Analyzing non-sentinel axillary metastases in patients with T3–T4 cN0 early breast cancer and tumor-involved sentinel lymph nodes undergoing breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy

Purpose!#!In the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, completing axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) did not benefit patients with T1-T2 cN0 early breast cancer and 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCT). This paper reports cALND rates in the clinical routine for patients who had higher (T3-T4) tumor stages and/or underwent mastectomy but otherwise met the ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria. Aim of this study is to determine cALND time trends and non-sentinel axillary metastases (NSAM) rates to estimate occult axillary tumor burden.!##!Methods!#!Data were included from patients treated in 179 German breast cancer centers between 2008 and 2015. Time-trend rates were analyzed for cALND of patients with T3-T4 tumors separated for BCT and mastectomy and regarding presence of axillary macrometastases or micrometastases.!##!Results!#!Data were available for 188,909 patients, of whom 19,009 were identified with 1-2 positive SLN. Those 19,009 patients were separated into 4 cohorts: (1) Patients with T1-T2 tumors receiving BCT (ACOSOG Z0011 eligible; n = 13,741), (2) T1-T2 with mastectomy (n = 4093), (3) T3-T4 with BCT (n = 269), (4) T3-T4 with mastectomy (n = 906). Among patients with T3-T4 tumors, cALND rates declined from 2008 to 2015: from 88.2 to 62.6% for patients receiving mastectomy and from 96.6 to 58.1% in patients receiving BCT. Overall rates for any NSAM after cALND for cohorts 1-4 were 33.4%, 42.3%, 46.9%, 58.8%, respectively.!##!Conclusions!#!The cALND rates have decreased substantially in routine care in patients with 'extended' ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria. Axillary tumor burden is higher in these patients than in the ACOSOG Z0011 trial

Do hospital type or caseload make a difference in chemotherapy treatment patterns for early breast cancer? Results from 104 German institutions, 2008–2017

Background: Over the past decade, chemotherapy has been used more selectively in early breast cancer (EBC) due to better risk stratification. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has evolved to the primary treatment option. The type and size of hospitals is known to have a substantial influence on the kinds of treatment they provide, and therefore on patient outcomes (e.g. rates for pathological complete response, pCR), but it is not yet known how this has affected delivery of chemotherapy for EBC in Germany. Methods: This study analyzed chemotherapy use and pCR rates after NACT for EBC patients treated at 104 German institutions 2008–2017. Institutions were separated into associated hospital type (university hospital; teaching hospital; community hospital) and annual caseload (≤100; 101–250; >250 cases/year). Results: Overall, 124,084 patients were included, of whom 11.6% were treated at university hospitals, 63.1% at teaching hospitals, and 25.3% at community hospitals. In total, 46,274 (37.3%) received chemotherapy, of whom 44,765 had information available about systemic treatment and surgery. From 2008 to 2017, chemotherapy use declined from 48.3% to 36.4% for university hospitals, from 40.7% to 30.3% for teaching hospitals, and from 42.4% to 33.7% for community hospitals. Furthermore, the proportion of NACT increased the most in university hospitals (from 32.0% to 68.1%); whereas, the rate of pCR (defined as ypT0 ypN0) increased irrespective of institutional type. Analyses regarding annual caseload did not show any differences. Conclusions: The results from this large, nationwide cohort reflect a more selective use of chemotherapy in Germany, irrespective of institutional type or case load