Dinamika Pembebanan Jaminan Fidusia Terkait Dengan Prinsip Spesialitas

The principle of specializing fiduciary guarantees in consumer financing agreements is one of the principles that must be fulfilled, in order to provide legal certainty to both fiduciary recipients and fiduciary recipients, particularly regarding the right to ownership of collateral. If the consumer financing agreement is not fulfilled by the principle of specialization, then there is no legal certainty in the agreement. Every object that is burdened with a fiduciary guarantee must be registered at the fiduciary registration office for the birth of the fiduciary guarantee. A new fiduciary guarantee is said to be born if it has been registered so that a fiduciary certificate is issued which has executive power if in the future the debtor defaults. So that the creditor in the settlement of default is not based on a power of attorney but based on a fiduciary certificate which has the same strength as a court decision that has permanent legal force. The methodology used in this study is the normative juridical methodology and the approach used is a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The thinking framework used is descriptive method in this study. Conclusion: Based on the consumer financing agreement issued by the consumer financing institution, it can be concluded that the consumer financing agreement does not provide a fiduciary guarantee. A fiduciary guarantee is born if the object encumbered with the fiduciary guarantee has been registered at the regional office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in the province. Consumer financing agreements issued by consumer financing institutions do not fulfill the principle of legal specialization of material guarantees. Based on the definition of the principle of specialization, security rights, fiduciary rights and mortgages can only be imposed on goods that have been registered in the name of a certain person. KEYWORDS:: SKMHT, Time Limit, Creditors

Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual Akibat Wanprestasi oleh Para Pelaku Usaha Ekonomi Kreatif

The objects of debt collateral are generally objects that have a exists for (tangible asset) such as land, buildings, vehicles and so on. However, in Law concerning the Creative Economy, precisely in Article 16, it is explained that the government facilitates intellectual property-based financing schemes that have economic value for creative economy business actors which will be further regulated in a government regulation. In terms of supporting the use of intellectual property as collateral objects to obtain credit, the government issued Government Regulation no. 24 of 2019 concerning Implementing Regulations of Law concerning the Creative Economy. So that creative economy actors in this case can take advantage of these facilities to develop their potential. Based on this background, the author formulates two problem formulations, namely: how are intellectual property rights (IPR) regulated for creative economy businesses as objects of debt collateral? What are the resolution efforts if a dispute occurs due to default by creative economy business actors? This thesis research uses normative juridical methods with a statutory approach (statue approach) and conceptual approaches. The legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials using the library study method of collecting legal materials with research analysis using deductive methods

Legal Protection For Aku Papua Song Writer That Has Been Cover At The Opening Of PON 2021

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan memahami perlindungan hukum bagi pencipta lagu Aku Papua yang di cover ulang dan digunakan oleh penyanyi tanpa izin pencipta di PON. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penulisan yuridis normatif dimana setiap persoalan yang diangkat, dibahas dan diuraikan dalam penelitian ini menitikberatkan pada kaidah dan norma hukum positif. Sedangkan dalam pendekatan masalah yang digunakan, penulis menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk perlindungan hukum yang diberikan oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta adalah perlindungan hukum internal yang diatur dalam Pasal 80-82 Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan perlindungan hukum eksternal yang diatur dalam Pasal 112,113, dan 116. Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Munculnya masalah bisa menjadi perselisihan. Sengketa yang terjadi harus diselesaikan oleh para pihak. Penyelesaian sengketa dapat diselesaikan melalui litigasi dan non litigasi. Penyelesaian sengketa litigasi merupakan penyelesaian sengketa melalui pengadilan, sedangkan penyelesaian sengketa non litigasi merupakan penyelesaian sengketa yang dilakukan di luar pengadilan