Impact of non-axillary sentinel node biopsy on staging and treatment of breast cancer patients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of lymphatic drainage to non-axillary sentinel nodes and to determine the implications of this phenomenon. A total of 549 breast cancer patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy after intratumoural injection of 99mTc-nanocolloid. The sentinel node was intraoperatively identified with the aid of intratumoural administered patent blue dye and a gamma-ray detection probe. Histopathological examination of sentinel nodes included step-sectioning at six levels and immunohistochemical staining. A sentinel node outside level I or II of the axilla was found in 149 patients (27%): internal mammary sentinel nodes in 86 patients, other non-axillary sentinel nodes in 44 and both internal mammary and other non-axillary sentinel nodes in nineteen patients. The intra-operative identification rate was 80%. Internal mammary metastases were found in seventeen patients and metastases in other non-axillary sentinel nodes in ten patients. Staging improved in 13% of patients with non-axillary sentinel lymph nodes and their treatment strategy was changed in 17%. A small proportion of clinically node negative breast cancer patients can be staged more precisely by biopsy of sentinel nodes outside level I and II of the axilla, resulting in additional decision criteria for postoperative regional or systemic therapy

Clinical relevance of sentinel lymph nodes outside the axilla in patients with breast cancer

Background: Lymphatic mapping in patients with breast cancer can reveal sentinel lymph nodes that are not located at level I-II of the axilla. Little is known about the clinical relevance of these nodes. Methods: Some 113 consecutive patients with clinical stage T1-3N0M0 breast cancer were studied. Based on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, sentinel node biopsy was performed guided by a gamma probe and patent blue dye. All sentinel nodes that were visible on lymphoscintigraphy were sought. Pathological examination of the sentinel nodes included step-sections and staining with CAM 5.2. Axillary node dissection was performed regardless of sentinel lymph node status. Results: Twenty-one (19 per cent) of 113 patients had sentinel lymph nodes outside level I-II of the axilla, mostly in the internal mammary chain. Twenty-two of the 30 sentinel nodes at these sites were harvested. Three patients had sentinel nodes only outside the axilla. Four other patients had metastases outside the axilla. This changed postoperative treatment in three patients. No postoperative complication occurred. Conclusion: Sentinel lymph nodes outside level I-II of the axilla were present in 19 per cent of patients with breast cancer in this series. Biopsy of these nodes was technically demanding but was performed without additional morbidity. The clinical impact was limited; treatment changed in only 3 per cent

Axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) without further axillary dissection in patients with sentinel node-negative breast carcinoma appears to be a safe procedure to ensure locoregional control. During a median follow-up of 35 months the false-negative rate was 1% in our study population of 185 patients. Background. The objective of this prospective study is to provide data on follow-up of patients with primary operable breast carcinoma staged with SLNB without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were tumour-negative. Methods. One hundred and eighty-five patients were enrolled. Preoperative dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy were performed; both a vital blue dye and a gamma detection probe were used intraolperatively. Patients with tumour-positive SLNs received completion ALND or if no SLNs could be identified. All patients were monitored according to regional follow-up protocols. Results. The SLNs were identified in 179 out of the 185 patients. In 73 patients the SLNs were tumour-positive and in 106 patients tumour-negative. The median follow-up was 35 months (range 17-59). In one SLN-negative patient an axillary recurrence occurred 26 months after the SLNB (false-negative rate: 1%). Conclusions. SLNB without ALND appears to be a safe procedure to ensure locoregional control in SLN-negative breast carcinoma, if carried out by an experienced team. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All, rights reserved

Sentinel node biopsy as a surgical staging method for solid cancers

The sentinel node is the first lymph node that drains a primary tumour. If this lymphatic drainage occurs in a step-wise fashion, this lymph node reflects the pathological status of the remaining lymph node basin. The day before the operation, a total dose of 60 MBq 99mTc nanocolloid is injected around the primary tumour for lymphoscintigraphy. On the day of surgery, 1 ml of blue dye is injected around the primary tumour to facilitate sentinel lymph node detection. After making a small incision over the regional lymph node region, the sentinel node can be detected using a hand-held gamma ray detection probe; the sentinel lymph node and the afferent lymphatic vessels will be stained blue. Sentinel node biopsy has proved useful for malignant melanoma, breast cancer, penile cancer, vulvar cancer, Merkel cell carcinoma and thyroid cancer. New studies are described on breast cancer and malignant melanoma. Gamma-probe-guided localization of radiolabelled lymph nodes can direct the surgeon non-invasively to the exact location of the sentinel node. Once localized with a gamma probe, it is quick and easy to remove the sentinel node through a small incision. Discriminating the node from other tissue can be aided by blue dye which stains the lymph node. It appears that both radioactivity and blue dye are complementary for locating the sentinel node. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved

Is sentinel node biopsy beneficial in melanoma patients? A report on 200 patients with cutaneous melanoma

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and clinical impact of sentinel node biopsy, including preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative lymphatic mapping in patients with cutaneous melanoma of the head, neck, trunk or extremities. Methods: Two hundred patients (103 women, 97 men), median age 57 (range 21-86) years with cutaneous melanoma greater than or equal to1.0mm Breslow thickness and clinically negative lymph nodes participated in a single institutional prospective study from May 1995 to January 2000. Primary melanoma sites included: 22 head and neck (11%), 67 trunk (34%), 29 upper extremity (14%) and 82 lower extremity (41%). The median Breslow thickness was 2.5 (range 1.0-20.0) mm. Preoperative dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative blue dye and a gamma detection probe were used. If histological examination with HE or IHC showed metastases, therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) was performed. Results: Sentinel node(s) could be identified in 197 patients (99%); 393 sentinel nodes (mean: 2.0 per patient, range 1-7) were removed from 241 basins. Three procedures failed in the head and neck region. In 167 patients, the sentinel nodes were both blue and radioactive (85%); in 26 patients, they were only radioactive (13%) and in four patients only blue (2%). In total, 150 patients had tumour-negative sentinel nodes (76%). During a median follow-up of 47 (range 24-79) months, nodal recurrence in a negative mapped basin was documented in six patients of which isolated recurrence was in two patients and recurrence together with locoregional recurrence in four patients (false negative rate 6/54 = 11%). Estimated three-year recurrence-free survival in the node-negative patients and nodepositive patients was 83 and 66% respectively (P <0.05). The overall survival at three years was 92 and 73% respectively (P <0.05). Conclusion: Sentinel node biopsy provides accurate staging and important prognostic information. The final place of sentinel node biopsy is still undefined, and therefore sentinel node biopsy is still considered as an experimental surgical staging procedure. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd