119 research outputs found
(E)-5-(2-Thienylmethyleneamino)quinolin-8-ol
Two molecules of the title compound, C14H10N2OS, are hydrogen bonded about a center of inversion. In the molecule, the two aromatic rings are twisted by 37.27 (5)° with respect to one another. The azomethine bond is in the E configuration
Evaluation of a new arterial pressure-based cardiac output device requiring no external calibration
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Several techniques have been discussed as alternatives to the intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output (CO<sub>PAC</sub>) measurement by the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). However, these techniques usually require a central venous line, an additional catheter, or a special calibration procedure. A new arterial pressure-based cardiac output (CO<sub>AP</sub>) device (FloTrac™, Vigileo™; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) only requires access to the radial or femoral artery using a standard arterial catheter and does not need an external calibration. We validated this technique in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) using CO<sub>PAC </sub>as the method of reference.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We studied 20 critically ill patients, aged 16 to 74 years (mean, 55.5 ± 18.8 years), who required both arterial and pulmonary artery pressure monitoring. CO<sub>PAC </sub>measurements were performed at least every 4 hours and calculated as the average of 3 measurements, while CO<sub>AP </sub>values were taken immediately at the end of bolus determinations. Accuracy of measurements was assessed by calculating the bias and limits of agreement using the method described by Bland and Altman.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>A total of 164 coupled measurements were obtained. Absolute values of CO<sub>PAC </sub>ranged from 2.80 to 10.80 l/min (mean 5.93 ± 1.55 l/min). The bias and limits of agreement between CO<sub>PAC </sub>and CO<sub>AP </sub>for unequal numbers of replicates was 0.02 ± 2.92 l/min. The percentage error between CO<sub>PAC </sub>and CO<sub>AP </sub>was 49.3%. The bias between percentage changes in CO<sub>PAC </sub>(ΔCO<sub>PAC</sub>) and percentage changes in CO<sub>AP </sub>(ΔCO<sub>AP</sub>) for consecutive measurements was -0.70% ± 32.28%. CO<sub>PAC </sub>and CO<sub>AP </sub>showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.58 (<it>p </it>< 0.01), while the correlation coefficient between ΔCO<sub>PAC </sub>and ΔCO<sub>AP </sub>was 0.46 (<it>p </it>< 0.01).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Although the CO<sub>AP </sub>algorithm shows a minimal bias with CO<sub>PAC </sub>over a wide range of values in an inhomogeneous group of critically ill patients, the scattering of the data remains relative wide. Therefore, the used algorithm (V 1.03) failed to demonstrate an acceptable accuracy in comparison to the clinical standard of cardiac output determination.</p
Tackling the economic burden of postsurgical complications: would perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy help?
Roadmap on holography
From its inception holography has proven an extremely productive and attractive area of research. While specific technical applications give rise to 'hot topics', and three-dimensional (3D) visualisation comes in and out of fashion, the core principals involved continue to lead to exciting innovations in a wide range of areas. We humbly submit that it is impossible, in any journal document of this type, to fully reflect current and potential activity; however, our valiant contributors have produced a series of documents that go no small way to neatly capture progress across a wide range of core activities. As editors we have attempted to spread our net wide in order to illustrate the breadth of international activity. In relation to this we believe we have been at least partially successful
- …