Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Predictors of Adverse Outcomes in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.

Background Patients with cirrhosis who develop spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) suffer from cirrhotic cardiomyopathy which is characterized by impaired contractility in response to stress despite a relatively normal resting cardiac output. We hypothesized that electrocardiographic and echocardiographic information would help prognosticate patients developing SBP in addition to existing scoring systems. Methods Cirrhotic patients admitted to Einstein Medical Center from 01/01/2005 to 6/30/2012 for SBP, and did not receive a transplant within one year, were included. Patients were classified as QTc low vs. high, and E/E’ low vs. high at cut points ≥480 msec for QTc and ≥10 for E/E’ ratio. We estimated 1 year survival using Kaplan Meier curves. Regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used for QTc and E/E’ ratio respectively for assessing 1 year survival. Results Among 112 patients with electrocardiogam, 78 were classified as QTc low. Among 64 patients with echocardiograms, 23 were classified as E/E’ low. Higher QTc was associated with increased in-hospital acute kidney injury. QTc and E/E’ ratio predicted worse 1 year survival (HR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.29-3.49; HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.31-5.35, respectively) on univariate and multivariate analysis (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; HR = 3.26, 95% CI 1.22-9.82 respectively) after adjusting for both Child Pugh stage, MELD score among other risk factors. Conclusion In conclusion, cirrhotic patients with SBP who present with a prolonged QTc interval are at a greater risk for acute renal failure during hospitalization. High QTc duration and an E/E’ ratio of ≥10 independently predict increased mortality at 1-year follow-up

Clinical utility of the HEART score in patients admitted with chest pain to an inner-city hospital in the USA.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain is one of the most common presentations to a hospital, and appropriate triaging of these patients can be challenging. The HEART score has been used for such purposes in some countries and only a few validation studies from the USA are available. We aim to determine the utility of the HEART score in patients presenting with chest pain to an inner-city hospital in the USA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively screened 417 consecutive patients admitted with chest pain to the observation/telemetry units at Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 299 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were divided into low-risk (0-3) and intermediate-high (≥4)-risk HEART score groups. Baseline characteristics, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score, need for revascularization during index hospitalization, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 6 weeks and 12 months were recorded. RESULTS: There were 98 and 201 patients in the low-score group and intermediate-high-score group, respectively. Compared with the low-score group, patients in the intermediate-high-risk group had a higher incidence of revascularization during the index hospital stay (16.4 vs. 0%; P=0.001), longer hospital stay, higher MACE at 6 weeks (9.5 vs. 0%) and 12 months (20.4 vs. 3.1%), and higher cardiac readmissions. HEART score of at least 4 independently predicted MACE at 12 months (odds ratio 7.456, 95% confidence interval: 2.175-25.56; P=0.001) after adjusting for other risk factors in regression analysis. CONCLUSION: HEART score of at least 4 was predictive of worse outcomes in patients with chest pain in an inner-city USA hospital. If validated in multicenter prospective studies, the HEART score could potentially be useful in risk-stratifying patients presenting with chest pain in the USA and could impact clinical decision-making

Left ventricular ejection fraction and contrast induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: Results of retrospective chart review

Background: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is an important cause of increasing the hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. By increasing intra-renal vasoconstriction, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) can increase the risk of CI-AKI. We sought to investigate whether LVEF can impact the incidence of CI-AKI after cardiac catheterization and whether it can be used to predict CI-AKI. Methods: Patients underwent cardiac catheterization from December 2017 to February 2018 at Jersey Shore University Medical Center were enrolled in the study. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ≥ 0.5 mg/dL or an increase of ≥ 25% from the pre-procedure value within 72 hours post-procedure. The maximum allowable contrast dose was calculated using the following formula: (5* (weight (kg)/creatinine level (mg/dL)). A multivariable logistic regression analyses, controlling for potential confounders, were used to test associations between LVEF and CI-AKI. Results: 9.6% had post catheterization CI-AKI. A total of 18 out of 44 (44%) of patients who had CI-AKI also had ongoing congestive heart failure. No statistically significant association found neither with maximum allowable contrast (p = 0.009) nor ejection fraction (p = 0.099) with the development of CI-AKI. Conclusion: In spite of the fact that no statistically significant relationship found between the percentage maximum contrast dose and the ejection fraction with the post-procedure CI-AKI, we heighten the essential of employing Maximum Allowable Contrast Dose (MACD) and ejection fraction in patients undergoing PCI to be used as a clinical guide to predict CI-AKI

Effects of staged versus ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions on renal function-Is there a benefit to staging?

AIM: The purpose of this study is to determine whether ad hoc (same session) percutaneous coronary intervention, and staged (multiple session) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have different renal outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective cohort study that compares the maximal decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at various times points (3-6days, 1-4weeks, 4-12weeks) after either ad hoc or staged PCI. 115 patients undergoing staged PCI and 115 matched ad hoc PCI controls were included in the study. They were equivalent in baseline GFR, left ventricular ejection fraction and intra-procedural volume status based on LVEDP. The group undergoing staged PCI had greater cumulative fluoroscopy time, SYNTAX score and number of stents placed. Staged PCIs used less contrast per catheterization (155.0±5.6mL) but higher cumulative contrast dose (326.6±14.0mL) compared to ad hoc PCIs (193.4±7.2mL). Following intervention, there was a progressive decline in renal function that did not significantly differ between the ad hoc and staged groups. In the subgroup of patients with initial GFR ≤60cm CONCLUSIONS: Staged PCI exposes patients to greater cumulative contrast agent loads. The decline in renal function observed in both groups did not differ significantly, however worse renal outcomes were observed in the staged PCI group with baseline GFR ≤60c

QRS duration and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

BACKGROUND: Non-traditional EKG parameters such as QRS pattern and QRS duration (QRSd) are being investigated in acute coronary syndrome as prognostic markers. Following an infarction, the heart attempts to compensate for myocardial loss through remodeling which eventually lowers the ejection fraction (LVEF). Our objective is to evaluate the relationship between the QRSd at the time of NSTEMI and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) and changes in LVEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients admitted with NSTEMI between 08/01/2006 and 9/30/2012 were included. Patients were classified into high or low QRSd at cutoff value of 90ms noted on initial EKG after excluding bundle-branch block. A total of 536 patients with mean age of 66±14years were included. 49% were male and majority were African American (73%). Patients within the higher QRSd group had a lower LVEF at the time of the NSTEMI compared to those with QRSd(47±15% vs. 50±13%; p CONCLUSION: QRSd ≥90ms at the time of NSTEMI is predictive of three-vessel/left main coronary artery involvement and a lower LVEF. This depression in LVEF is maintained for up to 12months. Thus, the QRSd at time of NSTEMI has additional prognostic significance