Asynchronous combinatorial action of four regulatory factors activates Bcl11b for T cell commitment

During T cell development, multipotent progenitors relinquish competence for other fates and commit to the T cell lineage by turning on Bcl11b, which encodes a transcription factor. To clarify lineage commitment mechanisms, we followed developing T cells at the single-cell level using Bcl11b knock-in fluorescent reporter mice. Notch signaling and Notch-activated transcription factors collaborate to activate Bcl11b expression irrespectively of Notch-dependent proliferation. These inputs work via three distinct, asynchronous mechanisms: an early locus 'poising' function dependent on TCF-1 and GATA-3, a stochastic-permissivity function dependent on Notch signaling, and a separate amplitude-control function dependent on Runx1, a factor already present in multipotent progenitors. Despite their necessity for Bcl11b expression, these inputs act in a stage-specific manner, providing a multitiered mechanism for developmental gene regulation

Asynchronous combinatorial action of four regulatory factors activates Bcl11b for T cell commitment

During T cell development, multipotent progenitors relinquish competence for other fates and commit to the T cell lineage by turning on Bcl11b, which encodes a transcription factor. To clarify lineage commitment mechanisms, we followed developing T cells at the single-cell level using Bcl11b knock-in fluorescent reporter mice. Notch signaling and Notch-activated transcription factors collaborate to activate Bcl11b expression irrespectively of Notch-dependent proliferation. These inputs work via three distinct, asynchronous mechanisms: an early locus 'poising' function dependent on TCF-1 and GATA-3, a stochastic-permissivity function dependent on Notch signaling, and a separate amplitude-control function dependent on Runx1, a factor already present in multipotent progenitors. Despite their necessity for Bcl11b expression, these inputs act in a stage-specific manner, providing a multitiered mechanism for developmental gene regulation

The role of aquaporin-4 in optic nerve head astrocytes in experimental glaucoma.

PurposeTo study aquaporin channel expression in astrocytes of the mouse optic nerve (ON) and the response to IOP elevation in mice lacking aquaporin 4 (AQP4 null).MethodsC57BL/6 (B6) and AQP4 null mice were exposed to bead-induced IOP elevation for 3 days (3D-IOP), 1 and 6 weeks. Mouse ocular tissue sections were immunolabeled against aquaporins 1(AQP1), 4(AQP4), and 9(AQP9). Ocular tissue was imaged to identify normal AQP distribution, ON changes, and axon loss after IOP elevation. Ultrastructure examination, cell proliferation, gene expression, and transport block were also analyzed.ResultsB6 mice had abundant AQP4 expression in Müller cells, astrocytes of retina and myelinated ON (MON), but minimal AQP4in prelaminar and unmyelinated ON (UON). MON of AQP4 nulls had smaller ON area, smaller axon diameter, higher axon density, and larger proportionate axon area than B6 (all p≤0.05). Bead-injection led to comparable 3D-IOP elevation (p = 0.42) and axonal transport blockade in both strains. In B6, AQP4 distribution was unchanged after 3D-IOP. At baseline, AQP1 and AQP9 were present in retina, but not in UON and this was unaffected after IOP elevation in both strains. In 3D-IOP mice, ON astrocytes and microglia proliferated, more in B6 than AQP4 null. After 6 week IOP elevation, axon loss occurred equally in the two mouse types (24.6%, AQP4 null vs. 23.3%, B6).ConclusionLack of AQP4 was neither protective nor detrimental to the effects of IOP elevation. The minimal presence of AQP4 in UON may be a vital aspect of the regionally specific phenotype of astrocytes in the mouse optic nerve head

Screening performance of functional and structural measurements of neural damage in open-angle glaucoma: A case-control study from the Baltimore eye survey

Purpose: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of four approaches to glaucoma screening. Methods: Case patients were persons with possible, probable, or definite glaucomatous optic nerve damage, as judged by a glaucoma specialist using Humphrey 24-2 threshold findings and clinical assessment of disc and nerve fiber layer, identified in the population-based Baltimore Eye Survey Follow-up Study. Control patients were participants in the same study, frequency-matched for age, without evidence of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Participants underwent optic disc photography (Topcon ImageNet), disc imaging (GlaucomaScope), scanning laser polarimetry (Nerve Fiber Analyzer), and suprathreshold field testing (Dicon). Results: A total of 100 case patients with open-angle glaucoma and 149 control patients were included. Objective imaging had the best screening performance. For the GlaucomaScope, a criterion of cup-to-disc ratio of ≥0.68 had a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 82% for detecting eyes with definite or probable glaucomatous optic nerve damage. For the nerve fiber layer, a criterion of The Number as ≥20 had a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 77% for detecting eyes with definite or probable glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Usable data could be obtained in 93% of participants with the Dicon and the Nerve Fiber Analyzer and in 82% and 87% of participants with the GlaucomaScope and Topcon instruments, respectively. Conclusions: Vertical cup-to-disc ratio, as measured by the GlaucomaScope or Topcon instruments, and the Nerve Fiber Layer neural network Number had the best combination of sensitivity and specificity among the instruments tested. The Nerve Fiber Analyzer had the highest percentage of participants with usable data