7 research outputs found
SdgB and SdgA sequentially modify the SDR-domain with GlcNAc moieties.
<p>(<b>A</b>) SdgB generates rF1 epitopes on SDR protein. A combination of MBP-SDR-His and SdgA or SdgB was co-expressed in <i>E. coli</i>, and cell lysates were immunoblotted with mAb rF1, or with mAb against unmodified SDR (9G4) or anti-His. (<b>B</b>) Cell-free system to reconstitute SDR glycosylation using purified components. Recombinant MBP-SDR-His was incubated with purified SdgA or SdgB, and in the presence or absence of UDP-GlcNAc; rF1 reactivity was induced only in the presence of SdgB and UDP-GlcNAc. (<b>C</b>) Final model for step-wise glycosylation of SDR proteins by SdgA and SdgB. First, SdgB appends GlcNAc moieties onto the SD-region on SDR proteins, followed by additional GlcNAc modification by SdgA. The epitope for mAb rF1 includes the SdgB-dependent GlcNAc moieties. (<b>D</b>) Mass spectrometry analysis to identify the SDR-sugar moieties using purified MBP-SDR-His expressed in <i>E. coli</i>. (Upper panel) Deconvoluted mass spectrum of purified MBP-SDR-His protein, showing the expected intact mass of 58719 Da. (Middle panel) MBP-SDR-His protein was treated with purified SdgB enzyme in the presence of UDP-GlcNAc for 2 h at 37°C. After incubation, the mass of the MBP-SDR-His protein showed several peaks, each peak being separated from the others by the mass of additional GlcNAc residues. (Bottom panel) The above-mentioned reaction mixture of MBP-SDR-His and SdgB (middle panel) was additionally treated with purified SdgA enzyme. After further incubation for 2 hrs at 37°C, up to an additional 47 GlcNAc groups were found to be added. Thus, most of the serines in the DSD motifs in MBP-SD can be modified with these disaccharide sugar moieties.</p
SdgB glycosylation protects SDR proteins from cleavage by human neutrophil-derived cathepsin G.
<p>(<b>A</b>) Live, in tact WT or Δ<i>sdgB</i> USA300 bacteria were incubated in the presence or absence of human neutrophil lysosomal extracts (NLE). Culture supernatants were immunoblotted with a mAb against the A-domain of ClfA (9E10) to detect cleaved ClfA fragments released from the bacteria. (<b>B</b>) Live, in tact WT or Δ<i>sdgB</i> cells were incubated in the presence or absence of lysosomal extracts from human THP1 cells or mouse RAW cells and culture supernatants were immunoblotted with anti-ClfA. (<b>C</b>) Live, intact WT or Δ<i>sdgB</i> cells were incubated with a panel of purified human neutrophil serine proteases, ie. neutrophil elastase (NE), cathepsin G (CatG), proteinase-3 (P3), and neutrophil serine protease-4 (NSP4). (<b>D</b>) <b>Δ</b><i>sdgB</i> cells were treated with human neutrophil lysosomal extract in the presence or absence of a biochemical inhibitor of cathepsin G. (<b>E</b>) WT or various Sdg-mutant strains were treated with purified human cathepsin G. (<b>B-E</b>) Culture supernatants were analyzed by immunoblotting as in (A) to detect released ClfA fragments. (<b>F</b>) Live bacteria of WT, <b>Δ</b><i>sdgB</i>, or Δ<i>sdgB</i> complemented with exogenous SdgB (p<i>sdgB</i>) were treated with purified human cathepsin G. Culture supernatants (Sup) or cell wall preparations (CWP) were immunoblotted with mAb against the A-domain of ClfA (S4675), SdrD (17H4), or IsdA (2D3). In addition to S4675, another mAb against the A-domain of ClfA (9E10) showed similar results (not shown). (<b>G</b>) Human cathepsin G inhibits adherence of glycosylation-deficient <i>S. aureus</i> to human fibrinogen. Live WT or Δ<i>sdgB</i> USA300 bacteria were pre-incubated with cathepsin G, and allowed to adhere to fibrinogen-precoated plates. Bacterial adhesion was quantified by measuring the amount of bacterial ATP associated with the plates.</p
Recognition of SdgB-dependent epitope by human antibodies.
<p>(<b>A</b>) Four different human IgG preparations were reacted with plate-bound CWP from WT or Δ<i>sdgB</i> USA300 by ELISA. To calculate the specific anti-staphylococcal IgG content, data were normalized using a calibration curve with known IgG concentrations of a mAb against peptidoglycan, which has the same reactivity with both USA300 strains by ELISA. Data are expressed as µg/mL of anti-staphylococcal IgG in the serum. The reduction in reactivity observed for CWP from Δ<i>sdgB</i> (red bars) as compared to wild-type CWP (black bars) reflects IgG specific for SdgB-dependent epitopes. Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) from WT CWP. (<b>B</b>) CWP from WT, Δ<i>sdgA</i>, or Δ<i>sdgB</i>, Δ<i>sdgAΔsdgB</i> USA300 were immunoblotted with rF1 and three additional human mAbs (SD2, SD3, and SD4) from different patients. All four mAbs showed similar epitope specificity.</p
SdgB is the key rF1 epitope-modifying enzyme.
