241 research outputs found

    Geometrically bounding 3-manifold, volume and Betti number

    Full text link
    It is well known that an arbitrary closed orientable 33-manifold can be realized as the unique boundary of a compact orientable 44-manifold, that is, any closed orientable 33-manifold is cobordant to zero. In this paper, we consider the geometric cobordism problem: a hyperbolic 33-manifold is geometrically bounding if it is the only boundary of a totally geodesic hyperbolic 4-manifold. However, there are very rare geometrically bounding closed hyperbolic 3-manifolds according to the previous research [11,13]. Let v4.3062v \approx 4.3062\ldots be the volume of the regular right-angled hyperbolic dodecahedron in H3\mathbb{H}^{3}, for each nZ+n \in \mathbb{Z}_{+} and each odd integer kk in [1,5n+3][1,5n+3], we construct a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold MM with β1(M)=k\beta^1(M)=k and vol(M)=16nvvol(M)=16nv that bounds a totally geodesic hyperbolic 4-manifold. The proof uses small cover theory over a sequence of linearly-glued dodecahedra and some results of Kolpakov-Martelli-Tschantz [9].Comment: the latest version that adjust some figures and add more detail description

    SELF-BUMPINGS ON KLEINIAN ONCE-PUNCTURED TORUS GROUPS

    Full text link

    The moduli space of the modular group in three-dimensional complex hyperbolic geometry

    Full text link
    We study the moduli space of discrete, faithful, type-preserving representations of the modular group PSL(2,Z)\mathbf{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) into PU(3,1)\mathbf{PU}(3,1). The entire moduli space M\mathcal{M} is a union of M(0,2π3,4π3)\mathcal{M}(0,\frac{2\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3}), M(2π3,4π3,4π3)\mathcal{M}(\frac{2\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3}) and some isolated points. This is the first Fuchsian group such that its PU(3,1)\mathbf{PU}(3,1)-representations space has been entirely constructed. Both M(0,2π3,4π3)\mathcal{M}(0,\frac{2\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3}) and M(2π3,4π3,4π3)\mathcal{M}(\frac{2\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3}) are parameterized by a square, where two opposite sides of the square correspond to representations of PSL(2,Z)\mathbf{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z}) into the smaller group PU(2,1)\mathbf{PU}(2,1). In particular, both sub moduli spaces M(0,2π3,4π3)\mathcal{M}(0,\frac{2\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3} ) and M(2π3,4π3,4π3)\mathcal{M}(\frac{2\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3},\frac{4\pi}{3}) interpolate the geometries studied in \cite{FalbelKoseleff:2002} and \cite{Falbelparker:2003}

    Three-dimensional complex reflection groups via Ford domains

    Full text link
    We initiate the study of deformations of groups in three-dimensional complex hyperbolic geometry. Let G=ι1,ι2,ι3,ι4ι12=ι22=ι32=ι42=id,(ι1ι3)2=(ι1ι4)3=(ι2ι4)2=idG=\left\langle \iota_1, \iota_2, \iota_3, \iota_4 \Bigg| \begin{array}{c} \iota_1^2= \iota_2^2 = \iota_3^2=\iota_4^2=id,\\ (\iota_1 \iota_3)^{2}=(\iota_1 \iota_4)^{3}=(\iota_2 \iota_4)^{2}=id \end{array}\right\rangle be an abstract group. We study representations ρ:GPU(3,1)\rho: G \rightarrow \mathbf{PU}(3,1), where ρ(ιi)=Ii\rho( \iota_{i})=I_{i} is a complex reflection fixing a complex hyperbolic plane in HC3{\bf H}^{3}_{\mathbb C} for 1i41 \leq i \leq 4, with the additional condition that I1I2I_1I_2 is parabolic. When we assume two pairs of hyper-parallel complex hyperbolic planes have the same distance, then the moduli space M\mathcal{M} is parameterized by (h,t)[1,)×[0,π](h,t) \in [1, \infty) \times [0, \pi] but tarccos(3h2+14h2)t \leq \operatorname{arccos}(-\frac{3h^2+1}{4h^2}). In particular, t=0t=0 and t=arccos(3h2+14h2)t=\operatorname{arccos}(-\frac{3h^2+1}{4h^2}) degenerate to HR3{\bf H}^{3}_{\mathbb R}-geometry and HC2{\bf H}^{2}_{\mathbb C}-geometry respectively. Using the Ford domain of ρ(2,arccos(78))(G)\rho_{(\sqrt{2},\operatorname{arccos}(-\frac{7}{8}))}(G) as a guide, we show ρ(h,t)\rho_{(h,t)} is a discrete and faithful representation of GPU(3,1)G \rightarrow \mathbf{PU}(3,1) when (h,t)M(h,t) \in \mathcal{M} is near to (2,arccos(78))(\sqrt{2}, \operatorname{arccos}(-\frac{7}{8})). This is the first nontrivial example of the Ford domain of a subgroup in PU(3,1)\mathbf{PU}(3,1) that has been studied

    Complexification of an infinite volume Coxeter tetrahedron

    Full text link
    Let TT be an infinite volume Coxeter tetrahedron in three dimensional real hyperbolic space HR3{\bf H}^{3}_{\mathbb R} with two opposite right-angles and the other angles are all zeros. Let GG be the Coxeter group of TT, so G=ι1,ι2,ι3,ι4ι12=ι22=ι32=ι42=id,(ι1ι3)2=(ι2ι4)2=idG=\left\langle \iota_1, \iota_2, \iota_3, \iota_4 \Bigg| \begin{array} {c} \iota_1^2= \iota_2^2 = \iota_3^2=\iota_4^2=id, \\ (\iota_1 \iota_3)^{2}=(\iota_2 \iota_4)^{2}=id \end{array}\right\rangle as an abstract group. We study type-preserving representations ρ:GPU(3,1)\rho: G \rightarrow \mathbf{PU}(3,1), where ρ(ιi)=Ii\rho( \iota_{i})=I_{i} is a complex reflection fixing a complex hyperbolic plane in three dimensional complex hyperbolic space HC3{\bf H}^{3}_{\mathbb C} for 1i41 \leq i \leq 4. The moduli space M\mathcal{M} of these representations is parameterized by θ[5π6,π]\theta \in [\frac{5 \pi}{6}, \pi]. In particular, θ=5π6\theta=\frac{5 \pi}{6} and θ=π\theta=\pi degenerate to HC2{\bf H}^{2}_{\mathbb C}-geometry and HR3{\bf H}^{3}_{\mathbb R}-geometry respectively. Via Dirichlet domains, we show ρ=ρθ\rho=\rho_{\theta} is a discrete and faithful representation of the group GG for all θ[5π6,π]\theta \in [\frac{5 \pi}{6}, \pi]. This is the first nontrivial moduli space in three dimensional complex hyperbolic space that has been studied completely.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2306.1524

    High distance Heegaard splittings from involutions

    Get PDF
    AbstractFixed an oriented handlebody H=H+ with boundary F, let η(H+)=H− be the mirror image of H+ along F, so η(F) is the boundary of H−, for a map f:F→F, we have a 3-manifold by gluing H+ and H− along F with attaching map f, and denote it by Mf=H+∪f:F→FH−. In this note, we show that there are involutions f:F→F which are also reducible, such that Mf have arbitrarily high Heegaard distances

    Compact hyperbolic Coxeter four-polytopes with eight facets

    Full text link
    In this paper, we obtain the complete classification for compact hyperbolic Coxeter four-dimensional polytopes with eight facets.Comment: We corrected some textual typos about the cited authors/papers. Many thanks to Nikolay Bogache
    corecore