A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat

Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).Despite notable scientific and medical advances, broader political, socioeconomic and behavioural factors continue to undercut the response to the COVID-19 pandemic1,2. Here we convened, as part of this Delphi study, a diverse, multidisciplinary panel of 386 academic, health, non-governmental organization, government and other experts in COVID-19 response from 112 countries and territories to recommend specific actions to end this persistent global threat to public health. The panel developed a set of 41 consensus statements and 57 recommendations to governments, health systems, industry and other key stakeholders across six domains: communication; health systems; vaccination; prevention; treatment and care; and inequities. In the wake of nearly three years of fragmented global and national responses, it is instructive to note that three of the highest-ranked recommendations call for the adoption of whole-of-society and whole-of-government approaches1, while maintaining proven prevention measures using a vaccines-plus approach2 that employs a range of public health and financial support measures to complement vaccination. Other recommendations with at least 99% combined agreement advise governments and other stakeholders to improve communication, rebuild public trust and engage communities3 in the management of pandemic responses. The findings of the study, which have been further endorsed by 184 organizations globally, include points of unanimous agreement, as well as six recommendations with >5% disagreement, that provide health and social policy actions to address inadequacies in the pandemic response and help to bring this public health threat to an end.Peer reviewe

Dominican Republic: The response to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020

The paper presents the situation in the Dominican Republic in terms of pandemic preparedness, the policies implemented to respond to it, the achievements made, and the challenges for the future. The COVID-19 pandemic found the Dominican Republic unprepared to deal with it, with significant deficiencies in the areas of prevention, early detection and notification, rapid response and mitigation, compliance with international standards, risk environment and health system strength.En el documento se presenta la situación de la República Dominicana en lo que respecta a la preparación para la pandemia, las políticas aplicadas para responder a ella, los logros alcanzados y los retos para el futuro. La pandemia del COVID-19 encontró a la República Dominicana sin preparación para enfrentarla, con importantes deficiencias en las áreas de prevención, detección temprana y notificación, respuesta rápida y mitigación, cumplimiento de las normas internacionales, entorno de riesgo, y en la fortaleza del sistema de salud

República Dominicana: La respuesta a la pandemia de COVID-19 en 2021

Este artículo presenta el caso de la República Dominicana en relación con su grado de preparación para enfrentar emergencias, marco de vulnerabilidad ambiental y social, su respuesta a la pandemia de COVID-19, incluyendo las políticas implementadas para manejarla, y sus perspectivas para el futuro. La República Dominicana, siendo altamente vulnerable al cambio climático y riesgos ambientales, necesita estar preparada para emergencias nacionales, entre las que se incluye la presente pandemia. Al producirse, el país contaba con un sistema de salud y financiamiento público débil y, en este contexto, experimentó importante cantidad de casos confirmados

Sistema de salud de República Dominicana The health system of Dominican Republic

En este trabajo se describen las condiciones de salud de la República Dominicana y, con mayor detalle, el sistema de salud dominicano, incluyendo su estructura y cobertura, sus fuentes de financiamiento, el gasto en salud, los recursos físicos, materiales y humanos de los que dispone, las tareas de rectoría que desarrolla el Ministerio de Salud Pública y la generación de información. También se discuten la participación de los usuarios en la operación y evaluación del sistema de salud y las más recientes innovaciones implementadas, dentro de las que destacan la nueva Ley General de Salud, la nueva Ley de Seguridad Social y el Plan Decenal de Salud.<br>This paper describes the health conditions in Dominican Republic and the characteristics of the Dominican health system, including its structure and coverage, its financial sources, the health expenditure, the physical, material and human resources available, the stewardship functions developed by the Ministry of Public Health and the generation of health information. The participation of health care users in the operation and evaluation of the system and the most recent policy innovations, including the new General Health Law, the new Social Security Law and the Decennial Health Plan are also discussed

Cuentas de salud del pasado al presente para una aritmética política

Este informe describe el proceso de ampliación progresiva de las cuentas de salud para medir los gastos nacionales en salud, desde los primeros intentos de la Asociación Médica Estadounidense en 1926 hasta la actualidad. Se mencionan los hitos en la creación del Sistema de Cuentas de Salud , desde los antecedentes económicos y las acciones iniciales de unos cuantos países y organizaciones a la necesidad de un conjunto de normas de contabilidad para los sistemas de atención de salud y, por último, la consolidación con el Sistema de Cuentas de Salud del 2011. Varias organizaciones internacionales, como la Organización Mundial de la Salud, la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos, Eurostat, el Banco Mundial y la Agencia de los Estados Unidos para el Desarrollo Internacional, han sido fundamentales para ampliar los ejercicios nacionales de cuentas de salud y asegurar que estén normalizados, sean comparables y se institucionalicen. Las acciones nacionales para realizar un seguimiento de los gastos en salud no solo han enriquecido los resultados colectivos, sino que se han convertido en un componente importante del liderazgo mundial, al fundamentar las políticas en todo el mundo. Más de 100 países han creado cuentas de salud de conformidad con la norma mundial, y han logrado una mejor comprensión del gasto en salud y de los flujos financieros. Estos resultados son clave para vigilar los avances relativos a las iniciativas nacionales y mundiales, como los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible y la cobertura universal de salud. Todavía quedan retos por delante, como la institucionalización y la calidad de los resultados. También se necesita responsabilidad social para mejorar las fuentes de datos, y aumentar la producción y eluso de las cuentas de salud

