Food neophobia across the life course: Pooling data from five national cross-sectional surveys in Ireland

Food neophobia describes a reluctance to eat novel foods. Levels of food neophobia vary throughout life and are thought to peak in childhood. However, the trajectory of food neophobia across the life course is not fully clear. Using data from five national cross-sectional surveys in Ireland we explored levels of food neophobia in males and females aged 1–87 years. In addition, we assessed the influence of sociodemographic factors, breastfeeding and parental food neophobia on food neophobia. Food neophobia was measured using the Food Neophobia Scale in adults and adolescents and with the Children\u27s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire in preschool and school aged children. A total of 3246 participants (female, 49.9%) were included. Food neophobia increased with age from 1 to ∼6 years, then decreased until early adulthood where it remained stable until increasing with age in older adults (\u3e54 years). In adults, lower education level, social class and rural residency were associated with higher food neophobia. When preschool and school aged children surveys were pooled (ages 1–12), higher food neophobia was seen in males, children with lower parental education and those who were not breastfed. Sociodemographic factors were not significantly associated with food neophobia in adolescents. Breastfeeding duration was negatively associated with food neophobia in children and adolescents and parental food neophobia was positively associated with child\u27s food neophobia in preschool and school aged children. The influence of socioeconomic factors was more pronounced in adults than in children or adolescents. However, sociodemographic factors only explained a small proportion of the variation in food neophobia across all ages. Longitudinal studies are needed to understand how changes in age or socioeconomic circumstance influence food neophobia at an individual level

LEAF (Learning from and Engaging with Assessment and Feedback) Final project report

The LEAF (Learning from and Engaging with Assessment and Feedback) project was funded under the Teaching Fellowship in TU Dublin, city campus for 18 months beginning in January 2018. The project team comprised 18 academics from across the TU Dublin - City Campus and there are representatives from all colleges. Also included were two further members who represented the student voice: the Director of Student Affairs and the Students’ Union Education Officer. This project sought to address a key issue in third level Teaching and Learning, that of assessment and assessment feedback. Assessment strategies have been shown to have a large impact on shaping how students learn and how they develop key employability skills. Learning from best practice nationally and internationally, and research from staff, students and quality documents, this project has developed a set of recommendations which will enhance practices in, and experiences of, assessments and feedback in TU Dublin

Using Rubrics in Assessment and Feedback

Dr Mairead Stack (TU Dublin) talks about the use of assessment rubrics to provide formative and summative feedback to students. A range of different rubrics, including examples negotiated with students, are described. These have been used to provide task specific criteria as well as to provide marks and feedback. She was a member of the TU Dublin Teaching Fellowship LEAF (Learning from and Engaging with Assessment and Feedback). Recording taken at the National Forum-funded seminar held on 9th May 2019 in TU Dublin, titled Building towards programme learning outcomes through effective assessment and feedback strategie

Food neophobia and its relationship with dietary variety and quality in Irish adults: Findings from a national cross-sectional study

peer-reviewedFood neophobia is characterised by a reluctance to eat novel or unfamiliar foods and has been linked to reduced dietary variety and quality. However, this link has been primarily studied in children. Therefore, we aimed to explore the relationship between food neophobia and dietary variety and quality in adults using a sub-sample of the National Adults Nutrition Survey collected between 2008 and 2010 (n = 1088). Food and nutrient intakes were assessed using a 4-day semi-weighed food diary. Food neophobia was measured using the Food Neophobia Scale (FNS). Dietary variety was assessed in three ways; Total Dietary Variety (TDV), Food-Group Variety (FGV) and Fruit and Vegetable Variety (FVV). Diet quality was assessed using the Mean Adequacy Ratio (MAR) and Nutrient-Rich Food Index (NRF9.3). A multivariate general linear model was used to assess the linear relationships between FNS score and all dietary measures, controlling for age, sex, education level, social class, location and BMI. Food neophobia was found to be inversely associated with TDV, FGV and FVV. In addition, food neophobia was negatively associated with vitamin C, magnesium and fruit and vegetable intakes and positively associated with percentage energy from free sugars. However, food neophobia was not significantly associated with all other nutrients, MAR and NRF9.3. While these results suggest food neophobia may not be a particularly important risk factor for poor nutrient status, adherence to certain dietary recommendations remains low within the Irish population and food neophobia may further inhibit the adaption of healthy and sustainable diets. Future research should seek to understand the implications of food neophobia on dietary behaviour change

Transitional care models in adolescent kidney transplant recipients - a systematic review

Background: Adolescence is a time of significant change for patients, guardians and clinicians. The paediatrician must ensure patients develop the necessary skills and knowledge required to transition and to function as an independent entity, with autonomy over their own care. The transfer from paediatric to adult care carries an increased risk of graft-related complications attributable to a multitude of reasons, particularly non-adherence to immunosuppressive medicines and poor attendance at scheduled appointments. This systematic review was conducted to ascertain the transitional care models available to clinicians caring for kidney transplant recipients and to compare the approach in each respective case. Methods: A systematic review was performed, in a methodology outlined by the PRISMA guidelines. OVID MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies that outlined valid, replicable models pertaining to transitional care of paediatric kidney transplant recipients between 1946 and Quarter 3 of 2021. The reference lists of selected articles were also perused for further eligible studies and experts in the field were consulted for further eligible articles. Two investigators assessed all studies for eligibility and independently performed data extraction. Any discrepancies were settled by consensus. Results: A total of 1121 abstracts were identified, which was reduced to 1029 upon removal of duplicates. A total of 51 articles were deemed appropriate for full-text review and critical appraisal. A total of 12 articles that described models for transition pertaining to kidney transplant patients were included in qualitative synthesis. Every paper utilized a different transition model. All but one model included a physician and nurse at minimum in the transition process. The involvement of adult nephrologists, medical social work, psychology and psychiatry was variable. The mean age for the initiation of transition was 13.4 years (range: 10-17.5 years). The mean age at transfer to adult services was 18.3 years (range: 16-20.5 years). Conclusions: Despite the well-established need for good transitional care for paediatric solid-organ transplant recipients, models tailored specifically for kidney transplant recipients are lacking. Further research and validation studies are required to ascertain the best method of providing effective transitional care to these patients. Transitional care should become a standardized process for adolescents and young adults with kidney transplants.</p