Novel investigations and treatment outcomes in systemic AL amyloidosis

Background Systemic AL amyloidosis (AL) is a potentially fatal disorder characterised by fibrillary deposition of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains within organs. Outcomes in AL have improved, but ~20% of patients die within six months of diagnosis. Aims Since upfront bortezomib-based therapy is the mainstay of contemporary AL management, I aim to assess outcomes with this therapy in a large UK cohort. Within this cohort, I shall explore the impact of achieving a ‘stringent’ light chain response. I also aim to explore outcomes in AL patients with advanced cardiac involvement, and patients who do not achieve early haematological responses to upfront therapy. Few AL patients are eligible for upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) due to advanced cardiac involvement, and I shall explore the role of deferred ASCT in initially transplant-ineligible patients. I shall examine treatment outcomes with rituximab-bendamustine in IgM-associated AL. AL patients with severe neuropathic involvement have limited chemotherapeutic options, and I shall assess outcomes with the second-generation proteasome inhibitor, carfilzomib, in such patients. The final aim of this thesis is to perform a pilot study of 18F-florbetapir, a novel imaging tracer, in cardiac AL. Results and conclusion Bortezomib-based therapy results in good overall survival and time-to-next-treatment in AL. A ‘stringent’ light chain response predicts prolonged time-to-next-treatment and excellent organ responses. Patients who do not achieve early haematological responses with bortezomib can still go on to achieve excellent haematological responses. AL patients with advanced cardiac involvement who achieve rapid, deep haematological responses have survival outcomes that are better than previously reported. Deferred ASCT is a potential treatment option in initially transplant-ineligible AL patients. Rituximab-bendamustine induces good haematological responses in IgM-associated AL. Carfilzomib is an effective treatment option in AL patients with significant neuropathic involvement. 18F-florbetapir PET is associated with cardiac uptake in AL patients with cardiac involvement

Prognostic importance of the 6 min walk test in light chain (AL) amyloidosis

OBJECTIVES: In AL amyloidosis, organ response assessment is based on surrogates (eg, cardiac biomarkers). An objective functional test, such as the 6 min walk test (6MWT), capturing overall clinical improvement, is required. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the 6MWT at baseline and change following chemotherapy. METHODS: This study evaluated the outcomes of patients who enrolled in a prospective observational study at the UK National Amyloidosis Centre (2012-2017). Patients underwent comprehensive assessments inclusive of blood testing, echocardiogram and 6MWT at baseline and annually thereafter. RESULTS: In total, 799 patients were included within the study. Median baseline 6 min walk distance (6MWD) was 362 m (IQR: 231 m). 6MWD progressively decreased with worsening cardiac disease stage (458 m, 404 m, 331 m and 168 m for cardiac Mayo stages I, II, IIIa and IIIb, respectively (p<0.0001)). In patients with a baseline 6MWT of ≥350 m, the median overall survival was not reached (vs 30.0 (95% CI 23.2 to 36.8) months if <350 m and 5.0 (95% CI 2.8 to 7.2) months if unable to attempt 6MWT (p<0.0001). Following chemotherapy, only patients in a complete haematological response improved their 6MWD by 12 months (p=0.001). Improvement in 6MWD prolonged survival in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: The 6MWT is prognostic in AL amyloidosis. A baseline distance of ≥350 m independently predicts better survival. These data suggest that 6MWT has utility in AL amyloidosis for baseline prognosis and assessing response

Longitudinal strain is an independent predictor of survival and response to therapy in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis

