Efficacy and safety of three different cumulative doses of intravenous methylprednisolone for moderate to severe and active Graves' orbitopathy

BACKGROUND: Optimal doses of i.v. glucocorticoids for Graves' orbitopathy (GO) are undefined. METHODS: We carried out a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial to determine efficacy and safety of three doses of i.v. methylprednisolone in 159 patients with moderate to severe and active GO. Patients were randomized to receive a cumulative dose of 2.25, 4.98, or 7.47 g in 12 weekly infusions. Efficacy was evaluated objectively at 12 wk by blinded ophthalmologists and subjectively by blinded patients (using a GO specific quality of life questionnaire). Adverse events were recorded at each visit. RESULTS: Overall ophthalmic improvement was more common using 7.47 g (52%) than 4.98 g (35%; P = 0.03) or 2.25 g (28%; P = 0.01). Compared with lower doses, the high-dose regimen led to the most improvement in objective measurement of ocular motility and in the Clinical Activity Score. The Clinical Activity Score decreased in all groups and to the least extent with 2.25 g. Quality of life improved most in the 7.47-g group, although not reaching statistical significance. No significant differences occurred in exophthalmos, palpebral aperture, soft tissue changes, and subjective diplopia score. Dysthyroid optic neuropathy developed in several patients in all groups. Because of this, differences among the three groups were no longer apparent at the exploratory 24-wk visit. Major adverse events were slightly more frequent using the highest dose but occurred also using the lowest dose. Among patients whose GO improved at 12 wk, 33% in the 7.47-group, 21% in the 4.98-group, and 40% in the 2.25-group had relapsing orbitopathy after glucocorticoid withdrawal at the exploratory 24-wk visit. CONCLUSIONS: The 7.47-g dose provides short-term advantages over lower doses. However, this benefit is transient and associated with slightly greater toxicity. The use of a cumulative dose of 7.47 g of methylprednisolone provides short-term advantage over lower doses. This may suggest that an intermediate-dose regimen be used in most cases and the high-dose regimen be reserved to most severe cases of GO

Efficacy and safety of three different cumulative doses of intravenous methylprednisolone for moderate to severe and active Graves' orbitopathy

BACKGROUND: Optimal doses of i.v. glucocorticoids for Graves' orbitopathy (GO) are undefined. METHODS: We carried out a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial to determine efficacy and safety of three doses of i.v. methylprednisolone in 159 patients with moderate to severe and active GO. Patients were randomized to receive a cumulative dose of 2.25, 4.98, or 7.47 g in 12 weekly infusions. Efficacy was evaluated objectively at 12 wk by blinded ophthalmologists and subjectively by blinded patients (using a GO specific quality of life questionnaire). Adverse events were recorded at each visit. RESULTS: Overall ophthalmic improvement was more common using 7.47 g (52%) than 4.98 g (35%; P = 0.03) or 2.25 g (28%; P = 0.01). Compared with lower doses, the high-dose regimen led to the most improvement in objective measurement of ocular motility and in the Clinical Activity Score. The Clinical Activity Score decreased in all groups and to the least extent with 2.25 g. Quality of life improved most in the 7.47-g group, although not reaching statistical significance. No significant differences occurred in exophthalmos, palpebral aperture, soft tissue changes, and subjective diplopia score. Dysthyroid optic neuropathy developed in several patients in all groups. Because of this, differences among the three groups were no longer apparent at the exploratory 24-wk visit. Major adverse events were slightly more frequent using the highest dose but occurred also using the lowest dose. Among patients whose GO improved at 12 wk, 33% in the 7.47-group, 21% in the 4.98-group, and 40% in the 2.25-group had relapsing orbitopathy after glucocorticoid withdrawal at the exploratory 24-wk visit. CONCLUSIONS: The 7.47-g dose provides short-term advantages over lower doses. However, this benefit is transient and associated with slightly greater toxicity. The use of a cumulative dose of 7.47 g of methylprednisolone provides short-term advantage over lower doses. This may suggest that an intermediate-dose regimen be used in most cases and the high-dose regimen be reserved to most severe cases of GO

Animal Models for Prenatal Gene Therapy: Choosing the Right Model

Testing in animal models is an essential requirement during development of prenatal gene therapy for -clinical application. Some information can be derived from cell lines or cultured fetal cells, such as the efficiency of gene transfer and the vector dose that might be required. Fetal tissues can also be maintained in culture for short periods of time and transduced ex vivo. Ultimately, however, the use of animals is unavoidable since in vivo experiments allow the length and level of transgene expression to be measured, and provide an assessment of the effect of the delivery procedure and the gene therapy on fetal and neonatal development. The choice of animal model is determined by the nature of the disease and characteristics of the animal, such as its size, lifespan, and immunology, the number of fetuses and their development, parturition, and the length of gestation and the placentation. The availability of a disease model is also critical. In this chapter, we discuss the various animal models that can be used and consider how their characteristics can affect the results obtained. The projection to human application and the regulatory hurdles are also presented