Extensively drug-resistant and multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens in the neurocritical intensive care unit

Background Abrupt increase of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and pandrug-resistant bacteria may complicate the course, management, and costs of neurocritical patients and is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. No data exists regarding risk factors for colonization by gram-negative pathogens in neurocritical patients. The aim of the study was to identify risk factors associated with colonization by multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and pandrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria in neurocritical patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a neurointensive care unit over a period of 3 years. We included adult neurocritical patients admitted for more than 48 h. We analyzed several factors including both anamnestic factors and admission diagnosis. Results Four hundred twenty neurocritical patients were retrospectively enrolled. Seventy-three patients developed colonization by multidrug-resistant and 53 by extensively drug-resistant gram negative pathogens. Logistic regression identified intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) as the strongest predictor for both multidrug-resistant (AUC 0.877; 95% CI 0.841-0.913) and extensively drug-resistant (AUC 0.839 0.787-0.892) gram negative pathogens. In addition, external ventricular drainage and intracerebral pressure monitoring catheter were risk factors for XDR. Survival analysis revealed that MDR bacteria colonization happens earlier (log-rank testp = 0.017). Conclusions Optimization of healthcare strategies is required in order to reduce patients' length of stay to prevent multi- and extensively-drug gram-negative colonizations. Indeed, an early external ventricular drainage and intracerebral pressure monitoring catheter removal is deemed necessary as soon as clinically appropriate

Treatments for intracranial hypertension in acute brain-injured patients: grading, timing, and association with outcome. Data from the SYNAPSE-ICU study

Purpose: Uncertainties remain about the safety and efficacy of therapies for managing intracranial hypertension in acute brain injured (ABI) patients. This study aims to describe the therapeutical approaches used in ABI, with/without intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, among different pathologies and across different countries, and their association with six months mortality and neurological outcome. Methods: A preplanned subanalysis of the SYNAPSE-ICU study, a multicentre, prospective, international, observational cohort study, describing the ICP treatment, graded according to Therapy Intensity Level (TIL) scale, in patients with ABI during the first week of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Results: 2320 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 55 (I-III quartiles = 39-69) years, and 800 (34.5%) were female. During the first week from ICU admission, no-basic TIL was used in 382 (16.5%) patients, mild-moderate in 1643 (70.8%), and extreme in 295 cases (eTIL, 12.7%). Patients who received eTIL were younger (median age 49 (I-III quartiles = 35-62) vs 56 (40-69) years, p < 0.001), with less cardiovascular pre-injury comorbidities (859 (44%) vs 90 (31.4%), p < 0.001), with more episodes of neuroworsening (160 (56.1%) vs 653 (33.3%), p < 0.001), and were more frequently monitored with an ICP device (221 (74.9%) vs 1037 (51.2%), p < 0.001). Considerable variability in the frequency of use and type of eTIL adopted was observed between centres and countries. At six months, patients who received no-basic TIL had an increased risk of mortality (Hazard ratio, HR = 1.612, 95% Confidence Interval, CI = 1.243-2.091, p < 0.001) compared to patients who received eTIL. No difference was observed when comparing mild-moderate TIL with eTIL (HR = 1.017, 95% CI = 0.823-1.257, p = 0.873). No significant association between the use of TIL and neurological outcome was observed. Conclusions: During the first week of ICU admission, therapies to control high ICP are frequently used, especially mild-moderate TIL. In selected patients, the use of aggressive strategies can have a beneficial effect on six months mortality but not on neurological outcome