Dental implants in dentate primary and secondary Sjögren's syndrome patients:A multicenter prospective cohort study

Objectives: To prospectively assess the clinical performance and patient-reported outcomes of dental implants in dentate patients with primary and secondary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS and sSS, respectively) compared to patients without SS. Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven implants were placed in 17 patients with pSS/sSS and 26 implants in 17 non-SS patients to replace missing (pre)molars. Clinical performance, marginal bone-level changes, patient satisfaction, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) were assessed at 1 (T1), 6 (T6), 12 (T12), and 18 (T18) months after placement of the superstructure. Marginal bone-level changes were measured on standardized dental radiographs. Clinical parameters included implant and crown survival, plaque, bleeding and gingival indices, and probing depth. Patient satisfaction and OHRQoL were assessed with validated questionnaires. Results: Implant survival at T18 was 100% in the patients with pSS/sSS and 96.2% in the non-SS group. Mean marginal bone loss at T18 did not differ between patients with pSS/sSS and non-SS patients, 1.10 ± 1.04 and 1.04 ± 0.75 mm, respectively (p =.87). Clinical performance was good with no differences between the groups for all outcome measures (p >.05). OHRQoL in patients with pSS/sSS had improved significantly after placement of implant supported crowns at all measuring moments compared to baseline (p <.05). Nevertheless, patient satisfaction and OHRQoL remained significantly higher for patients without SS at all measuring moments (p <.05). Conclusion: Dental implants can be successfully applied in dentate patients with pSS/sSS and have a positive effect on OHRQoL

Tracheostomy versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants with Robin sequence: A comparative cost analysis

Many treatments have been described for infants with Robin sequence and severe respiratory distress, but there have not been many comparative studies of outcome and cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study was to compare the cost and complications of two common interventions - mandibular distraction osteogenesis and tracheostomy. Nine patients with isolated Robin sequence (mandibular distraction osteogenesis, n = 5, and tracheostomy, n = 4) were included in the analyses. Predetermined costs and complications were obtained retrospectively from medical records and by questionnaires to the parents over a 12-month period. Overall direct costs (admission to hospital, diagnostics, surgery, and homecare) were 3 times higher for tracheostomy (€105.523 compared with €33.482, p = 0.02). Overall indirect costs (absence from work) were almost 5 times higher (€2.543 compared with €543, p = 0.02). There was a threefold increase in overall total cost/patient (both direct and indirect) for tracheostomy (€108.057 compared with 34.016, p = 0.02) and 4 times more complications were encountered. This study shows that mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants diagnosed with Robin sequence costs significantly less and results in fewer complications than tracheostomy, and this contributes to our current knowledge about the ideal approach for infants with Robin sequence and might provide a basis for institutional protocols in the future. © 2013 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Parental preferences for the first consultation for microtia

Objectives The aim of our study was to investigate subjective information concerning parental experiences and preferences with regard to the initial information that is provided right after the birth of a child with microtia. The analysis of these data is intended to help professionals improve the way in which such conversations are conducted. As a result, future parents may feel better informed and, hence, better fit to cope with challenges they may encounter having a child with microtia. Methods A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 106 parents and caretakers of children with microtia who visited the annual International Microtia and Atresia Conference in the Netherlands, May 2016. Results Eighty-seven questionnaires were returned (response rate 82%). Results revealed that 26% of the participants did not receive any information about the condition in the perinatal period. Participants who did receive information right after birth were informed by pediatricians and otolaryngolosits in most of the cases. Plastic surgeons and maxillofacial surgeons were the less commonly serving specialties in this role. A majority of the participants experienced their informing consultation as either being “terrible” or “bad”. Parents desired more information about all domains regarding microtia. Development, clothing and appearance, and psychology were believed to be the least important domains. Conclusions Parents are dissatisfied with several aspects of the initial information that is provided right after the birth of a child with microtia. We believe that there is a need for correct information and patient- and family centered care administered by multiple disciplines

A Prospective Study on the Effect of Modified Alar Cinch Sutures and V-Y Closure Versus Simple Closing Sutures on Nasolabial Changes After Le Fort I Intrusion and Advancement Osteotomies

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a modified alar cinch suture and V-Y closure (mACVY) have a beneficial effect on labial form after Le Fort I intrusion and advancement osteotomies and whether they result in excessive upward nasal tip rotation. Both are possible effects compared with simple closing sutures (SCS). Patients and Methods: A prospective study was carried out on 56 patients, 31 with mACVY and 25 with SCS. Lateral cephalograms taken immediately before and 18 months after operation were used, measuring horizontal and vertical changes of the following landmarks: anterior and posterior nasal spine, A-point, incision superior, pronasale, subnasale, labiale superior, and stomion superior, as well as angular changes of sella-nasion-pronasale, and changes in upper vermilion exposure. Statistical analysis was performed on intragroup, paired t test, and intergroup differences, unpaired t test (P <.05). Results: The horizontal and vertical changes of labiale superior were significantly larger for mACVY versus SCS, and the angle sella-nasion-pronasale increased in mACVY versus SCS. However, no significant difference was found for vertical changes of the nasal tip. Upper vermilion exposure increased with mACVY versus SCS. Conclusion: mACVY has a beneficial effect on labial form, and excessive upward rotation of the nasal tip is prevented. (C) 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:870-876, 201

Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Tongue-Lip Adhesion

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have proven the efficacy of mandibular distraction osteogenesis or tongue-lip adhesion in Robin sequence infants with upper airway obstruction. However, none has compared health-related quality of life outcomes. METHODS: In the present retrospective study, Robin sequence infants younger than 1 year, who underwent mandibular distraction osteogenesis or tongue-lip adhesion, were included (2006 to 2016). The infants' caregivers were asked to complete a questionnaire based on the Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory. RESULTS: The response rate was 71 percent (22 of the 31 questionnaires; mandibular distraction osteogenesis, 12 of 15; and tongue-lip adhesion, 10 of 16) and median age at surgery was 24 days (range, 5 to 131 days). Median total Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory scores after mandibular distraction osteogenesis and after tongue-lip adhesion were 21.9 (interquartile range, 9.4) and 26.0 (interquartile range, 37.5), respectively (p = 0.716), indicating an overall benefit from both procedures. Positive changes were observed in all subgroups emotion, physical health, learning, and vitality. In syndromic Robin sequence, both procedures demonstrated a lower positive change in health-related quality of life compared with isolated Robin sequence (p = 0.303). CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical procedures demonstrated an overall benefit in health-related quality-of-life outcomes, with no significant differences. The authors' findings contribute to the debate regarding the use of mandibular distraction osteogenesis versus tongue-lip adhesion in the surgical treatment of Robin sequence; however, studies evaluating health-related quality of life in larger Robin sequence cohorts are necessary to identify which procedure is likely to be best in each individual Robin sequence infant. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III

A systematic review on the outcome of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants suffering Robin sequence

Objectives: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) has been successfully applied in infants suffering Robin sequence (RS) with severe upper airway obstruction, but no comparative studies for the different types of MDO exist to date. The objective of the current study was to systematically review the published data considering this matter, providing a fundament for protocols and a more conscious treatment strategy for infants with RS in the near future. Material and methods: For the period from January 1966 to January 2012, the Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Abstracts were screened based on predetermined selection criteria. Relevant full-text articles were retrieved. The articles were analyzed on the type of MDO used, preoperative workup, patient characteristics, postoperative outcome, and complications. Results: The search yielded 109 articles. After checking abstracts and full texts on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 studies (four describing external MDO, five internal MDO, and three both types) were extracted for further analyses. Conclusion: Internal MDO seems very feasible in infants suffering RS, minimizing side effects such as hypertrophic scarring, nerve damage, and extensive care needs, although the indications for usage are more limited compared to the external device. Corresponding protocols and long-term outcome studies are needed to make a better comparison and the use and indication of the different types of distraction even more distinct. Clinical relevance: A base for a guideline to support the choice of a designated operative management for neonates with RS is provided, hereby obviating possible complications of the different types of MDO in the future. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Implant supported overdentures in Sjögren's disease patients:a multicentre prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively investigate patient-reported outcomes and clinical performance of implant supported overdentures in edentulous Sjögren's disease (SjD) patients compared to subjects without SjD. METHODS: 51 implants were placed in 12 patients with SjD and 50 implants in 12 non-SjD patients to support overdentures. Clinical performance, marginal bone-level changes, patient satisfaction and oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) were assessed at 1 (T1), 6 (T6), 12 (T12) and 18 (T18) months after placement of the overdenture. Patient satisfaction, ability to chew and OHRQoL were assessed with validated questionnaires. Marginal bone-level changes were measured on standardised dental radiographs. Clinical parameters included implant and overdenture survival, plaque, bleeding and gingival indices, and probing depth. RESULTS: OHRQoL in patients with SjD improved significantly after placement of implant supported overdentures at all measuring moments compared to baseline (p&lt;0.05). Nevertheless, ability to chew tough and hard food was significantly better for non-SjD patients at all timepoints after placement of an implant supported overdenture (p&lt;0.05). Implant survival at T18 was 100% in the patients with SjD and 98% in the non-SS group. Mean marginal bone loss at T18 did not differ between patients with SjD and non-SS patients, 1.12±0.74 mm and 1.43±1.66 mm, respectively (p=0.58). Clinical performance was good with no differences between the groups for all outcome measures (p&gt;0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Implant-supported overdentures have a positive effect on OHRQoL and dental implants can be successfully applied in edentulous patients with SjD with nearly similar outcomes as in non-SjD subjects.</p

Dental implants in dentate primary and secondary Sjögren's syndrome patients: a multicenter prospective cohort study

Objectives: To prospectively assess the clinical performance and patient-reported outcomes of dental implants in dentate patients with primary and secondary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS and sSS, respectively) compared to patients without SS. Materials and Methods: Thirty-seven implants were placed in 17 patients with pSS/sSS and 26 implants in 17 non-SS patients to replace missing (pre)molars. Clinical performance, marginal bone-level changes, patient satisfaction, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) were assessed at 1 (T1), 6 (T6), 12 (T12), and 18 (T18) months after placement of the superstructure. Marginal bone-level changes were measured on standardized dental radiographs. Clinical parameters included implant and crown survival, plaque, bleeding and gingival indices, and probing depth. Patient satisfaction and OHRQoL were assessed with validated questionnaires. Results: Implant survival at T18 was 100% in the patients with pSS/sSS and 96.2% in the non-SS group. Mean marginal bone loss at T18 did not differ between patients with pSS/sSS and non-SS patients, 1.10 ± 1.04 and 1.04 ± 0.75 mm, respectively (p =.87). Clinical performance was good with no differences between the groups for all outcome measures (p >.05). OHRQoL in patients with pSS/sSS had improved significantly after placement of implant supported crowns at all measuring moments compared to baseline (p <.05). Nevertheless, patient satisfaction and OHRQoL remained significantly higher for patients without SS at all measuring moments (p <.05). Conclusion: Dental implants can be successfully applied in dentate patients with pSS/sSS and have a positive effect on OHRQoL