Phase I/II study of DHA–paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin in patients with advanced malignant solid tumours

DHA–paclitaxel is a conjugate of paclitaxel and the fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid. Preclinical studies have demonstrated increased activity, relative to paclitaxel, with the potential for an improved therapeutic ratio. We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated doses of DHA–paclitaxel and carboplatin when administered in combination. Two cohorts of patients were treated: carboplatin AUC 5 with DHA–paclitaxel 660 mg m-2 and carboplatin AUC 5 with DHA–paclitaxel 880 mg m-2. Both drugs were given on day 1 every 21 days. A total of 15 patients were enrolled with a median age of 59 years (range 33–71). All patients had advanced cancer refractory to standard treatment, performance status 0–2 and were without major organ dysfunction. A total of 54 cycles of treatment were delivered. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in the first cohort of three patients. In an expanded second cohort, neutropenia was the main DLT, occurring in the first cycle of treatment in five of 12 patients: three of these patients and one additional patient also experienced dose-limiting grade 3 transient rises in liver transaminases. No alopecia was seen and one patient developed clinically significant neuropathy. One partial response was seen in a patient with advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophago-gastric junction and 12 patients had stable disease with a median time to progression of 184 days (range 60–506 days). The recommended phase II dose in pretreated patients is Carboplatin AUC 5 and DHA–paclitaxel 660 mg m-2 given every 21 days. Further studies with Carboplatin AUC 5 and DHA-paclitaxel 880 mg m-2, given every 28 days, are warranted in chemo-naive patients

Clinical chronobiology: a timely consideration in critical care medicine

A fundamental aspect of human physiology is its cyclical nature over a 24-h period, a feature conserved across most life on Earth. Organisms compartmentalise processes with respect to time in order to promote survival, in a manner that mirrors the rotation of the planet and accompanying diurnal cycles of light and darkness. The influence of circadian rhythms can no longer be overlooked in clinical settings; this review provides intensivists with an up-to-date understanding of the burgeoning field of chronobiology, and suggests ways to incorporate these concepts into daily practice to improve patient outcomes. We outline the function of molecular clocks in remote tissues, which adjust cellular and global physiological function according to the time of day, and the potential clinical advantages to keeping in time with them. We highlight the consequences of "chronopathology", when this harmony is lost, and the risk factors for this condition in critically ill patients. We introduce the concept of "chronofitness" as a new target in the treatment of critical illness: preserving the internal synchronisation of clocks in different tissues, as well as external synchronisation with the environment. We describe methods for monitoring circadian rhythms in a clinical setting, and how this technology may be used for identifying optimal time windows for interventions, or to alert the physician to a critical deterioration of circadian rhythmicity. We suggest a chronobiological approach to critical illness, involving multicomponent strategies to promote chronofitness (chronobundles), and further investment in the development of personalised, time-based treatment for critically ill patients