Influência dos níveis de prolactina e tamanho tumoral na função hipofisária pós-operatória em macroadenomas hipofisários clinicamente não-funcionantes Influence of hyperprolactinemia and tumoral size in the postoperative pituitary function in clinically nonfuncioning pituitary macroadenomas

OBJETIVO: Estudar a influência da hiperprolactinemia e de tamanho tumoral na função hipofisária em macroadenomas hipofisários clinicamente não funcionantes. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados 23 pacientes com macroadenomas hipofisários clinicamente não funcionantes, com exames de imagem (tomografia computadorizada ou ressonância magnética) e dosagens hormonais basais; 16 tinham provas de função hipotálamo-hipofisária (megateste) pré-operatórios. Todos os tumores tiveram diagnóstico histológico e em 17 foi realizado também estudo imuno-histoquímico para os hormônios adeno-hipofisários. A análise estatística foi feita por meio dos testes t de Student, qui-quadrado, exato de Fisher e de Mc Neman. O nível de significância adotado foi 5% (pOBJECTIVE: To study the influence of hyperprolactinemia and tumoral size in the pituitary function in clinically nonfuncioning pituitary macroadenomas. METHODS: Twenty three patients with clinically nonfuncioning pituitary macroadenomas were evaluated by image studies (computed tomography or magnetic resonance) and basal hormonal level; 16 had preoperative hypothalamus-hypophysial function tests (megatests). All tumors had histological diagnosis and in seventeen immunohistochemical study for adenohypophysial hormones was also performed. Student's t test, chi square test, exact test of Fisher and Mc Neman test were used for the statistics analysis . The level of significance adopted was 5% (p<0.05). RESULTS: Tumoral diameter varied of 1.1 to 4.7 cm (average=2.99 cm ± 1.04). In the preoperative, 5 (21.7%) patients did not show laboratorial hormonal deficit, 9 (39.1%) developed hyperprolactinemia, 13 (56,5%) normal levels of prolactin (PRL) and 1 (4.3%) subnormal; 18 (78.3%) patients developed hypopituitarism (4 pan-hypopituitarism). Nineteen patients (82.6%) underwent transsfenoidal approach, 3 (13%) craniotomy and 1 (4.4%) combined access. Only 6 patients had total tumoral resection. Of the 17 immunohistochemical studies, 5 tumours were immunonegatives, 1 compound, 1 LH+, 1 FSH +, 1 alpha sub-unit and 8 focal or isolated immunorreactivity for one of the pituitary hormones or sub-units; of the other six tumours, 5 were chromophobe and 1 chromophobe/acidophile. No significanct statistic difference was noted between tumoral size and preoperative PRL levels (p=0.82), nor between tumoral size and postoperative hormonal state, except in the GH and gonadal axis. Significant statistic was noted: between tumoral size and preoperative hormonal state (except in the gonadal axis); between normal PRL levels, associated to none or little preoperative hypophysial disfunction, and recovery of postoperative pituitary function. CONCLUSION: Isolated preoperative hyperprolactinemia and tumoral size have not been predictible for the recovery of postoperative pituitary function