7 research outputs found

    American Orthopaedic Association's (AOA) Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors (CORD) 2022 Summer Conference: Top Abstracts

    No full text
    In a continuing collaboration between the American Orthopaedic Association's (AOA) Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors (CORD) and JBJS, the following 10 abstracts highlight the scientific research presented at AOA's annual national meeting held in June 2022. These abstracts embody CORD's purpose and mission:“The American Orthopaedic Association's Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors (CORD) program strives to recognize best practices in orthopaedic residency education and fellowship education based on ACGME [Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education]-defined essential knowledge and skills in each of the residency education competency areas. CORD provides a forum for academic orthopaedic leaders to exchange ideas, discuss solutions to challenges, and find ways to teach residents in orthopaedic programs effectively.” We hope this education-related research will inspire further inquiry to advance the development of future orthopaedic surgeons

    An Evaluation of Resources Available to Learn About Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs

    No full text
    Introduction:. Orthopaedic surgery is one of the most competitive residencies to match into, and understanding what information is useful for applicants can reduce the number of programs applied to. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine which residency recruitment resources influence where applicants apply and how they rank programs, (2) identify what information would be most helpful for applicants to learn about programs, and (3) determine whether orthopaedic surgery applicants have preferential solutions to improve the application process. Methods:. Medical students who applied to the orthopaedic surgery residency program at the senior author's institution during the 2021-2022 application cycle were invited to participate in this study. The anonymous Qualtrics survey covered several domains of demographics and questions about recruitment resources (e.g., residency websites, in-person away rotations, rankings, and databases with information about orthopaedic surgery programs). Results:. Of the 216 survey respondents, 77 (35.6%) identified as female and 132 (61.1%) as male. Twenty-four (11.1%) respondents were the first in their family to graduate from an undergraduate program, and 47 (21.8%) applicants had a physician in their immediate family. Survey respondents selected in-person away rotations as the most influential factor in deciding where to apply (n = 97) and how to rank programs (n = 117). Regarding the residency match, 152 survey respondents (70.4%) would like interview caps, 128 (59.3%) would like an increase in program information available on residency databases, and 120 (55.5%) would like application caps. Discussion:. Medical students applying to orthopaedic surgery residency programs found in-person away rotations to be most influential on which programs they applied to. Applicants would like more transparency during the application process to make better informed decisions when applying to and ranking programs. Residency program directors can apply these preferences to facilitate a more equitable process for all students applying to orthopaedic surgery. Level of Evidence:. V

    Gender Disparity in Authorship Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents

    No full text
    Background:. Gender disparity remains pervasive in orthopaedic surgery, which affects the research pursuits of orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to characterize gender-related authorship trends of orthopaedic surgery residents, including evaluation of gender-concordant publication rates. Methods:. An observational cross-sectional analysis of US orthopaedic surgery residency programs was performed. Information on residency programs and demographics of each cohort was collected. Publication metrics consisting of number of first and non-first author publications and H-indices were manually obtained for PGY-3 to PGY-5 residents attending the 25 programs ranked the highest for research output by Doximity. Gender of each resident and senior author was determined from institutional websites using photos, biographies, and preferred pronouns when available. Results:. A total of 532 residents, 169 (31.8%) female and 363 (68.2%) male, were included for authorship analysis. Of them, 415 (78%) had at least one first author publication, which did not vary significantly by gender. Female residents had disproportionately fewer first author publications compared with their representation (22% vs. 31.8%, p < 0.00001). Female residents averaged fewer first and non-first author publications compared with male residents (2.8 vs. 4.6, p = 0.0003; 6.4 vs. 10, p = 0.0001 respectively). Despite fewer publications overall, a greater subset of publications by female residents were written in collaboration with a female senior author compared with publications by male residents (p < 0.0001). Male residents had a higher average H-index of 5.4 vs. 3.9 among female residents (p = 0.00007). Conclusion:. Despite similar rates of first author publication among male and female residents, female residents had fewer publications overall, lower H-indices, and disproportionately fewer first author publications than would be expected given their representation. Findings from this study suggest that gender disparity in orthopaedic surgery extends to differences in research productivity as early as in residency. This may have negative implications on the career advancement of female orthopaedic surgeons. Additional work is needed to identify and understand biases in research productivity and career advancement, to promote more equitable strategies for academic achievement. Level of Evidence:. IV

    Restoring Horizontal Stability of the Acromioclavicular Joint: Open Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction and Repair With Semitendinosus Allograft

    No full text
    Injuries to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint are common and comprise ∼12% of shoulder injuries. Stability to the AC joint depends on the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments for vertical stability and AC ligaments and capsular structures for horizontal stability. Injuries to the AC ligaments can lead to horizontal instability of the AC joint. There is no gold standard technique for treating these injuries surgically, and many of the described procedures focus on vertical instability rather than horizontal instability. This article describes an open AC ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus allograft to restore horizontal stability of the AC joint

    Doximity Orthopaedic Surgery Program Rankings Are Associated with Academic Productivity

