Treatment delays in children and young adults with lymphoma: report from an East Africa Lymphoma Cohort Study

Background: Affordable treatments for lymphoma from the WHO's essential medicine list are available in low-income settings. However, precise diagnosis is often lacking and prolonged time to diagnosis and treatment results in poor treatment outcomes. So far, a detailed analysis of the root causes of the treatment delay is lacking. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at three tertiary cancer hospitals in Tanzania and one cancer centre, St. Mary's Hospital-Lacor Hospital, in Northern Uganda. The study included patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lymphoma. The primary outcome was the median total treatment delay and its components. Total treatment delay was defined as the time taken from the onset of symptoms to receiving definitive cancer treatment. Results: The median age of patients was 12 years (IQR 9-18), and 100 (68%) were males. The median Total Treatment Delay for the entire cohort was 124 days (95% CI 107 - 136). Not started treatment probability for the entire cohort was 64% (95% CI 56-72) at 90 days and 30% (24 - 39) at 180 days. The median Total Treatment Delay for Burkitt lymphoma was 91 days (95% CI 80 - 115), while for DLBCL and Hodgkin lymphoma, it was 114 days (95% CI 84 - 148) and 232 days (95% CI 179 - 305), respectively. Conclusion: Significant treatment delay for lymphoma patients emanates from healthcare system-related factors. Due to delays in referrals from primary care and lack of capacity of pathology in secondary care, initial treatment decisions are still often based on clinical suspicion and urgency

No evidence of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission through transfusion of human blood products: A systematic review

Abstract The presence of viral nucleic material in the circulation poses a theoretical risk of transmission through transfusion. However, little is known about the possibility of the actual transmission through transfusion or transplantation of blood products. A PROSPERO registered systematic review pooled evidence from PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar and CINAHL. The search included studies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) transmission through human blood products. In total 537 studies were extracted, and only eight articles (1.5%) were eligible for the final analysis. A total of 14 patients received blood products from coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) virus‐positive donors, and six (42.9%) tested negative for COVID‐19 RT‐PCR for up to 14 days post‐transfusion/transplantation. There were no documented clinical details on the COVID‐19 test for eight (57.1%) blood products recipients. Of the eight patients, none of them developed any COVID‐19‐related symptoms. In conclusion, there is limited evidence of transfusion transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 via human blood products. Consolidation of further evidence, as it emerges, is warranted

Infrastructure for bioinformatics applications in Tanzania: Lessons from the Sickle Cell Programme

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a common genetic disorder in Africa. Some ongoing work in SCD research includes the analysis and comparisons of variation in phenotypic presentations and disease outcomes with the genotypic signatures. This has contributed to the observed growth of molecular and genetic data in SCD. However, while the “omics” data continues to pile, the capacity to interpret and turn the genetic findings into clinical practice is still underdeveloped, especially in the developing region. Building bioinformatics infrastructure and capacity in the region is key to bridging the gap. This paper seeks to illustrate how the Sickle Cell Programme (SCP) at the Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) in Tanzania, modeled the integration of infrastructure for bioinformatics and clinical research while running day-to-day clinical care for SCD in Tanzania

Acute chest syndrome and COVID‐19 in hydroxyurea naïve sickle cell disease patient in a low resource setting

Abstract Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is a severe complication of sickle cell disease (SCD) and one of the leading causes of mortality in SCD patients. The management of ACS is challenging and requires prompt intervention to halt clinical deterioration. With the outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, which also primarily results in acute respiratory illness, the clinical picture and treatment outcome in SCD patients with ACS remain unknown. We present a case of a 30‐year‐old male who came in with features of painful vaso‐occlusive episode and haemolysis that later evolved to acute chest syndrome. Chest X‐ray showed pneumonic changes and mild bilateral pleural effusion, and nasal Reverse Transcription‐Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT‐PCR) for COVID‐19 test came out positive. He was managed supportively with simple transfusion, antibiotics, dexamethasone and oxygen support with a good clinical outcome. Presenting with non‐specific symptoms and similar respiratory symptoms and signs, the clinical picture of COVID‐19 can prove difficult to discern from that of ACS due to other causes. This report emphasizes a need for a higher index of suspicion whenever a SCD patient presents with symptoms of acute respiratory distress