Pregnancy carries a 25-fold increase in relative risk for dissection. A review of the 16 cases published in literature from 1995 to December 2016 of non-syndromic, sporadic aortic dissections in pregnancy showed that the event may occur more frequently in the first week post-partum, be symptomatic for thoracic pain or dyspnoea. Type A aortic dissection accounts to 75% of cases. Mortality, despite surgical treatment, has been reported in 4 cases. Conclusions: Even though rarely reported, given the increasing incidence and the high mortality of aortic dissection in pregnancy, along with the potential challenge for two lives, clinician must consider aortic dissection in post-partum while dealing with differential diagnosis in post-partum patients in the emergency setting

Undetected acute aortic dissection in a patient referred for primary coronary angioplasty: A successful treatment of perioperative bleeding after abciximab administration

The authors describe a case of an acute aortic dissection in a Japanese woman with long-lasting hypertension, who was referred to our cath lab for primary percutaneous coronary intervention because of an ECG feature of acute inferior myocardial infarction and systemic hypotension. A successful treatment of perioperative bleeding followed a missed diagnosis in the early stages and abciximab administration