Subcutaneous Emphysema of the Orbit after Nose-Blowing

Orbital emphysema after nose-blowing is an uncommon condition and can appear without a trigger. Herein, we reported a case of orbital emphysema after nose-blowing and performed a literature review. A 68-year-old man fell and sustained an injury near his left orbit. No symptoms were noted. He noticed a left periorbital swelling after blowing his nose. Through computed tomography examination, he was diagnosed with subcutaneous emphysema. There are no previous reports that have reviewed the clinical features, need for surgery, and severity of symptoms of subcutaneous emphysema after nasal swallowing due to different factors. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 48 cases by searching PubMed to clarify these issues. Regarding the emphysema trigger, 21 cases had an injury or had previously undergone surgery. In 34 cases, conservative treatment was required, while surgery was selected in the acute phase in 6 cases and after the acute phase as a radical cure in 8 cases. Reduced visual acuity, diplopia, exophthalmos, facial hypoesthesia, and color disorders were noted and were more common among surgical cases. The literature review revealed no association between fracture location and the need for surgery; furthermore, surgery was less required in non-trauma cases, excluding osteoma, than in trauma cases (p = 0.0169). Our study reveals that a strict follow-up examination of visual symptoms is necessary for the first 2 days in cases of subcutaneous emphysema caused by nose blowing after facial trauma

Preventing renal function impairment perioperative carotid endarterectomy: Analysis, new imaging and operative technique

Introduction: Kidney impairment appears to be more common after Carotid artery stenting (CAS) than after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), although few data are available on the CEArelated risk. Therefore, we assessed kidney function in the perioperative CEA period. We also describe our new method for creating useful images without contrast media and an intraoperative CEA technique for preventing renal impairment. Methods: Our study included 244 patients undergoing CEA. We assessed the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the perioperative period, and the endpoint was renal function impairment (RFI: eGFR of more than 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 from the first measurement of eGFR). For patients with prohibited contrast media, we constructed images from computed tomography of the neck and magnetic resonance angiography without contrast media and used an operative technique with a surgical microscope to treat plaques in a high location. Results: The eGFR in the 122 patients undergoing CEA (54.0%) was <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 eGFR at baseline. We found 5 cases of RFI (2.0%), 3 of which were related to contrast media. Three administrations of contrast media was found to be an independent risk factor for RFI. RFI did not occur with any of the procedures performed without contrast media. Conclusion: In perioperative CEA, RFI is rare. Therefore, CEA might be preferable to CAS for preventing RFI. Our new simulation images and our CEA technique for treating plaques in the distal portion of the internal carotid artery might be safe procedures for protecting both cerebral and renal function

Evaluation of Ethyl Violet as an Alternative Dye to Crystal Violet to Visualize the Vessel Wall during Vascular Anastomosis

Crystal violet (CV) ink has been used as a skin marker worldwide. It has been reported to be useful for vessel wall visualization of microvascular anastomoses. Contrastingly, it has been found to be carcinogenic and inhibit migration and proliferation of venous cells. In some countries, its use in the medical field has been restricted. Therefore, it is necessary to consider alternatives to CV. In this present study, we compared the time required for the anastomosis of a 0.8-1 mm diameter vessel in the chicken wrist artery using CV and a CV-free dye (ethyl violet; EV). The surgeon, microscope, and anastomosis microsurgical tools were standardized for comparison. CV and EV were changed for each anastomosis. The same surgeon performed 30 anastomoses using each dye. No visually obvious differences were noted in the vascular transections with CV and EV. As per the results, no statistically significant difference was observed in the time required for anastomosis using CV and EV. EV conforming to California Proposition 65 may be an effective alternative to CV for vascular visualization of microvascular anastomoses. However, further studies on the effectiveness of the EV in clinical cases are needed

Use of a Contest Format for Objective Assessment of Microsurgical Technique: An Observational Study

journal articl

Preliminary Clinical Surgical Experience with Temporary Simultaneous Use of an Endoscope during Exoscopic Neurosurgery: An Observational Study

The use of an endoscope in exoscopic transcranial neurosurgery for skull-base lesions has not yet been investigated. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the advantages, disadvantages, and safety of &ldquo;simultaneous temporary use of an endoscope during exoscopic surgery&rdquo; (exo-endoscopic surgery (EES)). Consecutive exo-endoscopic surgeries performed by experienced neurosurgeons and assistants were analyzed. Surgical complications and time were compared with previous consecutive microsurgeries performed by the same surgeon. A questionnaire survey was conducted on 16 neurosurgeons with experience in both &ldquo;temporary simultaneous use of endoscope during microscopic surgery&rdquo; (micro-endoscopic surgery (MES)) and EES. EES was performed in 18 of 76 exoscopic surgeries, including tumor removal (n = 10), aneurysm clipping (n = 5), and others (n = 3). There were no significant differences in operative time, anesthesia time, or complications from microsurgery by the same operator. According to the questionnaire survey results, compared with MES, EES had a wider field of view due to its lack of an eyepiece, was easier when loading and unloading instruments into and out of the surgical field, and was more suitable for the simultaneous observation of two fields of view. Overall, 79.2% of surgeons indicated that EES may be better suited than MES to simultaneously observe two fields of view

Preliminary Clinical Surgical Experience with Temporary Simultaneous Use of an Endoscope during Exoscopic Neurosurgery: An Observational Study

The use of an endoscope in exoscopic transcranial neurosurgery for skull-base lesions has not yet been investigated. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the advantages, disadvantages, and safety of “simultaneous temporary use of an endoscope during exoscopic surgery” (exo-endoscopic surgery (EES)). Consecutive exo-endoscopic surgeries performed by experienced neurosurgeons and assistants were analyzed. Surgical complications and time were compared with previous consecutive microsurgeries performed by the same surgeon. A questionnaire survey was conducted on 16 neurosurgeons with experience in both “temporary simultaneous use of endoscope during microscopic surgery” (micro-endoscopic surgery (MES)) and EES. EES was performed in 18 of 76 exoscopic surgeries, including tumor removal (n = 10), aneurysm clipping (n = 5), and others (n = 3). There were no significant differences in operative time, anesthesia time, or complications from microsurgery by the same operator. According to the questionnaire survey results, compared with MES, EES had a wider field of view due to its lack of an eyepiece, was easier when loading and unloading instruments into and out of the surgical field, and was more suitable for the simultaneous observation of two fields of view. Overall, 79.2% of surgeons indicated that EES may be better suited than MES to simultaneously observe two fields of view