15 research outputs found

    A non-traditional method of teaching general practice to medical students: notes summarising

    No full text

    Introducing an old teaching tool to general practice

    No full text

    In patients with carcinoid syndrome undergoing valve replacement: Will a biological valve have acceptable durability?

    No full text
    A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was ‘In patients with carcinoid syndrome undergoing valve replacement, will a biological valve have acceptable durability?’ Altogether, more than 130 papers were found using the reported search, of which 17 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The pooled data from all papers represent 51 patients with carcinoid right heart disease who underwent tricuspid valve replacement. Two ‘outcomes’ studies reported a 30-day postoperative mortality of 16.7–18% and 2-year survival rates of 44 and 50%, respectively. Seventeen patients were detailed in case reports. Of these 17 patients, 7 died during the follow-up period. All but one of these patients had a normal bioprosthesis at echocardiography or at post-mortem. One patient with a plaque-covered valve had a functionally normal valve. We conclude that at present, the best available evidence suggests that although 30-day mortality approaches 20%, approximately half of patients with carcinoid syndrome undergoing tricuspid valve replacement can be expected to survive 2 years. Some patients survive considerably longer than this, beyond 10 years in some cases. Importantly, at autopsy, many replacement valves have been shown to be normal, with a few patients reported as having died of cardiac causes. This should be taken as cautious evidence that biological valves have an acceptable lifespan in patients with carcinoid syndrome and that the process of valve destruction seen in carcinoid patients does not continue to a significant level in the bioprosthesis. Caveats to this include the lack of any directly comparative trial and the predominance of case reports as opposed to higher-level evidence

    External cardiac compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of patients with left ventricular assist devices

    No full text
    A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol to determine whether there is evidence that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by compressing the chest is safe and effective in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Manufacturers warn of a possible risk of device dislodgement if the chest is compressed. AMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, BNI and CINAHL were searched from inception to March 2014. Animal studies, case reports, case series, case–control studies, randomized controlled studies and systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion. Opinion articles with no reference to data were excluded. Of 45 unique results, 3 articles merited inclusion. A total of 10 patients with LVADs received chest compression during resuscitation. There was no report of device dislodgement as judged by postarrest flow rate, autopsy and resumption of effective circulation and/or neurological function. The longest duration of chest compression was 150 min. However, there are no comparisons of the efficacy of chest compressions relative to alternative means of external CPR, such as abdominal-only compressions. The absence of high-quality data precludes definitive recommendation of any particular form of CPR, in patients with LVADs. However, data identified suggest that chest compression is not as unsafe as previously thought. The efficacy of chest compressions in this patient population has not yet been investigated. Further research is required to address both the safety and efficacy of chest compressions in this population. Urgent presentation and publication of further evidence will inform future guidance

    Recurrent respiratory distress and cardiopulmonary arrest caused by megaoesophagus secondary to achalasia

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Respiratory distress and arrest from tracheal compression secondary to megaoesophagus are rare complications of achalasia. We present the case of a man with end-stage achalasia who required oesophagectomy to prevent recurrent life-threatening tracheal compression and respiratory arrest. A literature review is also presented. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 40-year old man presented with post-prandial stridor which resolved spontaneously, later being diagnosed with achalasia. He underwent pneumatic dilatation year later, intended as definitive treatment. Despite intervention, the patient had developed megaoesophagus. One month later he presented with tracheal compression and cardiorespiratory arrest but was successfully resuscitated. He subsequently underwent elective oesophagectomy. DISCUSSION: Over 40 case reports of achalasia presenting with stridor have been published. However, only three cases (all female, age range, 35–79 years old) of cardiac, respiratory or cardiorespiratory arrest have been published. The definitive treatments received by these patients were botulinum toxin injections, open Heller cardiomyotomy with Dor fundoplication and pneumatic dilatation. None of these patients suffered recurrent respiratory distress following definitive treatment. The patient currently reported was unique as he suffered cardiorespiratory arrest following an intended definitive treatment, pneumatic dilatation. As such oesophagectomy was considered the greatest risk-reduction intervention. CONCLUSION: Oesophagectomy should be considered for patients with end-stage achalasia and mega-oesophagus causing respiratory compromise to avoid potential fatal complications such as tracheal compression and subsequent respiratory arrest

    Tips for GP trainees working in plastic surgery

    No full text

    A cross-sectional study of the presence of United Kingdom (UK) plastic surgeons on social media

    No full text
    Introduction and aims To determine the uptake and usage of websites and social media (SM) by UK consultant (attending) plastic surgeons. Methods Professional profiles of full BAPRAS members were searched on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, RealSelf, YouTube, ResearchGate in May 2013. Additional surgeons were identified from the follower lists of @BAPRASvoice and @BAAPSMedia. Website ownership was determined on Google. Searches were repeated three times. Dual BAAPS-BAPRAS members were identified from www.baaps.org.uk. Results There were 156 (48.3%) dual BAAPS-BAPRAS members and 36 BAPRAS-only members. Fifty seven (18%) surgeons had no account on any platform whereas 266 (82%) were on at least one platform. One hundred and sixty four (51%) had personal websites whilst 37 (11%) had profiles on partnership websites. One hundred and sixteen (36%) had no website presence whilst 2% had websites under construction. The platform most surgeons use is LinkedIn (52%) whilst smaller proportions used Facebook (4%) and Twitter (22%). Surgeons had a mean of 126 (range: 0–3270) Twitter followers and 368 (range: 7–3786) fans/‘likes’ of their Facebook profiles. Time spent in postgraduate practice was not predictive of website ownership or SM use. However, dual BAAPS-BAPRAS members were significantly more likely to own a personal website, Twitter, RealSelf and YouTube accounts. Conclusions There has been an increase in the uptake of social media by UK plastic surgeons, especially in those with aesthetic surgery interests. However, very few surgeons have optimised their web presence. Continued education and appropriate usage guidance may promote uptake, particularly by reconstructive surgeons.</p

    Cytomegalovirus pouchitis in a patient with Crohn's disease

    No full text
    Colectomy with ileoanal pouch formation is usually contraindicated in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) due to the risk of recurrent disease and pouch failure. We report the case of a patient, initially thought to have ulcerative colitis (UC), who underwent such surgery but subsequently developed perianal CD. She presented with diarrhoea and weight loss. Inflammatory markers were raised. Pouchoscopy revealed deep ulcers within the pouch. The main differential diagnoses were idiopathic pouchitis and recurrent CD. However, immunohistochemical staining demonstrated positivity for cytomegalovirus (CMV). Stool frequency, C reactive protein and albumin normalised within 48 h of starting oral valgancyclovir. At 15 weeks, pouch appearances were improved, no histological evidence of CMV was found and baseline pouch function had returned. This case highlights that CD can present many years after surgery for apparent UC. Also, CMV pouchitis should be considered as a differential cause of pouchitis especially as it is treatable with antiviral therapy
    corecore