13 research outputs found

    Successful management of multiple permanent pacemaker complications – infection, 13 year old silent lead perforation and exteriorisation following failed percutaneous extraction, superior vena cava obstruction, tricuspid valve endocarditis, pulmonary embolism and prosthetic tricuspid valve thrombosis

    Get PDF
    A 59 year old man underwent mechanical tricuspid valve replacement and removal of pacemaker generator along with 4 pacemaker leads for pacemaker endocarditis and superior vena cava obstruction after an earlier percutaneous extraction had to be abandoned, 13 years ago, due to cardiac arrest, accompanied by silent, unsuspected right atrial perforation and exteriorisation of lead. Postoperative course was complicated by tricuspid valve thrombosis and secondary pulmonary embolism requiring TPA thrombolysis which was instantly successful. A review of literature of pacemaker endocarditis and tricuspid thrombosis along with the relevant management strategies is presented. We believe this case report is unusual on account of non operative management of right atrial lead perforation following an unsuccessful attempt at percutaneous removal of right sided infected pacemaker leads and the incidental discovery of the perforated lead 13 years later at sternotomy, presentation of pacemaker endocarditis with a massive load of vegetations along the entire pacemaker lead tract in superior vena cava, right atrial endocardium, tricuspid valve and right ventricular endocardium, leading to a functional and structural SVC obstruction, requirement of an unusually large dose of warfarin postoperatively occasioned, in all probability, by antibiotic drug interactions, presentation of tricuspid prosthetic valve thrombosis uniquely as vasovagal syncope and isolated hypoxia and near instantaneous resolution of tricuspid prosthetic valve thrombosis with Alteplase thrombolysis

    Safety of ACE inhibitor therapies in patients with chronic kidney disease

    No full text
    Introduction: ACE inhibitors are first-line therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The main adverse effects of ACE inhibitors are hypotension, renal function impairment and hyperkalemia. Areas covered: This paper reviews evidence from clinical studies regarding adverse effects of ACE inhibitors in patients with CKD. The safety aspects of ACE inhibitors are discussed in relation to their pharmacological action, drug-drug interactions, drug-diet interaction, precautions needed in certain clinical conditions and other adverse effects. Expert opinion: The main adverse effects of ACE inhibitors follow from their interaction with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS)-activity and volume depletion. This interaction can be turned into clinical benefit and increase efficacy of ACE inhibitors by reduction in dietary sodium or adding diuretics. Dual RAAS-blockade is no longer advocated in patients with CKD because of the safety issues, and combination of ACE inhibitors with moderate reduction in dietary sodium intake is a better alternative. The intensified treatment regimens based on ACE inhibitors can potentially improve renoprotection, but increase the risk of adverse effects. Better strategies to address safety concerns are needed. Introduction of clinical rules and safety indicators may help clinicians to identify hazardous co-prescriptions and adverse dietary habits and can decrease the frequency of adverse effects
    corecore