Brief Report: To squeeze or not to squeeze, that is the question! Optimizing the disease activity score in 28 joints by adding the squeeze test of metatarsophalangeal joints in early rheumatoid arthritis

Objective To optimize use of the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by adding the squeeze test of forefeet. Methods The squeeze test is used to examine bilateral compression pain (BCP) across the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints. For this study, data for patients participating in the Treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort study, an ongoing clinical trial that evaluates different induction therapies in patients with early RA, were randomly divided into 2 subsets. In subset 1 (149 patients and 819 disease activity assessments), the mathematical function of the DAS28-squeeze was constructed using a linear regression model with the DAS as the dependent variable and the DAS28 and squeeze test as the independent variables. A DAS28-BCP disease state was also constructed, in which DAS28 disease state categorizations were upgraded one state if the result of the squeeze test was positive. In subset 2 (153 patients and 754 assessments), concordance in disease states between the DAS28, DAS28-squeeze, and DAS28-BCP disease states was compared, using both the DAS and Boolean-defined remission criteria as reference. Results Agreement between the DAS and the DAS28-squeeze (82%) was significantly higher than agreement between the DAS and the DAS28 (76%). When we assessed the group of patients who had arthritis of the forefeet only (22 patients and 46 assessments), overall agreement between the DAS and the DAS28 was 40%, while agreement between the DAS and the DAS28-squeeze was 59% and that between the DAS and the DAS28-BCP disease state was 65%. Furthermore, the specificities of the DAS28-squeeze and the DAS28-BCP (80% and 81%, respectively) were higher than that of the DAS28 (76%), while the sensitivities of the DAS28, DAS28-squeeze, and DAS28-BCP to identify true remission according to the Boolean criteria were 88%, 87%, and 81%, respectively. Conclusion Adding the squeeze test of forefeet to the DAS28 has value for dependably classifying the disease state in patients with early RA

Tapering conventional synthetic DMARDs in patients with early arthritis in sustained remission: 2-year follow-up of the tREACH trial

OBJECTIVES: With early and intensive treatment many patients with early RA attain remission. Aims were to investigate (1) the frequency and time to sustained remission and subsequent tapering in patients initially treated with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug ((cs)DMARD) strategies and (2) the frequency and time to flare and regained remission in patients tapering csDMARDs and biological (b)DMARDs during 2 years of follow-up.METHODS: Two-year follow-up data from the treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort (tREACH) cohort were used. Patients were randomised to initial treatment with triple DMARD therapy (iTDT) with glucocorticoid (GC) bridging or methotrexate monotherapy (iMM) with GC bridging. Patients were evaluated every 3 months. In case Disease Activity Score (DAS) was &gt;2.4 treatment was switched to a TNF-blocker. In case DAS&lt;1.6 at 2 consecutive time points, tapering was initiated according to protocol. Outcomes were rates of sustained remission (DAS&lt;1.6 at 2 consecutive time points), flare (medication increase after tapering) and remission after flare (DAS&lt;1.6). Data were analysed using Kaplan-Meier analyses.RESULTS: During 2 years of follow-up, sustained remission was achieved at least once by 159 (57%) of patients, of whom 118 and 23 patients initiated tapering of csDMARDs and bDMARDs, respectively. Thirty-four patients achieved drug-free remission. Flare rates were 41% and 37% and within 1 year, respectively. After flare, 65% of patients tapering csDMARDs re-achieved remission within 6 months after treatment intensification.CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of initial treatment strategy, 57% of patients achieved sustained remission during 2 years of follow-up. Flare rates were 41% and 37% within 12 months in patients tapering csDMARDs and bDMARDs, respectively.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN26791028; Post-results.</p

Disease association of two distinct interleukin-18 promoter polymorphisms in Caucasian rheumatoid arthritis patients

Interleukin (IL)-18 is an important mediator of innate and adaptive immunity. We searched for an association of IL-18 promoter single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Caucasians. The entire study population was composed of two independent cohorts from Germany (n=200) and Scotland (n=410). Presence of IL-18 SNP at positions -607 and -137 was determined by allele-specific PCR in 327 RA patients and 283 healthy donors (HD). Diplotype distributions of both loci were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the German and Scottish HD cohorts. In contrast, locus -607 was in HW disequilibrium in German, and locus -137 in Scottish RA patients. Diplotypic exact chi(2) tests suggested that -607CC was overrepresented in German, and -137CC in Scottish RA patients, but conservative chi(2) trend analyses could not prove any significant disease association of these single loci. SNP -607 and -137 were in strong linkage disequilibrium. The -607C(*)-137C haplotype was more prevalent in German RA (3.2 vs 1.2%) and in Scottish RA patients (4.1 vs 0.9%) than in the respective HD cohorts. These observations suggest that SNP of both positions contribute to the genetic background of RA pathogenesis

A review of the MHC genetics of rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a common complex genetic disease, and, despite a significant genetic element, no gene other than HLA-DRB1 has been clearly demonstrated to be involved in the disease. However, this association accounts for less than half the overall genetic susceptibility. Investigation of other candidate genes, in particular those that reside within the major histocompatibility complex, are hampered by the presence of strong linkage disequilibrium and problems with study design