A Prospective Evaluation of Opioid Utilization After Upper-Extremity Surgical Procedures: Identifying Consumption Patterns and Determining Prescribing Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Although adequate management of postoperative pain with oral analgesics is an important aspect of surgical procedures, inadvertent overprescribing can lead to excess availability of opioids in the community for potential diversion. The purpose of our study was to prospectively evaluate opioid consumption following outpatient upper-extremity surgical procedures to determine opioid utilization patterns and to develop prescribing guidelines. METHODS: All patients undergoing outpatient upper-extremity surgical procedures over a consecutive 6-month period had the following prospective data collected: patient demographic characteristics, surgical details, anesthesia type, and opioid prescription and consumption patterns. Analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons were performed using t tests, with the p value for multiple pairwise tests adjusted by the Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: A total of 1,416 patients with a mean age of 56 years (range, 18 to 93 years) were included in the study. Surgeons prescribed a mean total of 24 pills, and patients reported consuming a mean total of 8.1 pills, resulting in a utilization rate of 34%. Patients undergoing soft-tissue procedures reported requiring fewer opioids (5.1 pills for 2.2 days) compared with fracture surgical procedures (13.0 pills for 4.5 days) or joint procedures (14.5 pills for 5.0 days) (p \u3c 0.001). Patients who underwent wrist surgical procedures required a mean number of 7.5 pills for 3.1 days and those who underwent hand surgical procedures required a mean number of 7.7 pills for 2.9 days, compared with patients who underwent forearm or elbow surgical procedures (11.1 pills) and those who underwent upper arm or shoulder surgical procedures (22.0 pills) (p \u3c 0.01). Procedure type, anatomic location, anesthesia type, age, and type of insurance were also all significantly associated with reported opioid consumption (p \u3c 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, prospective evaluation of postoperative opioid consumption, we found that patients are being prescribed approximately 3 times greater opioid medications than needed following upper-extremity surgical procedures. We have provided general prescribing guidelines, and we recommend that surgeons carefully examine their patients\u27 opioid utilization and consider customizing their opioid prescriptions on the basis of anatomic location and procedure type to prescribe the optimal amount of opioids while avoiding dissemination of excess opioids

Trigger Finger Release Performed Wide Awake: Prospective Comparison of Local Anesthetics

Introduction: Trigger fi­nger (TF) is one of the most common conditions treated by hand surgeons with a lifetime risk up to 10% in patients with diabetes. If conservative management fails, surgical treatment is undertaken, with or without sedation and a tourniquet, via a small incision to release the A1 pulley. A number of local anesthetics are readily available including Lidocaine, Ropivacaine and Marcaine as well as encapsulated formulations thereof such as Exparel. Since it’s approval in 2011, there have been numerous reports of successfully achieving prolonged pain relief with locally injected Exparel after various procedures, but to the best of our knowledge there have been no reports of its use in ambulatory hand surgery. In this study we prospectively evaluated the efficacy of Lidocaine, Marcaine, or bupivacaine with post-operative Exparel in controlling pain, opioid usage, and adverse reactions following TF surgery

Body Image Dissatisfaction as a Motivator for Healthy Lifestyle Change: Is Some Distress Beneficial?

Hypothesizes that body image dissatisfaction is not always a negative process. It is argued that some degree of dissatisfaction may be helpful and necessary to motivate individuals to engage in healthy behaviors such as exercise and restricting fats and calories. The assumption that dissatisfaction with weight is universally deleterious is questioned. It is suggested that to further analyze the role of body image dissatisfaction in eating disorders, one might examine how body dissatisfaction interacts with motivation and participation in healthy behaviors. Theoretical background and empirical support for these hypotheses are offered. The following issues are reviewed: the relationship between body image dissatisfaction and dieting behavior; the public health problem of obesity, body image, and dieting behavior in overweight and obese populations; the research examining the possible beneficial aspects of body image dissatisfaction in predicting weight loss and exercise behavior; and theories from the health psychology literature supporting the notion that distress may serve as a motivating factor for engaging in health behaviors. Implications for this reconceptualization of the hazards of body image dissatisfaction are offered and research directions are discussed

Wound Dehiscence Following Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

PURPOSE: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common upper-extremity compressive neuropathy, and persistent symptoms can necessitate operative treatment. Surgical options include simple decompression and ulnar nerve transposition. The cause of wound dehiscence after surgery is not well known, and the factors leading to the development of these complications have not been previously described. METHODS: Patients undergoing ulnar nerve surgery from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively evaluated for the development of wound dehiscence within 3 months of surgery. There were 295 patients identified who underwent transposition and 1,106 patients who underwent simple decompression. Patient demographics and past medical history were collected to evaluate the risk factors for the development of wound dehiscence. RESULTS: The overall rate of wound dehiscence following surgery was 2.5%. In the simple decompression group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 2.7% (30/1,106), which occurred a mean of 21 days (range, 2-57 days) following surgery. In the transposition group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 1.7% (5/295), which occurred a mean of 20 days (range, 12-32 days) following surgery. The difference in rates of dehiscence between the decompression and transposition groups was not significant. Five patients in the simple decompression group and 1 patient in the transposition group required a secondary surgery for closure of the wound. Age, body mass index, smoking status, and medical comorbidities were not found to contribute to the development of wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Wound dehiscence can occur following both simple decompression and transposition, even after postoperative evaluation demonstrates a healed wound. Surgeons should be aware of this possibility and specifically counsel patients about remaining cautious with, and protective of, their wound for several weeks after surgery. Dehiscence may be related to suboptimal vascularity in the soft tissue envelope in the posteromedial elbow. When it occurs, dehiscence can generally be treated by allowing healing by secondary intention. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV