Resultados laboratoriais nas doenças virais oculares: implicações na correlação clínico-laboratorial

PURPOSE: To document etiology and predictive value of clinical diagnosis in laboratory confirmed viral diseases. METHODS: Reports of culture-positive cases of samples collected from patients presenting from January 1987 - December 2001 were evaluated. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred and sixty-four (1964) cultures were submitted during 1987-2001. Twenty-six percent were positive (514). Human herpesvirus 1 was the most frequent agent isolated from all positive culture (56%). Adenovirus was the most common virus isolated from conjunctiva (66%), human herpesvirus 1 from lid and cornea (76%, 88%) and cytomegalovirus from vitreous (27%). Some unusual pathogens were recovered from conjunctiva as cytomegalovirus and from cornea as adenovirus, enterovirus and cytomegalovirus. Recognition of common viral syndromes was human herpesvirus 1 (88%), epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (88%), acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (70%) and varicella zoster virus (100%). However, some misdiagnosed cases were observed. Thirteen percent of conjunctivitis thought to be caused by herpes were due to adenovirus, 3.2% to Enterovirus, 3.2% to varicella zoster virus and 3.2% to human cytomegalovirus. Also, 5% of cases with a clinical diagnosis of herpes keratitis were caused by adenovirus and 2.7% by enterovirus. Finally, 4.8% of cases thought to be adenovirus conjunctivitis were herpes conjunctivitis. CONCLUSIONS: Human herpesvirus 1 remains the most frequently isolated virus from ocular sites in general (56%). Nonherpetic corneal isolates were in decreasing order: adenovirus, enterovirus and cytomegalovirus. Clinical and laboratory correlation was less than 90%. The most misdiagnosed cases were herpes conjunctivitis and keratitis, some cases of adenovirus conjunctivitis some cases of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis. It is essential that a rapid and specific diagnosis is offered under atypical viral presentation for the institution of specific antiviral therapy and to avoid complications that can be a result of misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. Also it is important to do viral testing in order to confirm clinical diagnosis, report emerging infections, resistance and change in the epidemiology.OBJETIVOS: Documentar a etiologia e prever a importância do diagnóstico clínico em doenças virais oculares confirmadas em laboratório. MÉTODOS: Todos os relatórios de pacientes com cultura viral positiva durante o período de janeiro 1987 - dezembro 2001 foram analisados. RESULTADOS: Quinhentos e quatorze (514) casos foram encontrados. Em geral, herpesvírus 1 humano foi o agente mais freqüentemente isolado. Adenovírus foi o vírus mais comumente isolado da conjuntiva (66%), herpesvírus 1 humano das pálpebras e córnea (76%, 88% respectivamente) e citomegalovírus do vítreo (27%). Alguns agentes não usuais foram isolados da conjuntiva como citomegalovírus e da córnea como adenovírus, enterovírus e citomegalovírus. Reconhecimento das síndromes virais comuns foi: herpervírus 1 humano (88%), ceratoconjuntivite epidêmica (88%), conjuntivite aguda hemorrágica (70%). Porém, alguns casos com diagnóstico incorreto foram observados. Treze por cento das conjuntivites com diagnóstico de herpes foram causadas por adenovírus, 3,2% por enterovírus, 3,2% por varicella zoster vírus e 3,2% por citomegalovírus. Também, 5% dos casos com diagnóstico clínico de ceratite herpética eram adenovírus e 2,7% enterovírus. Além disso, 4,8% dos casos em que se pensaram em conjuntivite por adenovírus, eram conjuntivite por herpes. Finalmente, 30% dos casos em que se diagnosticaram conjuntive hemorrágica aguda, o agente etiológico era adenovírus. CONCLUSÃO: Em geral herpesvírus humano 1 continua a ser o vírus mais comum encontrado nas infecções oculares (56%). Agentes não herpéticos isolados da córnea foram em ordem decrescente: adenovírus, enterovírus e citomegalovírus. A correlação entre o diagnóstico clínico e laboratorial foi menor do que 90%. Um diagnóstico rápido e específico é essencial em casos de apresentações virais atípicas para que uma terapia antiviral específica seja estabelecida e para se evitar complicações que podem ser decorrentes de um diagnóstico errado e tratamento inadequado. Teste viral também é importante para se confirmar um diagnóstico clínico, relatar infecções emergentes e mudanças de epidemiologia.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Universidade de Miami Bascom Palmer Eye InstituteUNIFESPSciEL

Impact of prior therapy on the recovery and frequency of corneal pathogens

To document the impact of prior antibiotic therapy on the recovery of corneal pathogens. Medical records and laboratory reports of 334 consecutive microbial keratitis patients examined from January to December 2000 were reviewed. Comparisons of pathogens, culture positive rate, recovery time, antibiotic sensitivity profile, delay in presentation, and final visual acuity were analyzed for patients treated before presentation and those who were not. The chi square test was used to determine statistical significance. Of the 334 patients, 56% were exposed to at least one course of topical antimicrobials before culture. Patients on therapy were only slightly more likely to be culture negative (P = 0.317) but significantly more likely to have a delay in pathogen recovery (P = 0.002). Patients given prior antibiotics took significantly longer to heal (P = 0.003). Gram-negative organisms (47.5%) were the most frequent pathogens isolated from all culture-positive patients, followed by gram positives (28.7%), fungi (15.8%), and parasites (2%). An increase and significant difference in the frequency of fungi (P = 0.000) and acanthamoeba was reserved for the pretreated group. Gram negative organisms were more often isolated from patients who had not been pretreated (P = 0.002). Pretreated patients were more like to have a pathogen resistant to 1 or more of the commonly prescribed ocular antibiotics (P = 0.02). There is a delay in starting microbiologic-guided antibiotic treatment in patients who have received empiric therapy. Nonbacterial corneal pathogens may be associated more frequently with patients on prior therapy

Incidence of microbial infection after amniotic membrane transplantation

To report the incidence and characteristics of microbial infection following amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT). We retrieved the clinical and microbiological records of a total of 326 patients undergoing AMT from January 1994 to February 2001 at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute to determine the incidence and characteristics of post-AMT infections with respect to the interval between AMT and the time of microbial culturing, types of organisms, and clinical outcomes and to correlate these infections with the microbiologic results of AM storage media submitted immediately after AMT and the underlying ocular diagnosis. We subdivided these 326 patients into two groups: 76 patients (from January 1994 to June 1998) used AM prepared from a research laboratory and did not submit AM storage media for culture under an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol, and 250 patients thereafter used AM obtained from a commercial source and routinely submitted AM storage media for culture. A total of 11 culture-positive infections (3.4%) were identified, and among them 7 infections (9.2%) were from the first group, and 4 (1.6%) were from the second group (P = 0.004). All 4 infections (5.2%) occurring within 1 month after AMT were exclusively from the first group (P = 0.003). All AM storage media from the second group were culture negative. Gram-positive organisms were the most frequent isolate (64%). Infections were not correlated with the underlying ocular diagnosis. AMT is a safe method for ocular surface reconstruction with a very low rate of microbial infections, especially if AM is prepared according to Good Tissue Banking Practice set forth by FDA. Gram-positive isolates seem to be the most frequent isolates in infections after AMT