Brain natriuretic peptide: a biomarker for all cardiac disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate new development in the utility of brain natriuretic peptide and N-Terminal brain natriuretic peptide (BNP/NT-Pro-BNP) in the management of various cardiovascular diseases. The determination of plasma BNP levels has an established role in the discrimination of pulmonary oedema from other causes of acute dyspnoea, and there is increasing evidence of the utility of BNP/NT-Pro-BNP assay both as a prognostic tool in chronic heart failure and as a means of guiding therapy in heart failure patients aged below 70 years. RECENT FINDINGS: Findings have substantially extended the clinical utility of BNP/NT-Pro-BNP assay. In heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, BNP elevation may also facilitate diagnosis, although its precise utility is uncertain.In the acute catecholamine-induced myocardial inflammatory condition of Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC), BNP/NT-Pro-BNP elevations are marked and persist for at least 3 months, despite the absence of pulmonary oedema. In TTC, BNP/NT-Pro-BNP therefore serves as an ancillary diagnostic measure as well as a marker of recovery. Among other conditions in which BNP assay may provide prognostic information are atrial fibrillation (in which the extent of elevation predicts thromboembolic risk) and pulmonary hypertension. SUMMARY: BNP/NT-Pro-BNP assay has widespread utility as an adjunct to cardiovascular disease diagnosis and management.Gnanadevan Mahadavan, Thanh H. Nguyen, John D. Horowit

Hypertensive disorders in women with peripartum cardiomyopathy: insights from the ESC EORP PPCM Registry

Aims: Hypertensive disorders occur in women with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). How often hypertensive disorders co-exist, and to what extent they impact outcomes, is less clear. We describe differences in phenotype and outcomes in women with PPCM with and without hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. Methods: The European Society of Cardiology PPCM Registry enrolled women with PPCM from 2012-2018. Three groups were examined: 1) women without hypertension (‘PPCM-noHTN’); 2) women with hypertension but without pre-eclampsia (‘PPCM-HTN’); 3) women with pre-eclampsia (‘PPCM-PE’). Maternal (6-month) and neonatal outcomes were compared. Results: Of 735 women included, 452 (61.5%) had PPCM-noHTN, 99 (13.5%) had PPCM-HTN and 184 (25.0%) had PPCM-PE. Compared to women with PPCM-noHTN, women with PPCM-PE had more severe symptoms (NYHA IV in 44.4% and 29.9%, p<0.001), more frequent signs of heart failure (pulmonary rales in 70.7% and 55.4%, p=0.002), higher baseline LVEF (32.7% and 30.7%, p=0.005) and smaller left ventricular end diastolic diameter (57.4mm [±6.7] and 59.8mm [±8.1], p<0.001). There were no differences in the frequencies of death from any cause, re-hospitalization for any cause, stroke, or thromboembolic events. Compared to women with PPCM-noHTN, women with PPCM-PE had a greater likelihood of left ventricular recovery (LVEF≥50%) (adjusted OR 2.08 95% CI 1.21-3.57) and an adverse neonatal outcome (composite of termination, miscarriage, low birth weight or neonatal death) (adjusted OR 2.84 95% CI 1.66-4.87). Conclusion: Differences exist in phenotype, recovery of cardiac function and neonatal outcomes according to hypertensive status in women with PPCM