Dysfunctional High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Coronary Artery Disease: A Narrative Review

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is traditionally viewed as protective against cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, emerging evidence reveals that dysfunctional HDL, characterized by impaired reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), reduced anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities and increased endothelial dysfunction, which can contribute to coronary artery disease (CAD). Dysfunctional HDL, resulting from oxidative modifications of Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) and enzyme inactivation, fails to effectively remove cholesterol from peripheral tissues and may promote inflammation and atherosclerosis. Genetic mutations affecting HDL metabolism further complicate its role in cardiovascular health. Studies have shown that conventional therapies aimed at raising HDL-C levels do not necessarily reduce cardiovascular events, highlighting the need for new approaches that improve HDL functionality. Therapeutic strategies such as Apo A-1 mimetic peptides, reconstituted HDL infusions, and drugs targeting specific HDL metabolic pathways are being explored. Additionally, weight loss, statin therapy, and niacin have shown potential in enhancing HDL function. The pathophysiology of dysfunctional HDL involves complex mechanisms, including oxidative stress, inflammation, and genetic mutations, which alter its structure and function, diminishing its cardioprotective effects. New functional assays, such as the cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) and HDL inflammatory index, provide more accurate predictions of cardiovascular risk by assessing HDL quality rather than quantity. As research progresses, the focus is shifting towards therapeutic strategies that enhance HDL function and address the root causes of its dysfunction, offering a more effective approach to reducing cardiovascular risk and preventing CAD

Management of cancer patients at high and very-high risk of cardiotoxicity: Main questions and answers

In recent years, important advances have been made in the field of Cardio-Oncology. The 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology proposed a baseline cardiovascular risk stratification for cancer patients and preventive strategies in patients at high and very-high risk of cardiotoxicity. Cardiovascular toxic effects of anti-cancer drugs are being extensively studied; surveillance programs have been proposed, based on the baseline cardiovascular risk. On the other hand, there is little data on Cardio-Oncological management of patients at high and very-high cardiovascular risk with previous cardiovascular diseases. For example, little is known about management of cancer patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), patients with a recent myocardial infarction or other cardiovascular diseases; when to resume anti-cancer drugs after a cardiovascular toxic event. Collaboration between Cardiologists and Oncologists and multidisciplinary team evaluations are certainly essential to decide the best therapeutic strategy for cancer patients, to treat cancer while saving the heart. Therefore, in the present review, we attempt to provide a useful guide to clinicians in treating patients with high and very-high risk of cardiotoxicity by enucleating main questions and answering them based on the evidence available as well as expert opinion and our clinical experience

Arterial Stiffness: Effects of Anticancer Drugs Used for Breast Cancer Women

Purpose: It is well known that anticancer drugs used for treating breast cancer can cause cardiac toxicity, and less is known about vascular toxicity. The aim of this study was to assess subclinical vascular effects of anthracyclines and trastuzumab (TRZ) in women treated for breast cancer. Methods: We enrolled 133 female patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant treatment with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (CT) followed by taxane (paclitaxel/docetaxel) + TRZ. Patients underwent a standard echocardiography including measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain at baseline and at follow-up. Vascular toxicity was evaluated by measuring brachial blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness indices (pulse wave velocity and Beta stiffness index) at T0 (baseline), T1 (3 months), T2 (6 months), and T3 (12 months). Results: Arterial stiffness indices were significantly increased at T1 in patients treated with anthracycline-containing CT (PWV 5.5 m/s IQR 5.15–6.4 at T0 vs. PWV 6.7 m/s IQR 5.6–7.2 at T1, p < 0.05; Beta index PWV 6.7 IQR 5.25–6.65 at T0, PWV 8.35 IQR 6.5–10.15 at T1, p < 0.05) but not at T2 and T3, when treatment with anthracyclines was stopped and patients were under treatment with taxane and TRZ. Blood pressure values did not significantly change during follow-up. Conclusion: Changes in arterial stiffness parameters occur early after starting treatment with anthracyclines, and they seem to be reversible if anthracycline treatment is stopped. These changes are not influenced by blood pressure values modifications. Therefore, in breast cancer women, anthracyclines seem to cause early reversible subclinical vascular injury

Left Ventricular Deformation and Myocardial Work Parameters in Patients with Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis Treated with Patisiran: A Single-Center Study

