4 research outputs found
Observational Constraints on Silent Quartessence
We derive new constraints set by SNIa experiments (`gold' data sample of
Riess et al.), X-ray galaxy cluster data (Allen et al. Chandra measurements of
the X-ray gas mass fraction in 26 clusters), large scale structure (Sloan
Digital Sky Survey spectrum) and cosmic microwave background (WMAP) on the
quartessence Chaplygin model. We consider both adiabatic perturbations and
intrinsic non-adiabatic perturbations such that the effective sound speed
vanishes (Silent Chaplygin). We show that for the adiabatic case, only models
with equation of state parameter are allowed: this
means that the allowed models are very close to \LambdaCDM. In the Silent case,
however, the results are consistent with observations in a much broader range,
-0.3<\alpha<0.7.Comment: 7 pages, 12 figures, to be submitted to JCA
Entropy perturbations in quartessence Chaplygin models
We show that entropy perturbations can eliminate instabilities and
oscillations, in the mass power spectrum of the quartessence Chaplygin models.
Our results enlarge the current parameter space of models compatible with large
scale structure and cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations.Comment: references added, one figure corrected, results unchange
Observational Constraints on Chaplygin Quartessence: Background Results
We derive the constraints set by several experiments on the quartessence
Chaplygin model (QCM). In this scenario, a single fluid component drives the
Universe from a nonrelativistic matter-dominated phase to an accelerated
expansion phase behaving, first, like dark matter and in a more recent epoch
like dark energy. We consider current data from SNIa experiments, statistics of
gravitational lensing, FR IIb radio galaxies, and x-ray gas mass fraction in
galaxy clusters. We investigate the constraints from this data set on flat
Chaplygin quartessence cosmologies. The observables considered here are
dependent essentially on the background geometry, and not on the specific form
of the QCM fluctuations. We obtain the confidence region on the two parameters
of the model from a combined analysis of all the above tests. We find that the
best-fit occurs close to the CDM limit (). The standard
Chaplygin quartessence () is also allowed by the data, but only at
the level.Comment: Replaced to match the published version, references update