<p>(<b>A</b>) SdgB is necessary for rF1 reactivity. Cell wall lysates from WT and various putative glycosyltransferase mutants were immunoblotted with mAbs rF1, anti-ClfA (9E10), anti-SdrD (17H4) or anti-panSDR (9G4 α-SDR; recognizes the unmodified SDR-domain. (<b>B</b>) Complementation of Δ<i>sdgB</i> with exogenous SdgB confers rF1 reactivity. Cell wall lysates from WT, glycosyltransferase mutants, and the SdgB-complemented strain were immunoblotted with rF1, anti-ClfA, and anti-SDR mAbs as in (A). (<b>C</b>) Binding of rF1 to whole USA300 bacteria requires SdgB. Binding of mAbs to Δ<i>sdgB</i> USA300 was assessed by flow cytometry as described in <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003653#ppat-1003653-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1A</a>. (<b>D</b>) rF1-mediated killing of USA300 activity requires SdgB. Wild-type USA300 bacteria preopsonized with rF1 (closed square) or anti-gD (closed circle), and Δ<i>sdgB</i> preopsonized with rF1 (closed triangle) or anti-gD (open circle), were incubated with PMN, and bacterial killing was determined as in <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003653#ppat-1003653-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1C</a>. (<b>E</b>) MBP-SDR-His construct was expressed in WT, Δ<i>sdgA</i>, Δ<i>sdgB</i>, or Δ<i>sgdAΔsdgB S. aureus</i>, and whole cell lysates were immunoblotted with rF1, anti-His and anti-SDR. (<b>F</b>) Preliminary model for step-wise glycosylation of SDR-proteins by SdgB and SdgA. SDR-domains are first glycosylated by SdgB, which appends sugar modifications creating the epitope of mAb rF1. SdgA further modifies these epitopes with additional sugar moieties (left panel). The Δ<i>sdgA S. aureus</i> mutant shows that SdgA-mediated modifications do not influence rF1-binding activity (middle panel). In Δ<i>sdgB or</i> Δ<i>sgdAΔsdgB S. aureus</i>, the unmodified SDR-region is now recognized by the anti-pan-SDR mAb (9G4).</p
mAb rF1 binds to a family of serine-aspartate-repeat (SDR)-proteins.
<p>(<b>A</b>) rF1-reactivity with USA300 CWP is sensitive to proteinase-K (PK) treatment. Lysostapahin-derived CWP from WT (USA300-Δ<i>spa</i>) bacteria was left untreated (lane 1) or treated with 10 µg/mL PK for 1 hour (lane 2), and immunoblotted with rF1. (<b>B</b>) rF1-reacitivty is dependent on the presence of SDR-proteins. CWPs from WT, indicated deletion strains of various combinations of SDR-family proteins <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003653#ppat.1003653-Fitzgerald1" target="_blank">[12]</a>, <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003653#ppat.1003653-McAleese1" target="_blank">[40]</a>, and a Δ<i>spa</i> strain as control for non-specific binding, were immunoblotted with rF1. The lower molecular weight bands (∼50 kDa) were due to non-specific IgG binding to protein A. (<b>C</b>) rF1 also binds to additional SDR-proteins from <i>S. epidermidis</i>. Cell lysates from <i>S. epidemidis</i> were immunoprecipitated with rF1 (lane 1) or an isotype-control mAb (lane 2) and immunoblotted with rF1 mAb. Identities of rF1-reactive bands were revealed by mass-spectrometry of the same lysates (see also <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003653#ppat.1003653.s002" target="_blank">Figure S2</a>). (<b>D</b>) Alignment of SDR-proteins revealed by mass-spectrometry from <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>S. epidermidis</i>. SDR-regions are indicated by red hatches. Three truncation mutants of clumping factor A (ClfA) that were fused with maltose-binding protein (MBP) are also shown. (<b>E</b>) SDR-region is sufficient for rF1 reactivity. CWPs from <i>S. aureus</i> expressing truncated recombinant constructs were immunoblotted with anti-MBP mAb or rF1 mAb.</p
mAb rF1 exhibits robust binding to and killing of <i>S. aureus</i> bacteria.
<p>(<b>A-C</b>) Bacteria were preopsonized with huIgG1 mAbs rF1 (squares), 4675 anti-ClfA (triangles), or anti-herpes virus gD (circles). (<b>A</b>) Binding of mAbs to WT (USA300-Δ<i>spa</i>) bacteria was assessed by flow cytometry, and expressed as mean fluorescent intensity (MFI). (<b>B</b>) CFSE-labeled, preopsonized WT (USA300-Δ<i>spa</i>) bacteria were incubated with human PMN. Bacterial uptake was expressed as % of CFSE-positive PMN, after gating for CD11b-positive cells by flow cytometry. (<b>C</b>) Preopsonized WT (USA300-Δ<i>spa</i>) bacteria were incubated with PMN to assess bacterial killing. Numbers of viable CFU per mL are representative of at least three experiments. (<b>D</b>) Flow cytometry analysis of binding of rF1 to <i>S. aureus</i> from various infected tissues. Homogenized tissues were double stained with mAb rF1 (X-axis), and with anti-peptidoglycan mAb 702 to distinguish bacteria from tissue debris (Y-axis) (left panel; gate indicated by arrow), followed by gating of bacteria to generate histogram figures. (<b>E</b>) Binding of rF1 to various staphylococcal and non-staphylococcal Gram-positive bacterial species by flow cytometry. <i>Red lines</i>, rF1; <i>blue lines</i>, isotype control mAb anti-gD; <i>green lines</i>, control without mAb. (See also <a href="http://www.plospathogens.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003653#ppat.1003653.s001" target="_blank">Figure S1</a>).</p
Strains, plasmids, and antibodies.
<p>Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>; MSSA, methicillin-sensitive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>; VISA, vancomycin intermediate-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>; mAb, monoclonal antibody. *NARSA, network on Antibiotic Resistance in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (NARSA) Program supported under NIAID/NIH Contract No. HHSN272200700055C.</p