21 research outputs found

    Integrating harm reduction into acute care: A single center's experienceCentral MessagePerspective

    No full text
    Objective: Injection drug use (IDU) is prevalent in North America and is associated with presentations with infective endocarditis. Supporting patients who present with infective endocarditis related to IDU through harm reduction, a pragmatic approach to reduce secondary harms of a health behavior, helps address the underlying IDU. We share a case exemplar of how one acute care facility integrated harm-reduction practices into daily patient care. Methods: We took a 3-stage approach to integrate harm-reduction practices into daily patient care. In stage 1, we raised awareness and knowledge of harm reduction through education. In stage 2, we provided explicit support for harm reduction. In stage 3, we provided tangible tools to support harm reduction. Results: More than 300 staff attended education sessions and reported increased knowledge related to substances, harm reduction, and engaging patients who use substances in conversations. Staff requested the hospital explicitly support harm reduction, which led to stage 2. The creation of a harm-reduction philosophy statement provided permission to engage in harm-reduction practices. Stage 3 included the creation of a harm-reduction supply distribution program and consultations with Addictions Medicine and treatment programs. The implementation of harm-reduction supply distribution was successful and is being spread across the facility. Conclusions: Engaging in harm-reduction practices within an acute care facility is possible through a multistage process focused on education, explicit support, and tangible tools. Spreading harm-reduction integration and working with patients who used substances to evaluate effectiveness are key next steps

    Leishmania major Infection in Humanized Mice Induces Systemic Infection and Provokes a Nonprotective Human Immune Response

    Get PDF
    Background Leishmania (L.) species are the causative agent of leishmaniasis. Due to the lack of efficient vaccine candidates, drug therapies are the only option to deal with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Unfortunately, chemotherapeutic interventions show high toxicity in addition to an increased risk of dissemination of drug-resistant parasites. An appropriate laboratory animal based model is still missing which allows testing of new drug strategies in the context of human immune cells in vivo. Methodology/Principal Findings Humanized mice were infected subcutaneously with stationary phase promastigote L. major into the footpad. The human immune response against the pathogen and the parasite host interactions were analyzed. In addition we proved the versatility of this new model to conduct drug research studies by the inclusion of orally given Miltefosine. We show that inflammatory human macrophages get infected with Leishmania parasites at the site of infection. Furthermore, a Leishmania-specific human-derived T cell response is initiated. However, the human immune system is not able to prevent systemic infection. Thus, we treated the mice with Miltefosine to reduce the parasitic load. Notably, this chemotherapy resulted in a reduction of the parasite load in distinct organs. Comparable to some Miltefosine treated patients, humanized mice developed severe side effects, which are not detectable in the classical murine model of experimental leishmaniasis. Conclusions/Significance This study describes for the first time L. major infection in humanized mice, characterizes the disease development, the induction of human adaptive and innate immune response including cytokine production and the efficiency of Miltefosine treatment in these animals. In summary, humanized mice might be beneficial for future preclinical chemotherapeutic studies in systemic (visceral) leishmaniasis allowing the investigation of human immune response, side effects of the drug due to cytokine production of activated humane immune cells and the efficiency of the treatment to eliminate also not replicating (“hiding”) parasites

    Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Staphylococcus Aureus Isolated at a General Hospital in Vietnam Between 2014 and 2021

    No full text
    Nguyen Van An,1,* Le Ha long Hai,2,3,* Vu Huy Luong,4,5 Nguyen Thi Ha Vinh,5,6 Pham Quynh Hoa,7 Le Van Hung,5,7 Nguyen Thai Son,1 Le Thu Hong,1 Dinh Viet Hung,8 Hoang Trung Kien,9 Minh Nhat Le,10,11 Nguyen Hoang Viet,12 Duc Hoang Nguyen,13 Ngai Van Pham,14 Ta Ba Thang,15 Tran Viet Tien,16 Le Huy Hoang17 1Department of Microbiology, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 2Department of Clinical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 3Department of Biochemistry, Hematology and Immunology, National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam; 4Department of Laser and Skin Care, National hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam; 5Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 6Department of General Planning, National hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam; 7Department of Microbiology, Mycology and Parasitology, National hospital of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi, Vietnam; 8Department of Psychiatry, Military Medical 103, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 9Department of Immunology, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 10Tay Nguyen Institute of Science Research, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, VAST, Hanoi, Vietnam; 11Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Disease, Tokyo, Japan; 12Molecular Pathology Department, Faculty of Medical Technology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 13Cardiovascular Laboratories, Methodist Hospital, Merrillville, Indiana, USA; 14Medical Testing Center, Medlatec Group, Hanoi, Vietnam; 15Respiratory Center, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 16Department of Infectious diseases, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Medical Military University, Hanoi, Vietnam; 17Department of Bacteriology, National of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Le Huy Hoang, Department of Bacteriology, National of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam, Tel + 84 977 803 986, Email [email protected]: Staphylococcus aureus is a commensal bacteria species that can cause various illnesses, from mild skin infections to severe diseases, such as bacteremia. The distribution and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pattern of S. aureus varies by population, time, geographic location, and hospital wards. In this study, we elucidated the epidemiology and AMR patterns of S. aureus isolated from a general hospital in Vietnam.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Data on all S. aureus infections from 2014 to 2021 were collected from the Microbiology department of Military Hospital 103, Vietnam. Only the first isolation from each kind of specimen from a particular patient was analyzed using the Cochran–Armitage and chi-square tests.Results: A total of 1130 individuals were diagnosed as S. aureus infection. Among them, 1087 strains were tested for AMR features. Most patients with S. aureus infection were in the age group of 41– 65 years (39.82%). S. aureus isolates were predominant in the surgery wards, and pus specimens were the most common source of isolates (50.62%). S. aureus was most resistant to azithromycin (82.28%), erythromycin (82.82%), and clindamycin (82.32%) and least resistant to teicoplanin (0.0%), tigecycline (0.16%), quinupristin-dalfopristin (0.43%), linezolid (0.62%), and vancomycin (2.92%). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. aureus were prevalent, accounting for 73.02% and 60.90% of the total strains respectively, and the strains isolated from the intensive care unit (ICU) had the highest percentage of multidrug resistance (77.78%) among the wards.Conclusion: These findings highlight the urgent need for continuous AMR surveillance and updated treatment guidelines, particularly considering high resistance in MRSA, MDR strains, and ICU isolates. Future research focusing on specific resistant populations and potential intervention strategies is crucial to combat this rising threat.Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, antimicrobial resistance, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, multidrug resistance, Hanoi, Vietna
    corecore