Clinical reports of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: a citation network analysis

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer is a commonly performed and well-established practice of similar to 50 years standing. However, there have been no controlled studies, randomised or otherwise. We sought to investigate the evidence base that has been used in establishing its status as a standard of care.METHODS: Among 51 papers used in a recent systematic review and quantitative synthesis, a citation network analysis was performed. A total of 344 publications (the 51 index papers and a further 293 cited in them) constitute the citation network.RESULTS: The pattern of citation is that of a citation cascade. Specific analyses show the frequent use of historical or landmark papers, which add authority. Papers expressing an opposing viewpoint are rarely cited.CONCLUSIONS: The citation network for this common and well-established practice provides an example of selective citation. This pattern of citation tends to escalate belief in a clinical practice even when it lacks a high-quality evidence base and may create an impression of more authority than is warranted.British Journal of Cancer (2011) 104, 1085-1097. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606060 www.bjcancer.comPublished online 8 March 2011 (c) 2011 Cancer Research U

Sequential surgical resection of hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

# The Author(s) 2010. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Background Resection of isolated hepatic or pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer is widely accepted and associated with a 5-year survival rate of 25–40%. The value of aggressive surgical management in patients with both hepatic and pulmonary metastases still remains a controversial area. Materials and methods A retrospective review of 1,497 patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) was analysed. Of 73 patients identified with resection of CRC and, at some point in time, both liver and lung metastases, 17 patients underwent metastasectomy (resection group). The remaining 56 patients comprised the non-resection group. Primary tumour, hepatic and pulmonary metastases of all patients were surgically treated in our department of surgery, and the results are that of a single institution. Results The resection group had a 3-year survival of 77%, a 5-year survival of 55 % and a 10-year survival of 18%; median survival was 98 months. The longest overall survival was 136 months; six patients are still alive. In the resection group, overall survival was significantly higher than in the non-resection group (p<0.01). Independent from the chronology of metastasectomy, 5-year survival was 55 % with respect to the primary resection, 28 % with respect to the first metastasectomy and 14 % with respect t

Do metastatic colorectal cancer patients who present with late relapse after curative surgery have a better survival?

BackgroundPatients who relapse after potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer tend to relapse within 5 years. There is, however, a group of patients who relapse beyond 5 years after resection and this late relapsing group may have a different behaviour and prognosis.MethodsWe analysed data from a prospective population-based registry to compare the characteristics and survival of relapsed patients with metachronous mCRC. Patients were categorised into relapse at 5 years following their initial surgery. Univariate log-rank tests and multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine whether time to relapse (TTR) and other factors were associated with overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 750 metachronous mCRC patients were identified. In all, 56% relapsed ≤2 years, 32.4% at 2-5 years and 11.6% >5 years. Median survival time from the time of diagnosis of mCRC for the three groups was 17.6, 26.1 and 27.5 months, respectively. Short TTR (5 years vs ConclusionTTR within 2 years is an independent predictor of shorter survival time for mCRC patients who experience a relapse. These data do not support the hypothesis that patients who have late relapse late (>5 years) have a 'better' biology or survival compared with patients with a TTR of 2-5 years.V T Broadbridge, C S Karapetis, C Beeke, R J Woodman, R Padbury, G Maddern, S W Kim, D Roder, P Hakendorf and T J Pric