Geographic Variation in Medicare Per Capita Spending: Should Policy-Makers Be Concerned?

Reviews research on geographic variations in Medicare spending per capita; contributing factors, including differences in population mix, prices, and type and amount of care; and whether higher spending ensures better care. Discusses policy implications

Are the 2004 Payment Increases Helping to Stem Medicare Advantage's Benefit Erosion?

Examines trends in Medicare Advantage plan benefits and premiums in 2004, paying particular attention to the impact of the payment increases

Identifying, Monitoring, and Assessing Promising Innovations: Using Evaluation to Support Rapid-Cycle Change

Examines the new Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation's mission, critical issues, and challenges in finding effective ways to raise healthcare quality and lower costs, documenting innovation, and providing evidence to support broad policy change

How to provide and pay for long term care of an aging population is an international concern

As populations age, most industrialized nations are seeking to review the structure for their long term care programs with the goal of allocating better limited public resources to meet expanding needs. In this Commentary, I examine critical questions that define the way individual nations provide for the long term care needs of their aging populations. As examined by Asiskovitch, Israel’s programs appear, in cross-national context, to have a broader reach and rely more heavily on community based services. In the future, the challenge Israel may face involves maintaining aspects of its programs that probably account for its popular support and stability while it identifies better the extent of potential gaps in care for those with greater needs and how best to meet them

Medicare Advantage in 2008

Provides an overview of Medicare Advantage, and reviews trends in enrollment, participating firms' market shares, choices available to beneficiaries, and plans for group retiree coverage. Discusses implications for costs and potential policy action

Strategies for Simplifying the Medicare Advantage Market

Explores options for simplifying beneficiary plan choices in the Medicare Advantage Program to achieve economies of scale and to reduce "gaming." Considers the potential effects of requiring minimum plan enrollment and limiting the types of plans offered

Medicare Advantage 2010 Data Spotlight: Plan Enrollment Patterns and Trends

Provides data on nationwide enrollment trends in Medicare Advantage plans by plan type, area, region, and firm or affiliate. Also examines trends in enrollment in group and special needs plans, market concentration, and premiums

Consumer behavior with respect to choice of primary health care facility: a look at a selected sample of users of the Children's Hospital Emergency Room and of the Martha Eliot Family Health Center.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning. Thesis. 1971. M.C.P.Bibliography: leaves 113-118.M.C.P

A National Survey of the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians

Abstract Background. Despite the growth of managed care in the United States, there is little information about the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians. Methods. In 1994 we surveyed by telephone 138 managed-care plans that were selected from 20 metropolitan areas nationwide. Of the 108 plans that responded, 29 were group-model or staff-model health maintenance organizations (HMOs), 50 were network or independentpractice–association (IPA) HMOs, and 29 were preferred-provider organizations (PPOs). Results. Respondents from all three types of plan said they emphasized careful selection of physicians, although the group or staff HMOs tended to have more demanding requirements, such as board certification or eligibility. Sixty-one percent of the plans responded that physicians’ previous patterns of costs or utilization of resources had little influence on their selection; 26 percent said these factors had a moderate influence; and 13 percent said they had a large influence. Some risk sharing with physicians was typical in the HMOs but rare in the PPOs. Fiftysix percent of the network or IPA HMOs used capitation as the predominant method of paying primary care physicians, as compared with 34 percent of the group or staff HMOs and 7 percent of the PPOs. More than half the HMOs reported adjusting payments according to utilization or cost patterns, patient complaints, and measures of the quality of care. Ninety-two percent of the network or IPA HMOs and 61 percent of the group or staff HMOs required their patients to select a primary care physician, who was responsible for most referrals to specialists. About three quarters of the HMOs and 31 percent of the PPOs reported using studies of the outcomes of medical care as part of their quality-improvement programs. Conclusions. Managed-care plans, particularly HMOs, have complex systems for selecting, paying, and monitoring their physicians. Hybrid forms are common, and the differences between group or staff HMOs and network or IPA HMOs are less extensive than is commonly assumed. (N Engl J Med 1995;333:1678-83.

Moving research into practice: lessons from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's IDSRN program

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Integrated Delivery Systems Research Network (IDSRN) program was established to foster public-private collaboration between health services researchers and health care delivery systems. Its broad goal was to link researchers and delivery systems to encourage implementation of research into practice. We evaluated the program to address two primary questions: 1) How successful was IDSRN in generating research findings that could be applied in practice? and 2) What factors facilitate or impede such success? METHODS: We conducted in-person and telephone interviews with AHRQ staff and nine IDSRN partner organizations and their collaborators, reviewed program documents, analyzed projects funded through the program, and developed case studies of four IDSRN projects judged promising in supporting research implementation. RESULTS: Participants reported that the IDSRN structure was valuable in creating closer ties between researchers and participating health systems. Of the 50 completed projects studied, 30 had an operational effect or use. Some kinds of projects were more successful than others in influencing operations. If certain conditions were met, a variety of partnership models successfully supported implementation. An internal champion was necessary for partnerships involving researchers based outside the delivery system. Case studies identified several factors important to success: responsiveness of project work to delivery system needs, ongoing funding to support multiple project phases, and development of applied products or tools that helped users see their operational relevance. Factors limiting success included limited project funding, competing demands on potential research users, and failure to reach the appropriate audience. CONCLUSION: Forging stronger partnerships between researchers and delivery systems has the potential to make research more relevant to users, but these benefits require clear goals and appropriate targeting of resources. Trade-offs are inevitable. The health services research community can best consider such trade-offs and set priorities if there is more dialogue to identify areas and approaches where such partnerships may have the most promise. Though it has unique features, the IDSRN experience is relevant to research implementation in diverse settings