Appendix_B – Supplemental material for Factors Influencing Academic Motivation of Ethnic Minority Students: A Review

<p>Supplemental material, Appendix_B for Factors Influencing Academic Motivation of Ethnic Minority Students: A Review by Ulviye Isik, Omaima El Tahir, Martijn Meeter, Martijn W. Heymans, Elise P. Jansma, Gerda Croiset and Rashmi A. Kusurkar in SAGE Open</p

Appendix_A – Supplemental material for Factors Influencing Academic Motivation of Ethnic Minority Students: A Review

<p>Supplemental material, Appendix_A for Factors Influencing Academic Motivation of Ethnic Minority Students: A Review by Ulviye Isik, Omaima El Tahir, Martijn Meeter, Martijn W. Heymans, Elise P. Jansma, Gerda Croiset and Rashmi A. Kusurkar in SAGE Open</p

Appendix_1 – Supplemental material for Salvage surgery for local recurrence after stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

<p>Supplemental material, Appendix_1 for Salvage surgery for local recurrence after stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review by Chris Dickhoff, Pedro M. Rodriguez Schaap, Rene H. J. Otten, Martijn W. Heymans, David J. Heineman and Max Dahele in Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology</p

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) showing the results of univariable and multivariable backward logistic regression analyses (GEE models), testing associations of socio-demographic and lifestyle-related variables with any, daily and occasional smoking during pregnancy.

<p>Odds Ratios in <b>Bold</b> Are significant </p><p>*Rounding Error : p<0.05</p><p>**All Religions </p><p>N.A. = Not Applicable</p

Comparisons between participants who completed the questionnaires and who were lost to follow-up on baseline characteristics for Control (C) and Intervention group (I).

<p><i>Note</i>. Numbers are n (%) unless described otherwise.</p><p>¹IPV = Intimate Partner Violence</p><p>Comparisons between participants who completed the questionnaires and who were lost to follow-up on baseline characteristics for Control (C) and Intervention group (I).</p

Items and subscales of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale.

<p>Items and subscales of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale.</p

Flow of the participants through the study.

<div><p>*General practitioners, gynecologists, midwives, street corner workers (comparable to social workers) etc. The number of women for stage 1 is unknown; the pilot studies indicate that the VoorZorg nurses selected approximately 50% of them.</p> <p>^† Only VoorZorg nurses could refer to the expert group, which settles arguments around inclusion .</p> <p>^§ No interviewer available, start-up problems RCT.</p> <p><b>^‡</b> Numbers were only used for the 24-month analyses with imputated values.</p></div

clinical prediction rule for the prediction of hearing loss after childhood BM, as presented by Koomen <i>et al</i>.

<p>clinical prediction rule for the prediction of hearing loss after childhood BM, as presented by Koomen <i>et al</i>.</p

Distribution of children with and without hearing loss across categories of the risk score.

<p>Distribution of children with and without hearing loss across categories of the risk score.</p

Flow chart of patient inclusion.

<p>Flow chart of patient inclusion.</p