2 research outputs found
Developing music improvisation workshops for preschool children through Action Research
Improvisation in music is an important skill, which is increasingly valued, and an
essential part of curricula at all educational levels. However, understandings of
improvisation are conflicting and contradictory approaches exist within
improvisation pedagogy. Creative and learning processes from free improvisation are
used in Higher Education, and with Secondary and Primary children, but there is
scarce research with young children. This is despite potential alignment with
preschool curricula, which emphasise creativity and social skills.
The aims of this PhD were to investigate and improve a novel method of delivering
music education to preschool children through improvisation, emphasising personal
creativity and socio-musical responsiveness. The research questions were as follows:
How can childrenâs creativity and engagement in group improvisation be appreciated
and evaluated? This question had two further sub questions: What are parentsâ and
teachersâ attitudes and beliefs about the children, creativity and music?, and, What
are the childrenâs conceptualisations of the workshops? The second research
question was: Do the workshop programme, teaching approaches and methods
change through two cycles of Action Research?
A Pragmatic theoretical stance supported Mixed Methods within an Action Research
design, providing a suitable model for enquiry through action, analysis, and planned
change. Workshop materials were designed for two 6-week cycles of Action
Research for different groups of preschool children (seven in cycle I, six in Cycle II;
aged 4-5) in 2016. Prior to the workshops, two original theoretical constructs were
proposed and then refined through the process of analysis: Creative musical agency
(CMA) and socio-musical aptitude (S-MA). CMA is instantiated when a child
creates and executes novel musical material independently in a group improvisation.
S-MA is instantiated when child creates a musical response in relation and with
reference to, another childâs musical idea in a group improvisation. Video data of the
childrenâs improvisations were sampled and analysed using multimodal video
analysis, to gain a rich, nuanced picture of social and musical interactions and
expressions of creativity during the childrenâs improvisations. This involved coding
for instances of CMA and S-MA in different musical parameters. In-depth interviews
with the childrenâs parents and teachers and childrenâs talk from the workshops were
subjected to Thematic Analysis. Two experts rated 39 clips of the childrenâs
improvisations as showing CMA, S-MA or neither and were interviewed to explore
their views further.
In parentsâ and teachersâ interviews, the types of strategies they employed were
shaped by whether or not they perceived a child as confident and able to share. Their
conceptions of childrenâs creativity were through descriptions of their art activities as
well as making up stories and role play. In contrast, music was not readily
conceptualised as a creative activity and being musical was understood as possessing
technical skill on an instrument. All of the adults identified as non-musical, even
though they participated in musical activities with the children. In childrenâs talk,
their understandings of improvising were mediated in distinct ways: previous
musical experiences, expressive descriptions of their improvisations, and
combinations of these with musical terms. Video analysis indicated that for 10/13
children, the number of CMA and S-MA events increased over the workshop
programme. The range of musical parameters for improvising increased through the
workshop programme. Between the expertsâ video clip ratings there was a slight
agreement for CMA (Kappa 0.21 and moderate agreement for S-MA (Kappa 0.5).
They accounted for this by proposing that the teacher mediated some childrenâs
CMA events. Video analysis showed children looking at the teacher before 57% of
CMA events. The workshop model changed from a linear
succession of tasks with a talk section at the end to iterative cycle of playing and
talking, as the original model was not effective in facilitating the childrenâs
discourse.
This study is the first to use improvisation with a group of this size and age. Two
novel constructs of CMA and S-MA offer a promising means to apprehend and
evaluate young childrenâs creativity and engagements in group improvisation.
Childrenâs perspectives in creative tasks are under reported; the distinct
understandings of improvisation that emerged here are important in appreciating
conceptual as well as musical development at this age. Parents and teachers value
music and creativity but their own musical identities may affect how they create
music with children. The refined workshop model offers a flexible and responsive
template; by capturing childrenâs understanding of their playing, informed
pedagogical choices can be made.
Recommendations for future research include creating more CMA and S-MA based
activities, and investigating effective teacher training for future delivery. More
qualitative studies could investigate childrenâs cognitive processes in group
creativity. Music is a collection of skills, therefore, developing conceptualisations of
music education as improving creativity, social skills and critical thinking, presents a
powerful argument for teaching and appreciating music in these ways from the start
of young childrenâs education