2 research outputs found
The luminosity function of field galaxies
Schmidt's method for construction of luminosity function of galaxies is
generalized by taking into account the dependence of density of galaxies from
the distance in the near Universe. The logarithmical luminosity function (LLF)
of field galaxies depending on morphological type is constructed. We show that
the LLF for all galaxies, and also separately for elliptical and lenticular
galaxies can be presented by Schechter function in narrow area of absolute
magnitudes. The LLF of spiral galaxies was presented by Schechter function for
enough wide area of absolute magnitudes: . Spiral galaxies differ slightly by
parameter . At transition from early spirals to the late spirals parameter in
Schechter function is reduced. The reduction of mean luminosity of galaxies is
observed at transition from elliptical galaxies to lenticular galaxies, to
early spiral galaxies, and further, to late spiral galaxies, in a bright end, .
The completeness and the average density of samples of galaxies of different
morphological types are estimated. In the range the mean number density of all
galaxies is equal 0.127 Mpc-3.Comment: 14 page, 8 figures, to appear in Astrophysic
Shedding Light on the Galaxy Luminosity Function
From as early as the 1930s, astronomers have tried to quantify the
statistical nature of the evolution and large-scale structure of galaxies by
studying their luminosity distribution as a function of redshift - known as the
galaxy luminosity function (LF). Accurately constructing the LF remains a
popular and yet tricky pursuit in modern observational cosmology where the
presence of observational selection effects due to e.g. detection thresholds in
apparent magnitude, colour, surface brightness or some combination thereof can
render any given galaxy survey incomplete and thus introduce bias into the LF.
Over the last seventy years there have been numerous sophisticated
statistical approaches devised to tackle these issues; all have advantages --
but not one is perfect. This review takes a broad historical look at the key
statistical tools that have been developed over this period, discussing their
relative merits and highlighting any significant extensions and modifications.
In addition, the more generalised methods that have emerged within the last few
years are examined. These methods propose a more rigorous statistical framework
within which to determine the LF compared to some of the more traditional
methods. I also look at how photometric redshift estimations are being
incorporated into the LF methodology as well as considering the construction of
bivariate LFs. Finally, I review the ongoing development of completeness
estimators which test some of the fundamental assumptions going into LF
estimators and can be powerful probes of any residual systematic effects
inherent magnitude-redshift data.Comment: 95 pages, 23 figures, 3 tables. Now published in The Astronomy &
Astrophysics Review. This version: bring in line with A&AR format
requirements, also minor typo corrections made, additional citations and
higher rez images adde