Health accounts from past to present for a political arithmetic

This report traces the progressive expansion of health accounts (HA) to measure national health expenditures, from the first attempts in 1926 by the American Medical Association to the present day. Milestones in the development of A System of Health Accounts (SHA) are covered, from the economic background to initial efforts by a few countries and organizations, to the need for a set of accounting standards for health care systems, and finally, to consolidation with SHA 2011. International organizations, such as the World Health Organization, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Eurostat, the World Bank, and the United States Agency for International Development have been critical to expanding national HA exercises and ensuring that these are standardized, comparable, and become institutionalized. National efforts to track health expenditures have not only enriched collective results, but have become an important component of global leadership, informing policy the world over. More than 100 countries have created HA under the global standard and have gained a better understanding of health spending and financial flows. These results are key for monitoring progress toward national and global initiatives, such as the Sustainable Development Goals and Universal Health Coverage. Challenges remain to be tackled, among them institutionalization and quality of results. Social responsibility for improving data sources and expanding the generation and usability of health accounts are also needed

Household catastrophic health expenditures: a comparative analysis of twelve Latin American and Caribbean Countries Gastos catastróficos en salud de los hogares: un análisis comparativo de doce países en América Latina y el Caribe

OBJECTIVE: Compare patterns of catastrophic health expenditures in 12 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prevalence of catastrophic expenses was estimated uniformly at the household level using household surveys. Two types of prevalence indicators were used based on out-of-pocket health expense: a) relative to an international poverty line, and b) relative to the household's ability to pay net of their food basket. Ratios of catastrophic expenditures were estimated across subgroups defined by economic and social variables. RESULTS: The percent of households with catastrophic health expenditures ranged from 1 to 25% in the twelve countries. In general, rural residence, lowest quintile of income, presence of older adults, and lack of health insurance in the household are associated with higher propensity of catastrophic health expenditures. However, there is vast heterogeneity by country. CONCLUSIONS: Cross national studies may serve to examine how health systems contribute to the social protection of Latin American households.<br>OBJETIVO: Comparar los patrones de gastos catastróficos en salud en 12 países de América Latina y el Caribe. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se estimó la prevalencia de gastos catastróficos de manera uniforme para doce países usando encuestas de hogares. Se emplearon dos tipos de indicadores para medir la prevalencia basados en el gasto de bolsillo en salud: a) en relación con una línea de pobreza internacional; y b) en relación con la capacidad de pago del hogar en términos de su propia canasta alimentaria. Se estimaron razones para comparar el nivel de gastos catastróficos entre subgrupos poblacionales definidos por variables económicas y sociales. RESULTADOS: El porcentaje de hogares con gastos catastróficos variaron de 1 a 25% en los 12 países. En general, la residencia rural, el bajo nivel de ingresos, la presencia de adultos mayores, y la carencia de aseguramiento en salud de los hogares se asocian con mayor propensión a sufrir gastos catastróficos en salud. Sin embargo, existe una marcada heterogeneidad por país. CONCLUSIONES: Los estudios comparativos entre países pueden servir para examinar cómo los sistemas de salud contribuyen a la protección social de los hogares en América Latina

A multinational Delphi consensus to end the COVID-19 public health threat

Despite notable scientific and medical advances, broader political, socioeconomic and behavioural factors continue to undercut the response to the COVID-19 pandemic1,2. Here we convened, as part of this Delphi study, a diverse, multidisciplinary panel of 386 academic, health, non-governmental organization, government and other experts in COVID-19 response from 112 countries and territories to recommend specific actions to end this persistent global threat to public health. The panel developed a set of 41 consensus statements and 57 recommendations to governments, health systems, industry and other key stakeholders across six domains: communication; health systems; vaccination; prevention; treatment and care; and inequities. In the wake of nearly three years of fragmented global and national responses, it is instructive to note that three of the highest-ranked recommendations call for the adoption of whole-of-society and whole-of-government approaches1, while maintaining proven prevention measures using a vaccines-plus approach2 that employs a range of public health and financial support measures to complement vaccination. Other recommendations with at least 99% combined agreement advise governments and other stakeholders to improve communication, rebuild public trust and engage communities3 in the management of pandemic responses. The findings of the study, which have been further endorsed by 184 organizations globally, include points of unanimous agreement, as well as six recommendations with &gt;5% disagreement, that provide health and social policy actions to address inadequacies in the pandemic response and help to bring this public health threat to an end