2 research outputs found

    Reassessment of <sup>90</sup>Sr, <sup>137</sup>Cs, and <sup>134</sup>Cs in the Coast off Japan Derived from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Accident

    No full text
    The years following the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant (FDNPP) accident, the distribution of <sup>90</sup>Sr in seawater in the coast off Japan has received limited attention. However, <sup>90</sup>Sr is a major contaminant in waters accumulated within the nuclear facility and in the storage tanks. Seawater samples collected off the FDNPP in September 2013 showed radioactive levels significantly higher than pre-Fukushima levels within 6 km off the FDNPP. These samples, with up to 8.9 ± 0.4 Bq·m<sup>–3</sup> for <sup>90</sup>Sr, 124 ± 3 Bq·m<sup>–3</sup> for <sup>137</sup>Cs, and 54 ± 1 Bq·m<sup>–3</sup> for <sup>134</sup>Cs, appear to be influenced by ongoing releases from the FDNPP, with a characteristic <sup>137</sup>Cs/<sup>90</sup>Sr activity ratio of 3.5 ± 0.2. Beach surface water and groundwater collected in Sendai Bay had <sup>137</sup>Cs concentrations of up to 43 ± 1 Bq·m<sup>–3</sup>, while <sup>90</sup>Sr was close to pre-Fukushima levels (1–2 Bq·m<sup>–3</sup>). These samples appear to be influenced by freshwater inputs carrying a <sup>137</sup>Cs/<sup>90</sup>Sr activity ratio closer to that of the FDNPP fallout deposited on land in the spring of 2011. Ongoing inputs of <sup>90</sup>Sr from FDNPP releases would be on the order of 2.3–8.5 GBq·d<sup>–1</sup> in September 2013, likely exceeding river inputs by 2–3 orders of magnitude. These results strongly suggest that a continuous surveillance of artificial radionuclides in the Pacific Ocean is still required

    Potential Releases of <sup>129</sup>I, <sup>236</sup>U, and Pu Isotopes from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plants to the Ocean from 2013 to 2015

    No full text
    After the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident, many efforts were put into the determination of the presence of <sup>137</sup>Cs, <sup>134</sup>Cs, <sup>131</sup>I, and other gamma-emitting radionuclides in the ocean, but minor work was done regarding the monitoring of less volatile radionuclides, pure beta-ray emitters or simply radionuclides with very long half-lives. In this study we document the temporal evolution of <sup>129</sup>I, <sup>236</sup>U, and Pu isotopes (<sup>239</sup>Pu and <sup>240</sup>Pu) in seawater sampled during four different cruises performed 2, 3, and 4 years after the accident, and we compare the results to <sup>137</sup>Cs collected at the same stations and depths. Our results show that concentrations of <sup>129</sup>I are systematically above the nuclear weapon test levels at stations located close to the FDNPP, with a maximum value of 790 × 10<sup>7</sup> at·kg<sup>–1</sup>, that exceeds all previously reported <sup>129</sup>I concentrations in the Pacific Ocean. Yet, the total amount of <sup>129</sup>I released after the accident in the time 2011–2015 was calculated from the <sup>129</sup>I/<sup>137</sup>Cs ratio of the ongoing <sup>137</sup>Cs releases and estimated to be about 100 g (which adds to the 1 kg released during the accident in 2011). No clear evidence of Fukushima-derived <sup>236</sup>U and Pu isotopes has been found in this study, although further monitoring is encouraged to elucidate the origin of the highest <sup>240</sup>Pu/<sup>239</sup>Pu atom ratio of 0.293 ± 0.028 we found close to FDNPP
    corecore