Intoxication with therapeutic and illicit drug substances and hospital admission to a Dutch university hospital

BACKGROUND: This article describes the retrospective analysis of the patients who presented with a drug-related intoxication to the emergency department of the Erasmus Medical Centre in 2000. METHODS: Data were collected from the emergency department's electronic database and the medical charts of the patients. RESULTS: A total of 243 patients were seen with a drug-related intoxication caused by ingestion of one or more medical substances, drugs of abuse (DOA) or combinations with alcohol. Mono-intoxication occurred in 58% of the patients, predominantly caused by DOA (56 patients), analgesics (17 patients) or benzodiazepines (14 patients). Benzodiazepines (55 patients), analgesics (42 patients), alcohol (42 patients), DOA (40 patients) and antidepressants (23 patients) were predominant in combined intoxications. More than half of the patients (142) were discharged after being treated in the emergency department and 80 patients were admitted to the wards. Eighteen patients were admitted elsewhere and three patients were lost to follow-up. Eve

Antidote for intoxication due to local anesthetics:New application of fat emulsion for intravenous administration

Local anaesthetics are routinely used for several indications, but despite local administration their use may lead to systemic toxicity. The symptoms include numbness of the tongue, dizziness, tinnitus, visual disturbances, muscle spasms, convulsions, coma, and respiratory and cardiac arrest. Recently, an intravenous lipid emulsion was reported to act as a novel potential antidote for systemic toxicity due to local anaesthetics. We describe the application of this lipid emulsion in a 27-year-old patient with generalized seizures and coma due to local anaesthetic toxicity. She recovered quickly and was responsive again 10 minutes after the intravenous administration of the lipid emulsion.</p

Antidote for intoxication due to local anesthetics:New application of fat emulsion for intravenous administration

Local anaesthetics are routinely used for several indications, but despite local administration their use may lead to systemic toxicity. The symptoms include numbness of the tongue, dizziness, tinnitus, visual disturbances, muscle spasms, convulsions, coma, and respiratory and cardiac arrest. Recently, an intravenous lipid emulsion was reported to act as a novel potential antidote for systemic toxicity due to local anaesthetics. We describe the application of this lipid emulsion in a 27-year-old patient with generalized seizures and coma due to local anaesthetic toxicity. She recovered quickly and was responsive again 10 minutes after the intravenous administration of the lipid emulsion.</p

Haematoma, abscess or meningitis after neuraxial anaesthesia in the USA and the Netherlands: A closed claims analysis

BACKGROUND: Severe complications after neuraxial anaesthesia are rare but potentially devastating. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify characteristics and preventable causes of haematoma, abscess or meningitis after neuraxial anaesthesia. DESIGN: Observational study, closed claims analysis. SETTING: Closed anaesthesia malpractice claims from the USA and the Netherlands were examined from 2007 until 2017. PATIENTS: Claims of patients with haematoma (n = 41), abscess (n = 18) or meningitis (n = 14) associated with neuraxial anaesthesia for labour, acute and chronic pain that initiated and closed between 2007 and 2017 were included. There were no exclusions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We analysed potential preventable causes in patient-related, neuraxial procedure-related, treatment-related and legal characteristics of these complications. RESULTS: Patients experiencing spinal haematoma were predominantly above 60 years of age and using antihaemostatic medication, whereas patients with abscess or meningitis were middle-aged, relatively healthy and more often involved in emergency interventions. Potential preventable causes of unfavourable sequelae constituted errors in timing/prescription of antihaemostatic medication (10 claims, 14%), unsterile procedures (n = 10, 14%) and delay in diagnosis/treatment of the complication (n = 18, 25%). The number of claims resulting in payment was similar between countries (USA n = 15, 38% vs. the Netherlands n = 17, 52%; P = 0.25). The median indemnity payment, which the patient received varied widely between the USA (&OV0556;285 488, n = 14) and the Netherlands (&OV0556;31 031, n = 17) (P = 0.004). However, the considerable differences in legal systems and administration of expenses between countries may make meaningful comparison of indemnity payments inappropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Claims of spinal haematoma were often related to errors in antihaemostatic medication and delay in diagnosis and/or treatment. Spinal abscess claims were related to emergency interventions and lack of sterility. We wish to highlight these potential preventable causes, both when performing the neuraxial procedure and during postprocedural care of patients

Intracranial hematoma and abscess after neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: a review of the literature describing 297 cases

