Personalizing Breast Cancer Screening Based on Polygenic Risk and Family History

_Background:_ We assessed the clinical utility of a first-degree breast cancer family history and polygenic risk score (PRS) to inform screening decisions among women aged 30-50 years. _Methods:_ Two established breast cancer models evaluated digital mammography screening strategies in the 1985 US birth cohort by risk groups defined by family history and PRS based on 313 single nucleotide polymorphisms. Strategies varied in initiation age and interval. The benefits and harms were compared with those seen with 3 established screening guidelines. _Results:_ Women with a breast cancer family history who initiated biennial screening at age 40 years had a 36% increase in life-years gained and 20% more breast cancer deaths averted, but 21% more overdiagnoses and 63% more false positives. Screening tailored to PRS vs biennial screening from50 to 74 years had smaller positive effects on life-years gained and breast cancer deaths averted but also smaller increases in overdiagnoses and false positives. Combined use of family history and PRS vs biennial screening from 50 to 74 years had the greatest increase in life-years gained and breast cancer deaths averted. _Conclusions:_ Our results suggest that breast cancer family history and PRS could guide screening decisions before age 50 years among women at increased risk for breast cancer but expected increases in overdiagnoses and false positives should be expected

Detecting Architectural Distortion in Mammograms Using a Gabor Filtered Probability Map Algorithm

Part 8: Third Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Biomedicine (AIAB 2013)International audienceBreast Cancer is a disease that is prevalent in many countries. Computer-Aided detection (CAD) systems have been developed to assist radiologists in detecting breast cancer. This paper discusses an algorithm for architectural distortion (AD) detection with a better sensitivity than the current CAD systems.19 images containing ADs were preprocessed with a median filter and Gabor filters to extract texture information. AD probability maps were generated using a maximum amplitude map and histogram analysis on the orientation map of the Gabor filter response. AD maps were analyzed to select ROIs as potential AD sites.AD map analysis yielded a sensitivity of 79% (15 out of 19 cases of AD were detected) with a false positive per image (FPI) of 18. Future work involves the development of a second stage in the algorithm to reduce the FPI value and application of the algorithm to a different set of database images

Transition From Film to Digital Mammography Impact for Breast Cancer Screening Through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program

IntroductionThe National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides mammograms and diagnostic services for low-income, uninsured women aged 40–64 years. Mammography facilities within the NBCCEDP gradually shifted from plain-film to digital mammography. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of replacing film with digital mammography on health effects (deaths averted, life-years gained [LYG]); costs (for screening and diagnostics); and number of women reached.MethodsNBCCEDP 2010 data and data representative of the program’s target population were used in two established microsimulation models. Models simulated observed screening behavior including different screening intervals (annual, biennial, irregular) and starting ages (40, 50 years) for white, black, and Hispanic women. Model runs were performed in 2012.ResultsThe models predicted 8.0–8.3 LYG per 1,000 film screens for black women, 5.9–7.5 for white women, and 4.0–4.5 for Hispanic women. For all race/ethnicity groups, digital mammography had more LYG than film mammography (2%–4%), but had higher costs (34%–35%). Assuming a fixed budget, 25%–26% fewer women could be served, resulting in 22%–24% fewer LYG if all mammograms were converted to digital. The loss in LYG could be reversed to an 8%–13% increase by only including biennial screening.ConclusionsDigital could result in slightly more LYG than film mammography. However, with a fixed budget, fewer women may be served with fewer LYG. Changes in the program, such as only including biennial screening, will increase LYG/screen and could offset the potential decrease in LYG when shifting to digital mammography

Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer

BACKGROUND: We used modeling techniques to assess the relative and absolute contributions of screening mammography and adjuvant treatment to the reduction in breast-cancer mortality in the United States from 1975 to 2000. METHODS: A consortium of investigators developed seven independent statistical models of breast-cancer incidence and mortality. All seven groups used the same sources to obtain data on the use of screening mammography, adjuvant treatment, and benefits of treatment with respect to the rate of death from breast cancer. RESULTS: The proportion of the total reduction in the rate of death from breast cancer attributed to screening varied in the seven models from 28 to 65 percent (median, 46 percent), with adjuvant treatment contributing the rest. The variability across models in the absolute contribution of screening was larger than it was for treatment, reflecting the greater uncertainty associated with estimating the benefit of screening. CONCLUSIONS: Seven statistical models showed that both screening mammography and treatment have helped reduce the rate of death from breast cancer in the United States. Copyrigh

Transition from film to digital mammography: Impact for breast cancer screening through the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program

Introduction The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides mammograms and diagnostic services for low-income, uninsured women aged 40-64 years. Mammography facilities within the NBCCEDP gradually shifted from plain-film to digital mammography. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of replacing film with digital mammography on health effects (deaths averted, life-years gained [LYG]); costs (for screening and diagnostics); and number of women reached. Methods NBCCEDP 2010 data and data representative of the program's target population were used in two established microsimulation models. Models simulated observed screening behavior including different screening intervals (annual, biennial, irregular) and starting ages (40, 50 years) for white, black, and Hispanic women. Model runs were performed in 2012. Results The models predicted 8.0-8.3 LYG per 1,000 film screens for black women, 5.9-7.5 for white women, and 4.0-4.5 for Hispanic women. For all race/ethnicity groups, digital mammography had more LYG than film mammography (2%-4%), but had higher costs (34%-35%). Assuming a fixed budget, 25%-26% fewer women could be served, resulting in 22%-24% fewer LYG if all mammograms were converted to digital. The loss in LYG could be reversed to an 8%-13% increase by only including biennial screening. Conclusions Digital could result in slightly more LYG than film mammography. However, with a fixed budget, fewer women may be served with fewer LYG. Changes in the program, such as only including biennial screening, will increase LYG/screen and could offset the potential decrease in LYG when shifting to digital mammography