Validation of a rapid, non-radioactive method to quantify internalisation of G-protein coupled receptors

Agonist exposure can cause internalisation of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which may be a part of desensitisation but also of cellular signaling. Previous methods to study internalisation have been tedious or only poorly quantitative. Therefore, we have developed and validated a quantitative method using a sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor as a model. Because of a lack of suitable binding studies, it has been difficult to study S1P receptor internalisation. Using a N-terminal HisG-tag, S1P1 receptors on the cell membrane can be visualised via immunocytochemistry with a specific anti-HisG antibody. S1P-induced internalisation was concentration dependent and was quantified using a microplate reader, detecting either absorbance, a fluorescent or luminescent signal, depending on the antibodies used. Among those, the fluorescence detection method was the most convenient to use. The relative ease of this method makes it suitable to measure a large number of data points, e.g. to compare the potency and efficacy of receptor ligands

Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signalling: focus on the cardiovascular system and regulator of G protein signalling proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in many biological processes. Therefore, GPCR function is tightly controlled both at receptor level and at the level of signalling components. Well-known mechanisms by which GPCR function can be regulated comprise desensitization/resensitization processes and GPCR up- and downregulation. GPCR function can also be regulated by several proteins that directly interact with the receptor and thereby modulate receptor activity. An additional mechanism by which receptor signalling is regulated involves an emerging class of proteins, the so-called regulators of G protein signalling (RGS). In this review we will describe some of these control mechanisms in more detail with some specific examples in the cardiovascular system. In addition, we will provide an overview on RGS proteins and the involvement of RGS proteins in cardiovascular functio

S1P receptor signalling and RGS proteins; expression and function in vascular smooth muscle cells and transfected CHO cells

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) signalling via G protein-coupled receptors is important for the regulation of cell function and differentiation. Specific Regulators of G protein Signalling (RGS) proteins modulate the function of these receptors in many cell types including vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Therefore, we investigated the role of altered expression levels of RGS proteins in S1P receptor function in VSMCs and transfected CHO cells. The mRNA expression of the S1P(1) receptor, RGS4 and RGS16 were down-regulated in VSMCs during phenotypic modulation induced by culturing, whereas mRNA levels of RGS2, RGS3, S1P(2) and S1P(3) receptors were unchanged. Interestingly, the expression level of RGS5 was transiently up-regulated. Despite major alterations in RGS levels, S1P-induced calcium elevation in VSMCs was not altered. Co-transfection of RGS2, RGS3, RGS4, RGS5 and RGS16 into CHO-Flp-In cells stably expressing the S1P(1) or S1P(3) receptor did not modify S1P-induced inhibition of cAMP accumulation to a major extent. Similar results were obtained with SEW2871, a selective S1P(1) receptor agonist. However, the inhibition of cAMP accumulation by the agonist FTY720-P via the S1P(1) receptor was significantly decreased by co-transfection with RGS5. These results indicate that mRNA of the S1P(1) receptor, RGS4, RGS5 and RGS16 is differentially regulated during phenotypic modulation. However, major alterations in RGS protein expression have only limited effect on S1P receptor functio

Sphingosine kinase-dependent activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by angiotensin II

OBJECTIVE: In addition to their role in programmed cell death, cell survival, and cell growth, sphingolipid metabolites such as ceramide, sphingosine, and sphingosine-1-phosphate have vasoactive properties. Besides their occurrence in blood, they can also be formed locally in the vascular wall itself in response to external stimuli. This study was performed to investigate whether vasoactive compounds modulate sphingolipid metabolism in the vascular wall and how this might contribute to the vascular responses. METHODS AND RESULTS: In isolated rat carotid arteries, the contractile responses to angiotensin II are enhanced by the sphingosine kinase inhibitor dimethylsphingosine. Endothelium removal or NO synthase inhibition by N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine results in a similar enhancement. Angiotensin II concentration-dependently induces NO production in an endothelial cell line, which can be diminished by dimethylsphingosine. Using immunoblotting and intracellular calcium measurements, we demonstrate that this sphingosine kinase-dependent endothelial NO synthase activation is mediated via both phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and calcium-dependent pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Angiotensin II induces a sphingosine kinase-dependent activation of endothelial NO synthase, which partially counteracts the contractile responses in isolated artery preparations. This pathway may be of importance under pathological circumstances with reduced NO bioavailability. Moreover, a disturbed sphingolipid metabolism in the vascular wall may lead to reduced NO bioavailability and endothelial dysfunctio