Background: In recent years, many advances have been made in the treatment of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv). Patisiran is a small-interfering RNA used to treat ATTRv with only polyneuropathy or polyneuropathy and cardiomyopathy. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of patisiran on cardiac function in ATTRv patients using speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) analysis. Methods: A single-center prospective study was performed enrolling 21 patients with ATTRv (11 M—52% of the population; 10 F—48% of the population; median age 66 ± 8.4 years old). A total of 7 patients had cardiac amyloidosis and polyneuropathy, and 14 patients had only polyneuropathy without cardiac involvement. Cardiological evaluation including electrocardiograms, echocardiography with STE, and assessment of myocardial work parameters was performed in all patients before starting patisiran and after 9–18 months. Functional capacity was assessed using the 6 min walk test; quality of life was assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Results: We did not find a significant difference in gender prevalence of ATTR amyloidosis in all of the population (p-value 0.79), but we found that cardiac amyloidosis significantly predominated in the male sex compared to patients with only neuropathy. In all patients, we found a slight improvement in functional capacity and quality of life. We did not find significant changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but we found a significant improvement in left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), global work waste (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE), especially in patients with cardiac amyloidosis; E/e’ average and left atrial stiffness also improved significantly in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. Conclusions: Our study confirms a positive effect of patisiran on cardiac function, particularly the absence of signs of subclinical deterioration as detected by very sensitive STE parameters such as GLS, MW, and atrial stiffness during follow up in patients treated with patisiran

Anti-EGFR Therapy in Metastatic Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Myth or Reality?

Background: Due to the relative rarity of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), prospective trials, helping to guide therapeutic decisions, are lacking and the optimal therapy for advanced SBA is unknown. The role of targeted agents, such as anti\u2013epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anti\u2013vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is unknown. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter observational study that included patients with metastatic SBA treated with anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab) \ub1 chemotherapy in the first (I) or second (II) line. Results: Thirteen patients with metastatic SBA, recruited from 5 Italian referral institutions, were included in the present retrospective analysis. All patients received anti-EGFR inhibitors as a single agent or in association with chemotherapy. More common G2 treatment\u2013related side effects were skin reaction (8 patients, 53.8%), hypomagnesemia (6 patients, 46.2%), and diarrhea (8 patients, 61.5%). Grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only 1 patient. Conjunctivitis was not reported in any patients. Grade 4 toxicity was not reported. In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 5.526 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.684-12.467). Median overall survival was 15.86 months (95% CI: 14.43-24.30). Complete response was observed in 15% of patients, partial response in 39% of patients, stable disease in 23% of patients, and progression disease in 15% of patients. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, anti-EGFR inhibitors showed to be a suitable addendum to chemotherapy in the I and II line, with an excellent tolerance and safety profile both in I and II line

Denosumab for cancer-related bone loss

Introduction Prolonged use of anti-cancer treatments in breast and prostate tumors alters physiological bone turnover leading to adverse skeletal related events, such as osteoporosis, loss of bone mass, and increased risk of fractures. These complications known as cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) should be managed with bone targeting agents such as the bisphosphonates and denosumab. The latter is a monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL) that suppresses osteoclasts function and survival increasing bone mass. Areas covered This review will focus on the mechanisms associated with bone loss induced by cancer treatments and the most recent evidence about the use of denosumab as preventive and therapeutic strategy to protect bone health. Moreover, we will discuss several key aspects regarding the clinical practical use of denosumab to optimize the management of CTLIB in breast and prostate cancer. Expert opinion Denosumab treatment strongly prevents cancer therapies-related skeletal issues in breast and prostate cancer with a good safety profile. Adjuvant six-monthly denosumab delays the time to first fracture onset in early stage breast cancer patients with normal or altered bone mineral density (BMD). Similarly, denosumab treatment is able to prevent fractures and BMD loss in nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients

Artificial intelligence in cardiology: a peek at the future and the role of ChatGPT in cardiology practice

: Artificial intelligence has increasingly become an integral part of our daily activities. ChatGPT, a natural language processing technology developed by OpenAI, is widely used in various industries, including healthcare. The application of ChatGPT in healthcare is still evolving, with studies exploring its potential in clinical decision-making, patient education, workflow optimization, and scientific literature. ChatGPT could be exploited in the medical field to improve patient education and information, thus increasing compliance. ChatGPT could facilitate information exchange on major cardiovascular diseases, provide clinical decision support, and improve patient communication and education. It could assist the clinician in differential diagnosis, suggest appropriate imaging modalities, and optimize treatment plans based on evidence-based guidelines. However, it is unclear whether it will be possible to use ChatGPT for the management of patients who require rapid decisions. Indeed, many drawbacks are associated with the daily use of these technologies in the medical field, such as insufficient expertise in specialized fields and a lack of comprehension of the context in which it works. The pros and cons of its use have been explored in this review, which was not written with the help of ChatGPT