BACKGROUND: Besides spinal complications, intracranial hematoma or abscess may occur after neuraxial block. Risk factors and outcome remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This review evaluates characteristics, treatment and recovery of patients with intracranial complications after neuraxial block. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from their inception to May 2020 for case reports/series, cohort studies and reviews of intracranial hematoma or abscess associated with neuraxial block. Quality of evidence was assessed using the critical appraisal of a case study checklist by Crombie. FINDINGS: We analyzed 232 reports, including 291 patients with hematoma and six patients with abscess/empyema. The major part of included studies comprised single case reports with a high risk of bias. Of the patients with hematoma, 48% concerned obstetric patients, the remainder received neuraxial block for various perioperative indications or pain management. Prior dural puncture was reported in 81%, either intended (eg, spinal anesthesia) or unintended (eg, complicated epidural catheter placement). Headache was described in 217 patients; in 101 patients, symptoms resembled postdural puncture headache (PDPH). After treatment, 11% had partial or no recovery and 8% died, indicating the severity of this complication. Intracranial abscess after neuraxial block is seldom reported; six reports were found. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of intracranial hematoma is often missed initially, as headache is assumed to be caused by cerebrospinal hypotension due to cerebrospinal fluid leakage, known as PDPH. Prolonged headache without improvement, worsening symptoms despite treatment or epidural blood patch, change of headache from postural to non-postural or new neurological signs should alert physicians to alternative diagnoses

Intracranial hematoma and abscess after neuraxial analgesia and anesthesia: A review of the literature describing 297 cases

Background: Besides spinal complications, intracranial hematoma or abscess may occur after neuraxial block. Risk factors and outcome remain unclear. Objective: This review evaluates characteristics, treatment and recovery of patients with intracranial complications after neuraxial block. Evidence review: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from their inception to May 2020 for case reports/series, cohort studies and reviews of intracranial hematoma or abscess associated with neuraxial block. Quality of evidence was assessed using the critical appraisalof a case study checklist by Crombie. Findings: We analyzed 232 reports, including 291 patients with hematoma and six patients with abscess/empyema. The major part of included studies comprised single case reports with a high risk of bias. Of the patients with hematoma, 48% concerned obstetric patients, the remainder received neuraxial block for various perioperative indications or pain management. Prior dural puncture was reported in 81%, either intended (eg, spinal anesthesia) or unintended (eg, complicated epidural catheter placement). Headache was described in 217 patients; in 101 patients, symptoms resembled postdural puncture headache (PDPH). After treatment, 11% had partial or no recovery and 8% died, indicating the severity of this complication. Intracranial abscess after neuraxial block is seldom reported; six reports were found. Conclusion: Diagnosis of intracranial hematoma is often missed initially, as headache is assumed to be caused by cerebrospinal hypotension due to cerebrospinal fluid leakage, known as PDPH. Prolonged headache without improvement, worsening symptoms despite treatment or epidural blood patch, change of headache from postural to non-postural or new neurological signs should alert physicians to alternative diagnoses

Results of Implementing an Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery (ERABS) Protocol

Background: With the increasing prevalence of morbid obesity and healthcare costs in general, interest is shown in safe, efficient, and cost-effective bariatric care. This study describes an Enhanced Recovery After Bariatric Surgery (ERABS) protocol and the results of implementing such protocol on procedural times, length of stay in hospital (LOS), and the number of complications, such as readmissions and reoperations. Methods: Results of implementing an ERABS protocol were analyzed by comparing a cohort treated according to the ERABS protocol (2012–2014) with a cohort treated before implementing ERABS (2010–2012). Differences between both cohorts were analyzed using independent t tests and chi-squared tests. Results: A total of 1.967 patients (mean age 43.3 years, 80 % female) underwent a primary bariatric procedure between 2010 and 2014, of which 1.313 procedures were performed after implementation of ERABS. A significant decrease of procedural times and a significantly decreased LOS, from 3.2 to 2.0 nights (p < 0.001), were seen after implementation of ERABS. Significantly more complications were seen post-ERABS (16.1 vs. 20.7 %, p = 0.013), although no significant differences were seen in the number of major complications. Conclusion: Implementation of ERABS can result in shorter procedural times and a decreased LOS, which may lead to more efficient and cost-effective bariatric care. The increase in complications was possibly due to better registration of complications. The main goal of an ERABS protocol is efficient, safe, and evidence-based bariatric care, which can be achieved by standardization of the total process