AIMS: Cardiac involvement, a major determinant of prognosis in AL (light-chain immunoglobulin) amyloidosis, is characterized by an impairment of longitudinal strain (LS%). We sought to evaluate the utility of LS% in a prospectively observed series of patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 915 serial newly diagnosed AL patients with comprehensive baseline assessments, inclusive of echocardiography, were included. A total of 628/915 (68.6%) patients had cardiac involvement. The LS% worsened with advancing cardiac stage with mean −21.1%, −17.1%, −12.9%, and −12.1% for stages I, II, IIIa, and IIIb, respectively (P < 0.0001). There was a highly significant worsening of overall survival (OS) with worsening LS% quartile: LS% ≤−16.2%: 80 months, −16.1% to −12.2%: 36 [95% confidence interval (CI) 20.9–51.1] months, −12.1% to −9.1%: 22 (95% CI 9.1–34.9) months, and ≥−9.0%: 5 (95% CI 3.2–6.8) months (P < 0.0001). Improvement in LS% was seen at 12 months in patients achieving a haematological complete response (CR) (median improvement from −13.8% to −14.9% in those with CR and difference between involved and uninvolved light chain <10 mg/L). Strain improvement was associated with improved OS (median not reached at 53 months vs. 72 months in patients without strain improvement, P = 0.007). Patients achieving an LS% improvement and a standard N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide-based cardiac response survived longer than those achieving a biomarker-based cardiac response alone (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Baseline LS% is a functional marker that correlates with worsening cardiac involvement and is predictive of survival. Baseline LS% and an absolute improvement in LS% are useful additional measures of prognosis and response to therapy in cardiac AL amyloidosis, respectively

Linking changes in quality of life to haematologic response and survival in systemic immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis

This study reports health-related quality of life (HRQL) among newly-diagnosed immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) patients (n = 914) treated with a bortezomib-based regimen and its association with response depth and survival. Haematologic response/HRQL were assessed over 24 months in an ongoing, prospective study. HRQL change was calculated across haematologic/cardiac response levels. The relationship between baseline HRQL and survival was evaluated by the Cox proportional-hazard model (PH). Shared-random-effects models (SREMs) estimated time-to-death conditional on current HRQL/longitudinal HRQL trajectory. At 3 months, there was consistent decline in 5/8 HRQL domains across all haematologic response levels. By 12 months, 3/5 declining domains improved among complete response (CR) patients. In contrast, the mean change in less-than-CR patients did not indicate improvement. Under the Cox PH, having a baseline HRQL score five points higher than the sample mean was associated with 20% lower mortality risk. SREMs indicated a five-point greater HRQL score at the event time correlated with an approximately 30% decrease in mortality risk. For each one-point increase in HRQL score trajectory slope, mortality risk decreased by approximately 88%. Only CR patients had HRQL improvement, while partial response patients had less decline but no meaningful improvements. These data show the importance of HRQL serial assessments of AL patients and its importance as an end-point

Phase I/II results of ceralasertib as monotherapy or in combination with acalabrutinib in high-risk relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have limited treatment options. Ceralasertib, a selective ataxia telangiectasia and Rad-3-related protein (ATR) inhibitor, demonstrated synergistic preclinical activity with a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor in TP53- and ATM-defective CLL cells. Acalabrutinib is a selective BTK inhibitor approved for treatment of CLL. Objectives: To evaluate ceralasertib ± acalabrutinib in R/R CLL. Design: Nonrandomized, open-label phase I/II study. Methods: In arm A, patients received ceralasertib monotherapy 160 mg twice daily (BID) continuously (cohort 1) or 2 weeks on/2 weeks off (cohort 2). In arm B, patients received acalabrutinib 100 mg BID continuously (cycle 1), followed by combination treatment with ceralasertib 160 mg BID 1 week on/3 weeks off from cycle 2. Co-primary objectives were safety and pharmacokinetics. Efficacy was a secondary objective. Results: Eleven patients were treated [arm A, n = 8 (cohort 1, n = 5; cohort 2, n = 3); arm B, n = 3 (acalabrutinib plus ceralasertib, n = 2; acalabrutinib only, n = 1)]. Median duration of exposure was 3.5 and 7.2 months for ceralasertib in arms A and B, respectively, and 15.9 months for acalabrutinib in arm B. Most common grade ⩾3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in arm A were anemia (75%) and thrombocytopenia (63%), with four dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of grade 4 thrombocytopenia. No grade ⩾3 TEAEs or DLTs occurred in arm B. Ceralasertib plasma concentrations were similar when administered as monotherapy or in combination. At median follow-up of 15.1 months in arm A, no responses were observed, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 16.9 months. At median follow-up of 17.2 months in arm B, overall response rate was 100%, and median PFS and OS were not reached. Conclusion: Ceralasertib alone showed limited clinical benefit. Acalabrutinib plus ceralasertib was tolerable with preliminary activity in patients with R/R CLL, though findings are inconclusive due to small sample size. Registration: NCT0332827