Late‐stage calcites in the Permian Capitan Formation and its equivalents, Delaware Basin margin, west Texas and New Mexico: evidence for replacement of precursor evaporites

Comparison of Upper Guadalupian fore‐reef, reef and back‐reef strata from outcrops in the Guadalupe Mountains with equivalent subsurface cores from the northern and eastern margins of the Delaware Basin indicates that extensive evaporite diagenesis has occurred in both areas. In both surface and subsurface sections, the original sediments were extensively dolomitized and most primary and secondary porosity was filled with anhydrite. These evaporites were emplaced by reflux of evaporitic fluids from shelf settings through solution‐enlarged fractures and karstic sink holes into the underlying strata. Outcrop areas today, however, contain no preserved evaporites in reef and fore‐reef sections and only partial remnants of evaporites are retained in back‐reef settings. In their place, these rocks contain minor silica, very large volumes of coarse sparry calcite and some secondary porosity. The replacement minerals locally form pseudomorphs of their evaporite precursors and, less commonly, contain solid anhydrite inclusions. Some silicification, dissolution of anhydrite and conversion of anhydrite to gypsum have occurred in these strata where they are still buried at depths in excess of 1 km; however, no calcite replacements were noted from any subsurface core samples. Subsurface alteration has also led to the widespread, late‐stage development of large‐ and small‐scale dissolution breccias. The restriction of calcite cements to very near‐surface sections, petrographic evidence that the calcites post‐date hydrocarbon emplacement, and the highly variable but generally ‘light’carbon and oxygen isotopic signatures of the spars all indicate that calcite precipitation is a very late diagenetic (telogenetic) phenomenon. Evaporite dissolution and calcitization reactions have only taken place where Permian strata were flushed with meteoric fluids as a consequence of Tertiary uplift, tilting and breaching of regional hydrological seals. A typical sequence of alteration involves initial corrosion of anhydrite, one or more stage

Cross-talk between tight and anchoring junctions-lesson from the testis

Spermatogenesis takes place in the seminiferous tubules in adult testes such as rats, in which developing germ cells must traverse the seminiferous epithelium while spermatogonia (2n, diploid) undergo mitotic and meiotic divisions, and differentiate into elongated spermatids (1n, haploid). It is conceivable that this event involves extensive junction restructuring particularly at the blood-testis barrier (BTB, a structure that segregates the seminiferous epithelium into the basal and the adluminal compartments) that occurs at stages VII-VIII of the seminiferous epithelial cycle. As such, cross-talk between tight (TJ) and anchoring junctions [e.g., basal ectoplasmic specialization (basal ES), adherens junction (AJ), desmosome-like junction (DJ)] at the BTB must occur to coordinate the transient opening of the BTB to facilitate preleptotene spermatocyte migration. Interestingly, while there are extensively restructuring at the BTB during the epithelial cycle, the immunological barrier function of the BTB must be maintained without disruption even transiently. Recent studies using the androgen suppression and Adjudin models have shown that anchoring junction restructuring that leads to germ cell loss from the seminiferous epithelium also promotes the production of AJ (e.g., basal ES) proteins (such as N-cadherins, catenins) at the BTB site. We postulate the testis is using a similar mechanism during spermatogenesis at stage VIII of the epithelial cycle that these induced basal ES proteins, likely form a "patch" surrounding the BTB, transiently maintain the BTB integrity while TJ is "opened", such as induced by TGF-b3 or TNFa, to facilitate preleptotene spermatocyte migration. However, in other stages of the epithelial cycle other than VII and VIII when the BTB remains "closed" (for ∼10 days), anchoring junctions (e.g., AJ, DJ, and apical ES) restructuring continues to facilitate germ cell movement. Interestingly, the mechanism(s) that governs this communication between TJ and anchoring junction (e.g., basal ES and AJ) in the testis has remained obscure until recently. Herein, we provide a critical review based on the recently available data regarding the cross-talk between TJ and anchoring junction to allow simultaneous maintenance of the BTB and germ cell movement across the seminiferous epithelium. © 2008 Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media.link_to_subscribed_fulltex