3 research outputs found

    Increased proton pump inhibitor and NSAID exposure in irritable bowel syndrome: results from a case-control study

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) seen by a gastroenterologist often utilize medications that may alter intestinal homeostasis. The question arises whether exposure to these drugs is associated with the development of IBS symptoms. Aim of this study was therefore to assess the use of PPIs and NSAIDs in patients with IBS versus controls. METHODS: Cases of IBS from the last 5 years were reviewed. All patients having had at least one prescription for a particular drug (PPIs, NSAIDs, SSRIs, diuretics, ACE inhibitors) in the 6 months prior to the time of initial symptom onset were considered exposed. The control group consisted of individuals randomly selected from the general population. RESULTS: 287 cases of IBS were retrieved for analysis together with 287 age and sex-matched controls. Exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs was significantly higher in IBS patients, whereas no association between ACE inhibitor use and IBS was found. PPIs were not significantly associated when excluding patients with gastrointestinal reflux disease or functional dyspepsia. Exposure to SSRIs was also positively associated with IBS, but only when patients with psychiatric comorbidity were included in the analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Medications that may alter intestinal homeostasis such as NSAIDs and PPIs were more frequently used in IBS patients compared to controls. This association might be relevant for everyday clinical practice, but it is remains to be elucidated whether this association is of etiological nature

    Is clostridium difficile associated with relapse of inflammatory bowel disease? results from a retrospective and prospective cohort study in the Netherlands

    Get PDF
    Background:Although Clostridium difficile may be associated with exacerbations in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), prospective studies identifying the role of C. difficile in disease activity are currently lacking. We examined the prevalence of C. difficile in feces of (1) symptomatic IBD patients retrospectively and (2) consecutive outpatients in relation to disease activity prospectively.Methods:From adult IBD patients with increase of symptoms, fecal samples collected between November 2010 and 2011 were tested for C. difficile, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, and Campylobacter spp. Within a prospective IBD cohort, fecal samples, clinical data, and disease activity scores were collected every 3 months and during relapses. Baseline samples from all subjects (170 Crohn's disease, 116 ulcerative colitis) and additional samples from patients with changing disease activity during follow-up (57 Crohn's disease, 31 ulcerative colitis) were tested for C. difficile and when positive for toxin A and B genes by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.Results:From 104 symptomatic patients, 139 fecal samples were analyzed. Toxinogenic C. difficile and Campylobacter jejuni were detected in 3.6% and 1.8%. In the prospective cohort, C. difficile prevalence at baseline was significantly different neither between ulcerative colitis (3.4%) and Crohn's disease patients (5.9%) nor between active (8.2%) and quiescent (3.3%) disease. In multivariable analysis, C. difficile was not associated with disease activity, disease subtype, gender, antibiotic, and immunosuppressive therapy. Clostridium difficile was also not associated with disease activity within patients with changing disease activity over time (P = 0.45).Conclusions:We found a low prevalence of C. difficile, and our findings indicate that C. difficile is not a common trigger for exacerbations of IBD in clinical practice in the Netherlands
    corecore