DNA methylation patterns in bladder cancer and washing cell sediments: a perspective for tumor recurrence detection

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Epigenetic alterations are a hallmark of human cancer. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether aberrant DNA methylation of cancer-associated genes is related to urinary bladder cancer recurrence.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A set of 4 genes, including <it>CDH1 </it>(E-cadherin), <it>SFN </it>(stratifin), <it>RARB </it>(retinoic acid receptor, beta) and <it>RASSF1A </it>(Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family 1), had their methylation patterns evaluated by MSP (Methylation-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction) analysis in 49 fresh urinary bladder carcinoma tissues (including 14 cases paired with adjacent normal bladder epithelium, 3 squamous cell carcinomas and 2 adenocarcinomas) and 24 cell sediment samples from bladder washings of patients classified as cancer-free by cytological analysis (control group). A third set of samples included 39 archived tumor fragments and 23 matched washouts from 20 urinary bladder cancer patients in post-surgical monitoring. After genomic DNA isolation and sodium bisulfite modification, methylation patterns were determined and correlated with standard clinic-histopathological parameters.</p> <p>Results</p> <p><it>CDH1 </it>and <it>SFN </it>genes were methylated at high frequencies in bladder cancer as well as in paired normal adjacent tissue and exfoliated cells from cancer-free patients. Although no statistically significant differences were found between <it>RARB </it>and <it>RASSF1A </it>methylation and the clinical and histopathological parameters in bladder cancer, a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 71% were observed for <it>RARB </it>methylation (Fisher's Exact test (p < 0.0001; OR = 48.89) and, 58% and 17% (p < 0.05; OR = 0.29) for <it>RASSF1A </it>gene, respectively, in relation to the control group.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Indistinct DNA hypermethylation of <it>CDH1 </it>and <it>SFN </it>genes between tumoral and normal urinary bladder samples suggests that these epigenetic features are not suitable biomarkers for urinary bladder cancer. However, <it>RARB </it>and <it>RASSF1A </it>gene methylation appears to be an initial event in urinary bladder carcinogenesis and should be considered as defining a panel of differentially methylated genes in this neoplasia in order to maximize the diagnostic coverage of epigenetic markers, especially in studies aiming at early recurrence detection.</p

Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil: setting the baseline knowledge on the animal diversity in Brazil

The limited temporal completeness and taxonomic accuracy of species lists, made available in a traditional manner in scientific publications, has always represented a problem. These lists are invariably limited to a few taxonomic groups and do not represent up-to-date knowledge of all species and classifications. In this context, the Brazilian megadiverse fauna is no exception, and the Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil (CTFB) (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/), made public in 2015, represents a database on biodiversity anchored on a list of valid and expertly recognized scientific names of animals in Brazil. The CTFB is updated in near real time by a team of more than 800 specialists. By January 1, 2024, the CTFB compiled 133,691 nominal species, with 125,138 that were considered valid. Most of the valid species were arthropods (82.3%, with more than 102,000 species) and chordates (7.69%, with over 11,000 species). These taxa were followed by a cluster composed of Mollusca (3,567 species), Platyhelminthes (2,292 species), Annelida (1,833 species), and Nematoda (1,447 species). All remaining groups had less than 1,000 species reported in Brazil, with Cnidaria (831 species), Porifera (628 species), Rotifera (606 species), and Bryozoa (520 species) representing those with more than 500 species. Analysis of the CTFB database can facilitate and direct efforts towards the discovery of new species in Brazil, but it is also fundamental in providing the best available list of valid nominal species to users, including those in science, health, conservation efforts, and any initiative involving animals. The importance of the CTFB is evidenced by the elevated number of citations in the scientific literature in diverse areas of biology, law, anthropology, education, forensic science, and veterinary science, among others

B) Positive cytology illustrating a tumor recurrent case during the post-surgical monitoring

× 400, Giemsa staining. C) Comparative MSP results from case 11 in tumor tissue (TCC) and in the exfoliated cells from the correspondent bladder washing for and genes. M – methylated allele; U – unmethylated allele. D) Distribution of MSP results among the third set of samples including 39 archived tumor fragments and 23 matched washouts from 20 urinary bladder cancer patients in post-surgical monitoring and comparison with the cytological analysis.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "DNA methylation patterns in bladder cancer and washing cell sediments: a perspective for tumor recurrence detection"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/238</p><p>BMC Cancer 2008;8():238-238.</p><p>Published online 14 Aug 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2527332.</p><p></p

M – methylated allele; U – unmethylated allele; N – normal tissue; T – tumoral tissue

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "DNA methylation patterns in bladder cancer and washing cell sediments: a perspective for tumor recurrence detection"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/8/238</p><p>BMC Cancer 2008;8():238-238.</p><p>Published online 14 Aug 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2527332.</p><p></p