4 research outputs found

    Factors affecting the migrating waterfowls at the Annaiwilndawa Ramsar site of the northwestern Sri Lanka

    Get PDF
    Factors affecting the migrating waterfowls at three reservoirs of the Annaiwilundawa Ramsar site of Northwestern Sri Lanka were studied from October 2009 to March 2012. Populations of the waterfowls were recorded in each month using line transacts method. The day was divided in to three time periods as morning (7:00 hrs - 10:00 hrs), afternoon (12:00 hrs – 14.00 hrs) and evening (15:00 hrs - 17:00 hrs) and the diurnal activities were recorded using “Focal animal sampling method” and the “Scan sampling method”. Any event causing the waterfowls to alter their behavior was recorded as a disturbance. Waterfowl were observed through a 15~60 x 25 spotting scope and 25 x 45 binocular. Garganey (Anas querquedula) was the only migratory waterfowl recorded. The number of Garganey gradually declined in number over the three year period with maximum in December 2009 (335 individuals and density 3350 birds / Km2). From November 2009 to February 2010 (winter season) average population of Garganey was 3188 Birds/ Km2, from November 2010 to February 2011 it was 1358 Birds/ Km2 and from November 2011 to February 2012 it was 760 Birds/ Km2. Gargeney abandoned the Annaiwilundawa Ramsar site when the reservoirs dried up in January and February 2012. Garganey (n = 3098) allocated most of their time for resting (morning 41%, mid day 55% and evening 35%). This was followed by preening (morning 33%, mid day 37% and evening 22%). ANOVA results revealed no significant differences in the diurnal activity budgets of Garganey during the three time periods of the study. (Sleeping F(2,28) )= 0.186, p = 0.831 Resting F(2,28) = 1.480, p= 0.254, Feeding, F(2,28)= 2.783, p = 0.079, Flying F(2,28)= 0.111, p= 0.896, Swimming F(2,28)= 3.172, p= 0.057, walking F(2,28) = 2.059, p= 0.146, Preening F(2,28) = 0.124, p= 0.884, Agnostic F(2,28)= 0.458, p= 0.637,Alert F(2,28) = 0.363, p= 0.699, Bathing F(2,28)= 1.307, p= 0.287). Grass habitat (86%) was heavily used by Garganey for their diurnal activities followed by open water (9%). Habitat utilization of Garganey did not differ significantly during the study period (Invasive plant water hyacinth F(2,21) = 1.566, p = 0.232, Salvinia F(2,21) = 0.681, p = 0.517 Olu F(2,21) =0.385, p = 0.685, Open water F(2,21) = 1.390, p = 0.271, Grass F(2,21) = 0.894, p = 0.424, muddy Ground F(2,21) = 0.901, p = 0.421). Garganey was heavily disturbed by Brahminy kite

    Dramatic Dietary Shift Maintains Sequestered Toxins in Chemically Defended Snakes

    Get PDF
    Unlike other snakes, most species of Rhabdophis possess glands in their dorsal skin, sometimes limited to the neck, known as nucho-dorsal and nuchal glands, respectively. Those glands contain powerful cardiotonic steroids known as bufadienolides, which can be deployed as a defense against predators. Bufadienolides otherwise occur only in toads (Bufonidae) and some fireflies (Lampyrinae), which are known or believed to synthesize the toxins. The ancestral diet of Rhabdophis consists of anuran amphibians, and we have shown previously that the bufadienolide toxins of frog-eating species are sequestered from toads consumed as prey. However, one derived clade, the Rhabdophis nuchalis Group, has shifted its primary diet from frogs to earthworms. Here we confirm that the worm-eating snakes possess bufadienolides in their nucho-dorsal glands, although the worms themselves lack such toxins. In addition, we show that the bufadienolides of R. nuchalis Group species are obtained primarily from fireflies. Although few snakes feed on insects, we document through feeding experiments, chemosensory preference tests, and gut contents that lampyrine firefly larvae are regularly consumed by these snakes. Furthermore, members of the R. nuchalis Group contain compounds that resemble the distinctive bufadienolides of fireflies, but not those of toads, in stereochemistry, glycosylation, acetylation, and molecular weight. Thus, the evolutionary shift in primary prey among members of the R. nuchalis Group has been accompanied by a dramatic shift in the source of the species’ sequestered defensive toxins
    corecore