43 research outputs found
Reactive-Oxygen-Species-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems: Promises and Challenges
Given the increasing evidence indicates that many pathological conditions are associated with elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, there have been growing research efforts focused on the development of ROS-responsive carrier systems because of their promising potential to realize more specific diagnosis and effective therapy. By judicious utilization of ROS-responsive functional moieties, a wide range of carrier systems has been designed for ROS-mediated drug delivery. In this review article, insights into design principle and recent advances on the development of ROS-responsive carrier systems for drug delivery applications are provided alongside discussion of their in vitro and in vivo evaluation. In particular, the discussions in this article will mainly focus on polymeric nanoparticles, hydrogels, inorganic nanoparticles, and activatable prodrugs that have been integrated with diverse ROS-responsive moieties for spatiotemporally controlled release of drugs for effective therapy.1149sciescopu
Chemical Tools for Targeted Amplification of Reactive Oxygen Species in Neutrophils
A number of chemical compounds are known, which amplify the availability of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in neutrophils both in vitro and in vivo. They can be roughly classified into NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2)-dependent and NOX2-independent reagents. NOX2 activation is triggered by protein kinase C agonists (e.g., phorbol esters, transition metal ions), redox mediators (e.g., paraquat) or formyl peptide receptor (FPR) agonists (e.g., aromatic hydrazine derivatives). NOX2-independent mechanisms are realized by reagents affecting glutathione homeostasis (e.g., l-buthionine sulfoximine), modulators of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (e.g., ionophores, inositol mimics, and agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ) and chemical ROS amplifiers [e.g., aminoferrocene-based prodrugs (ABPs)]. Since a number of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, as well as cancer and bacterial infections, are triggered or enhanced by aberrant ROS production in neutrophils, it is tempting to use ROS amplifiers as drugs for the treatment of these diseases. However, since the known reagents are not cell specific, their application for treatment likely causes systemic enhancement of oxidative stress, leading to severe side effects. Cell-targeted ROS enhancement can be achieved either by using conjugates of ROS amplifiers with ligands binding to receptors expressed on neutrophils (e.g., the GPI-anchored myeloid differentiation marker Ly6G or FPR) or by designing reagents activated by neutrophil function [e.g., phagocytic activity or enzymatic activity of neutrophil elastase (NE)]. Since binding of an artificial ligand to a receptor may trigger or inhibit priming of neutrophils the latter approach has a smaller potential for severe side effects and is probably better suitable for therapy. Here, we review current approaches for the use of ROS amplifiers and discuss their applicability for treatment. As an example, we suggest a possible design of neutrophil-specific ROS amplifiers, which are based on NE-activated ABPs
Aminoferrocene-Based Prodrugs Activated by Reactive Oxygen Species
Cancer cells generally generate higher amounts of reactive
oxygen
species than normal cells. On the basis of this difference, prodrugs
have been developed (e.g., hydroxyferrocifen), which remain inactive
in normal cells, but become activated in cancer cells. In this work
we describe novel aminoferrocene-based prodrugs, which, in contrast
to hydroxyferrocifen, after activation form not only quinone methides
(QMs), but also catalysts (iron or ferrocenium ions). The released
products act in a concerted fashion. In particular, QMs alkylate glutathione,
thereby inhibiting the antioxidative system of the cell, whereas the
iron species induce catalytic generation of hydroxyl radicals. Since
the catalysts are formed as products of the activation reaction, it
proceeds autocatalytically. The most potent prodrug described here
is toxic toward cancer cells (human promyelocytic leukemia (HL-60),
IC<sub>50</sub> = 9 μM, and human glioblastoma-astrocytoma (U373),
IC<sub>50</sub> = 25 μM), but not toxic (up to 100 μM)
toward representative nonmalignant cells (fibroblasts)