    No full text
    Background:. Doximity residency rankings are used to compare training programs. Reputation is a component of Doximity rankings and is based on physician surveys. Outcomes-based measures allow for objective program comparison and may be more appropriate when assessing programs. This study evaluated how Doximity rankings of orthopaedic surgery residency programs compare with an outcomes-based ranking of programs based on academic productivity. This study also evaluated whether program size and type were associated with academic productivity. Methods:. Orthopaedic program rankings, size, type, and research productivity were recorded from Doximity. An academic productivity score was calculated by averaging the mean percentage of alumni clinical trials and alumni publications. Analysis of variance and post hoc analyses were performed to determine whether academic productivity was associated with program reputation, size, and type. Results:. One hundred seventy-five orthopaedic residency programs were included. Program rankings, size, and type had a statistically significant association with academic productivity (p < 0.0001). The 44 orthopaedic programs in the top quartile had an academic productivity score of 79.1 ± 13 in comparison with programs in the bottom quartile, who had a score of 38.3 ± 12.1 (p < 0.0001). Of the programs in the top quartile of reputation rankings, 32 (73%) were also in the top quartile for academic productivity. Programs with more residents demonstrated greater academic productivity than smaller programs. Twenty-three programs (13%) had more than 30 residents and a mean academic productivity of 76.2 ± 14.8. In comparison, 13 programs (7.5%) had 10 or fewer residents with an academic productivity score of 40.6 ± 16.3 (p < 0.0001). An academic productivity score differed significantly based on program type: university (63.9 ± 14.8), military (54.7 ± 16.9), university/community (46.3 ± 15.6), and community (38.7 ± 15) (p < 0.0001). Conclusions:. Academic productivity among orthopaedic residency programs is associated with Doximity ranking, program size, and type. This information can be used by medical students, residents, and physicians to understand the Doximity rankings and how they correlate with this objective measure. Level of Evidence:. III

    Systematic Review of Intra-Articular Use of Antibiotics and Antiseptic Irrigation and their Association with Chondrolysis

    No full text
    Category: Arthroscopy; Other Introduction/Purpose: Intra-articular antibiotics have been proposed as a treatment for septic arthritis to allow for high local concentrations without subjecting a patient to systemic therapy and its associated toxicity/side effects. However, there is concern for chondrotoxicity with intra-articular use of antimicrobials and antiseptic solutions in high concentrations. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the intra-articular use of antibiotics and antiseptic solutions, determine their association with chondrolysis following in vitro or in vivo administration, and identify the dosages at which they become chondrotoxic. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines through PubMed, Clinical Key, OVID, and Google Scholar. Studies were included if they were written in the English language and evaluated for chondrotoxicity following in vitro or in vivo intra-articular exposure to an antibiotic and antiseptic solutions. All agents, study characteristics, and conclusions were extracted and summarized. Results: The initial search resulted in 228 studies, with 36 meeting full inclusion criteria. Overall, chondrotoxicity was not associated with 7 out of 24 (29%) included agents: minocycline, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, teicoplanin, pefloxacin, linezolid, polymyxin-bacitracin. Inconsistent results were noted with 8 (33%) agents: doxycycline, ceftriaxone, gentamicin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, chlorhexidine, and povidone iodine. Chondrotoxicity was evident with 9 (38%) agents, all of which were also dose-dependently chondrotoxic based on reported estimated half maximal inhibitory concentrations (est.IC50): amikacin (est. IC50 = 0.31-2.74 mg/mL), neomycin (0.82 mg/mL), cefazolin (1.67-3.95 mg/mL), ceftazidime (3.16-3.59 mg/mL), ampicillin- sulbactam (8.64 - >25 mg/mL), penicillin (11.61 mg/mL), amoxicillin (14.01 mg/mL), imipenem (>25 mg/mL), and tobramycin (>25 mg/mL). Additionally, certain studies reported chondroprotective effects of doxycycline and minocycline. Conclusion: This systematic review identified antimicrobial and antiseptic agents that may be used in the treatment of septic arthritis. The following agents should be avoided due to their dose-dependent chondrotoxic effects: amikacin, neomycin, cefazolin, ceftazidime, ampicillin-sulbactam, penicillin, amoxicillin, imipenem, and tobramycin. Further studies, especially in human models, are needed to clarify the safety of these medications for human intra-articular use

    The Impact of a Virtual Orthopaedic Surgery Symposium on Medical Students: Increasing Awareness and Knowledge of the Field

    No full text
    Background:. Orthopaedic surgery has become an increasingly popular field of residency training for medical students. Many institutions offer elective time to explore areas of interest through clinical rotations and research; however, most of these opportunities are reserved for senior medical students. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dedicated medical student orthopaedic surgery symposium to increase awareness about the field and to assess students' interest and knowledge of orthopaedic surgery before and after the symposium. Methods:. Medical students were invited to submit orthopaedic surgery–related research to a free, 1-day virtual symposium held in April 2022. Abstracts were reviewed and selected from 9 different orthopaedic surgery subspecialty categories. Survey assessments were sent to medical students to complete before and after the symposium. The surveys included questions related to participant demographics as well as interest and knowledge about the field of orthopaedic surgery. Statistical analyses were completed to compare the participants' responses before and after the symposium. Results:. In total, 962 medical students registered for the 4-hour symposium. Of these, 58.5% completed the presymposium survey and 48.0% completed the postsymposium survey. 13.3% of the respondents reported being “very knowledgeable” about the various orthopaedic surgery subspecialties before the symposium, which increased to 18.4% after the symposium. 46.9% of the participants stated that they were “knowledgeable” about the daily life of an orthopaedic surgery resident before the symposium, which increased to 67.3% after the symposium. Similarly, the percentage of respondents who reported that they were “very knowledgeable” about the residency match process increased from 12.2% presymposium to 22.4% postsymposium. Conclusions:. As interest in pursuing a career in orthopaedic surgery increases, medical students will continue to seek information, mentorship, and opportunities to present their research in preparation for residency applications. Our study demonstrated that a large-scale, national, virtual orthopaedic surgery symposium provided a platform to augment medical students' knowledge of the field, present their research, and interact with faculty members. Level of Evidence:. Level V
    corecore