5 research outputs found

    May metallic biomaterials used for orthopaedic implants promote carcinogenesis? Preliminary transcriptomic research on human chondrocytes

    No full text
    The aim of this research was to assess the risk of carcinogenesis induced by the metallic materials intended for orthopaedic implants. The report is an analytical summary of changes in the expression of cancer-related genes in human chondrocytes of normal and neoplastic phenotype. Cq values (quantification cycle values) obtained from qRT-PCR reactions (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reactions) were used to count Fc values (fold change values) for each gene. Differences in Fc values obtained for primary and cancer cells grown on the surface of medical steel AISI316L and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy Ti6Al4V were then analyzed by t-Student test. The results indicate that for cancer cells grown on the surfaces of both examined materials the fold change greater than 2, usually considered essential, was found for LUM gene involved in sarcoma induction. For FOS gene, also involved in sarcoma induction, the Fc value was also very close to 2 in the primary cells exposed to Ti6Al4V alloy. The remaining observed changes were rather subtle, although they cannot be omitted from further studies because differences in gene expression in primary and tumor cells grown on the same biomaterial were statistically significant in several cases. The compilation of qRT-PCR experiments carried out on primary and cancer cells in parallel allowed to identify possible future contraindications for patients with a genetic predisposition to cancer or with cancer history

    Does surface structuring of metallic materials affect thrombocompatibility?

    No full text

    Adhesion and Activation of Blood Platelets on Laser-Structured Surfaces of Biomedical Metal Alloys

    No full text
    The laser surface modification of metallic implants presents a promising alternative to other surface modification techniques. A total of four alloyed metallic biomaterials were used for this study: medical steel (AISI 316L), cobalt–chromium–molybdenum alloy (CoCrMo) and titanium alloys (Ti6Al4V and Ti6Al7Nb). Samples of metallic biomaterials after machining were subjected to polishing or laser modification in two different versions. The results of surface modification were documented using SEM imaging and roughness measurement. After modification, the samples were sterilized with dry hot air, then exposed to citrate blood, washed with PBS buffer, fixed with glutaraldehyde, sputtered with a layer of gold and imaged using SEM to enable the quantification of adhered, activated and aggregated platelets on the surface of biomaterial samples. The average total number, counted in the field of view, of adhered platelets on the surfaces of the four tested biomaterials, regardless of the type of modification, did not differ statistically significantly (66 ± 81, 67 ± 75, 61 ± 70 and 57 ± 61 for AISI 316L, CoCrMo, Ti6Al4V and Ti6Al7Nb, respectively) and the average number of platelet aggregates was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.01) on the surfaces of AISI 316L medical steel (42 ± 53) and of the CoCrMo alloy (42 ± 52) compared to the surfaces of the titanium alloys Ti6Al4V (33 ± 39) and Ti6Al7Nb (32 ± 37). Remaining blood after contact was used to assess spontaneous platelet activation and aggregation in whole blood by flow cytometry. An in-depth analysis conducted on the obtained results as a function of the type of modification indicates small but statistically significant differences in the interaction of platelets with the tested surfaces of metallic biomaterials

    Comprehensive Biological Evaluation of Biomaterials Used in Spinal and Orthopedic Surgery

    No full text
    Biological acceptance is one of the most important aspects of a biomaterial and forms the basis for its clinical use. The aim of this study was a comprehensive biological evaluation (cytotoxicity test, bacterial colonization test, blood platelets adhesion test and transcriptome and proteome analysis of Saos-2 cells after contact with surface of the biomaterial) of biomaterials used in spinal and orthopedic surgery, namely, Ti6Al4V ELI (Extra Low Interstitials), its modified version obtained as a result of melting by electron beam technology (Ti6Al4V ELI-EBT), polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and polished medical steel American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) 316L (the reference material). Biological tests were carried out using the osteoblasts-like cells (Saos-2, ATCC HTB-85) and bacteria Escherichia coli (DH5α). Results showed lack of cytotoxicity of all materials and the surfaces of both Ti6Al4V ELI and PEEK exhibit a significantly higher resistance to colonization with E. coli cells, while the more porous surface of the same titanium alloy produced by electron beam technology (EBT) is more susceptible to microbial colonization than the control surface of polished medical steel. None of the tested materials showed high toxicity in relation to E. coli cells. Susceptibility to platelet adhesion was very high for polished medical steel AISI 316L, whilst much lower for the other biomaterials and can be ranked from the lowest to the highest as follows: PEEK &lt; Ti6Al4V ELI &lt; Ti6Al4V ELI-EBT. The number of expressed genes in Saos-2 cells exposed to contact with the examined biomaterials reached 9463 genes in total (ranging from 8455 genes expressed in cells exposed to ELI to 9160 genes in cells exposed to PEEK). Whereas the number of differentially expressed proteins detected on two-dimensional electrophoresis gels in Saos-2 cells after contact with the examined biomaterials was 141 for PEEK, 223 for Ti6Al4V ELI and 133 for Ti6Al4V ELI-EBT. Finally, 14 proteins with altered expression were identified by mass spectrometry. In conclusion, none of the tested biomaterials showed unsatisfactory levels of cytotoxicity. The gene and protein expression analysis, that represents a completely new approach towards characterization of these biomaterials, showed that the polymer PEEK causes much more intense changes in gene and protein expression and thus influences cell metabolism
    corecore