4 research outputs found

    CSF p-tau/Aβ(42) ratio and brain FDG-PET may reliably detect MCI "imminent" converters to AD.

    Full text link
    peer reviewedPURPOSE: To know whether mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients will develop Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in very short time or remain stable is of crucial importance, also considering new experimental drugs usually tested within very short time frames. Here we combined cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers and a neurodegeneration marker such as brain FDG-PET to define an objective algorithm, suitable not only to reliably detect MCI converters to AD dementia but also to predict timing of conversion. METHODS: We included 77 consecutive MCI patients with neurological/neuropsychological assessment, brain 18F-FDG-PET and CSF analysis available at diagnosis and a neuropsychological/neurological evaluation every 6 months for a medium- to a long-term follow-up (at least 2 and up to 8 years). Binomial logistic regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to determine the best biomarker (or combination of biomarkers) in detecting MCI converters to AD dementia and then, among the converters, those who converted in short time frames. RESULTS: Thirty-five out of 77 MCI patients (45%) converted to AD dementia, with an average conversion time since MCI diagnosis of 26.07 months. CSF p-tau/Aβ42 was the most accurate predictor of conversion from MCI to AD dementia (82.9% sensitivity; 90% specificity). CSF p-tau/Aβ42 and FDG-PET-positive MCIs converted to AD dementia significantly earlier than the CSF-positive-only MCIs (median conversion time, 17.1 vs 31.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: CSF p-tau/Aβ42 ratio and brain FDG-PET may predict both occurrence and timing of MCI conversion to full-blown AD dementia. MCI patients with both biomarkers suggestive for AD will likely develop an AD dementia shortly, thus representing the ideal target for any new experimental drug requiring short periods to be tested for

    The CSF p-tau181/Aβ42 Ratio Offers a Good Accuracy "In Vivo" in the Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia.

    Full text link
    BACKGROUND: The incoming disease-modifying therapies against Alzheimer's disease (AD) require reliable diagnostic markers to correctly enroll patients all over the world. CSF AD biomarkers, namely amyloid-β 42 (Aβ42), total tau (t-tau), and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181), showed good diagnostic accuracy in detecting AD pathology, but their real usefulness in daily clinical practice is still a matter of debate. Therefore, further validation in complex clinical settings, that is patients with different types of dementia, is needed to uphold their future worldwide adoption. METHODS: We measured CSF AD biomarkers' concentrations in a sample of 526 patients with a clinical diagnosis of dementia (277 with AD and 249 with Other Type of Dementia, OTD). Brain FDG-PET was also considered in a subsample of 54 patients with a mismatch between the clinical diagnosis and the CSF findings. RESULTS: A p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio higher than 0.13 showed the best diagnostic performance in differentiating AD from OTD (86% accuracy index, 74% sensitivity, 81% specificity). In cases with a mismatch between clinical diagnosis and CSF findings, brain FDG-PET partially agreed with the p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio, thus determining an increase in CSF accuracy. CONCLUSION: The p-tau181/Aβ42 ratio alone might reliably detect AD pathology in heterogeneous samples of patients suffering from different types of dementia. It might constitute a simple, cost-effective and reproducible in vivo proxy of AD suitable to be adopted worldwide not only in daily clinical practice but also in future experimental trials, to avoid the enrolment of misdiagnosed AD patients

    Tocilizumab for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The single-arm TOCIVID-19 prospective trial

    Full text link
    BackgroundTocilizumab blocks pro-inflammatory activity of interleukin-6 (IL-6), involved in pathogenesis of pneumonia the most frequent cause of death in COVID-19 patients.MethodsA multicenter, single-arm, hypothesis-driven trial was planned, according to a phase 2 design, to study the effect of tocilizumab on lethality rates at 14 and 30 days (co-primary endpoints, a priori expected rates being 20 and 35%, respectively). A further prospective cohort of patients, consecutively enrolled after the first cohort was accomplished, was used as a secondary validation dataset. The two cohorts were evaluated jointly in an exploratory multivariable logistic regression model to assess prognostic variables on survival.ResultsIn the primary intention-to-treat (ITT) phase 2 population, 180/301 (59.8%) subjects received tocilizumab, and 67 deaths were observed overall. Lethality rates were equal to 18.4% (97.5% CI: 13.6-24.0, P=0.52) and 22.4% (97.5% CI: 17.2-28.3, P<0.001) at 14 and 30 days, respectively. Lethality rates were lower in the validation dataset, that included 920 patients. No signal of specific drug toxicity was reported. In the exploratory multivariable logistic regression analysis, older age and lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio negatively affected survival, while the concurrent use of steroids was associated with greater survival. A statistically significant interaction was found between tocilizumab and respiratory support, suggesting that tocilizumab might be more effective in patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline.ConclusionsTocilizumab reduced lethality rate at 30 days compared with null hypothesis, without significant toxicity. Possibly, this effect could be limited to patients not requiring mechanical respiratory support at baseline.Registration EudraCT (2020-001110-38); clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04317092)

    Correction to: Tocilizumab for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The single-arm TOCIVID-19 prospective trial

    Full text link
    corecore