Splenectomy for splenomegaly and secondary hypersplenism

Splenomegaly and secondary hypersplenism may be associated with acute and chronic infections, autoimmune states, portal hypertension or splenic vein thrombosis, and a number of infiltrative and neoplastic conditions involving the spleen. Our experience and that of others with these various conditions demonstrates that the decision to perform splenectomy should be based on well-defined and often strictly limited indications. Except for idiopathic splenomegaly, the presence and severity of secondary hypersplenism or severely symptomatic splenomegaly should be well documented. In each case, the potential for palliation and known mean duration of expected response must be weighed against the increased morbidity and mortality of splenectomy (as compared to operation for “primary” hypersplenism) . La splénomégalie avec hypersplénisme secondaire relève de multiples causes: infection aigue ou chronique, états autoimmunologiques, hypertension portale, thrombose de la veine splénique, lésions tumorales spléniques. L'expérience de l'auteur qui rejoint celle de nombreux collègues lui permet d'affirmer que les indications de la splénectomie doivent être bien définies et sont strictement limitées. A l'exception de la splénomégalie idiopathique, l'existence et l'intensité de l'hypersplénisme, l'importance des symptomes provoqués par la splénomégalie doivent être aprréciées avec précision. Dans chaque cas le potentiel de la rémission de l'affection et la durée de la rémission doivent être pris en considération en fonction de l'éventuelle morbidité et de l'éventuelle mortalité de la splénectomie (par comparaison avec la splénectomie pour hypersplénisme primaire). Eplenomegalia e hiperesplenismo secundario pueden estar asociados con infecciones agudas y crónicas, estados autoinmunes (síndrome de Felty, lupus eritematoso sistémico), “esplenomegalia congestiva” por hipertensión portal o trombosis de la vena esplénica y con una variedad de entidades de tipo infiltrativo y neoplásico que afectan al bazo (sarcoidosis, enfermedad de Gaucher, varios desórdenes mieloproliferativos y linfomas). Nuestra experiencia, y aquella de otros autores, con tales condiciones demuestra que la decisión de realizar esplenectomía debe estar fundamentada en indicaciones bien definidas y estrictamente limitadas. Excepto en casos de esplenomegalia idiopática, la presencia y severidad del hiperesplenismo secundario o de esplenomegalia severamente sintomática debe ser bien documentada. En cada caso debe determinarse el potencial de paliación y la duración de la respuesta que se espera obtener frente a la incrementada morbilidad y mortalidad de la esplenectomía (en comparación con la operación que se realiza por hiperesplenismo “primario”).Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41318/1/268_2005_Article_BF01655279.pd

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase status and neonatal jaundice.

Neonatal jaundice and its relationship to glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) status of healthy, term Chinese infants was evaluated in 220 G6PD-deficient infants, 26 intermediate infants who were observed for 3 weeks, and 116 normal (control) infants. Each infant was free of isoimmunisation, cephalhaematomas, or contusions. The mode of labour, method of delivery, and type of feeds had no appreciable effect on daily bilirubin levels. "Elevated" physiological jaundice was associated with normal and G6PD-deficient status; there was no increased haemolysis. G6PD-deficient status was associated with jaundice significantly raised especially in the first week of life, and prolonged beyond that of the "elevated" physiological jaundice. Significantly increased though mild haemolysis was observed. Close surveillance is therefore required for G6PD-deficient infants at least for the first week of life, the period of increased risk. With G6PD-intermediate infants, only the usual measures for normal infants are required