28 research outputs found

    Automatic Robust Neurite Detection and Morphological Analysis of Neuronal Cell Cultures in High-content Screening

    Get PDF
    Cell-based high content screening (HCS) is becoming an important and increasingly favored approach in therapeutic drug discovery and functional genomics. In HCS, changes in cellular morphology and biomarker distributions provide an information-rich profile of cellular responses to experimental treatments such as small molecules or gene knockdown probes. One obstacle that currently exists with such cell-based assays is the availability of image processing algorithms that are capable of reliably and automatically analyzing large HCS image sets. HCS images of primary neuronal cell cultures are particularly challenging to analyze due to complex cellular morphology. Here we present a robust method for quantifying and statistically analyzing the morphology of neuronal cells in HCS images. The major advantages of our method over existing software lie in its capability to correct non-uniform illumination using the contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization method; segment neuromeres using Gabor-wavelet texture analysis; and detect faint neurites by a novel phase-based neurite extraction algorithm that is invariant to changes in illumination and contrast and can accurately localize neurites. Our method was successfully applied to analyze a large HCS image set generated in a morphology screen for polyglutaminemediated neuronal toxicity using primary neuronal cell cultures derived from embryos of a Drosophila Huntington’s Disease (HD) model.National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant

    Oestrogen effects on urine concentrating response in young women

    No full text
    Oestrogen lowers the plasma osmotic threshold for arginine vasopressin (AVP) release but without commensurate changes in renal concentrating response, suggesting oestrogen (OE2) may lower renal sensitivity to AVP. Ten women (23 ± 1 years) received a gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa), leuprolide acetate, to suppress OE2 for 35 days, and then added OE2 (two patches each delivering 0.1 mg day−1) on days 32–35. On days 28 and 35 we tested blood and renal water and sodium (Na+) regulation during stepwise 60 min AVP infusions (10, 35, 100, 150 and 200 ÎŒu (kg body weight)−1 Pitressin). Plasma OE2 concentration increased from 19 ± 4 to 152 ± 3 pg ml−1 and plasma progesterone concentration was unchanged (1.0 ± 0.4 and 0.7 ± 0.1 ng ml−1) for GnRHa and OE2 administration, respectively. Standard log plots of plasma AVP concentration ([AVP]P) vs. urine osmolality (OsmU) were fitted to a sigmoidal curve, and EC50 was determined by non-linear regression curve fitting of concentration-response data. OsmU rose exponentially during AVP infusions, but hormone treatments did not affect EC50 (3.3 ± 0.07 and 3.1 ± 0.6 pg ml−1, for GnRHa and OE2, respectively). However, the urine osmolality increase was greater within the physiological range (˜2.5−3.4 pg ml−1[AVP]P) during OE2 treatment. Throughout most of the AVP infusion, the rate of clearance of AVP from plasma (PCRAVP) was increased during OE2 (45.5 ml (kg body weight)−1 min−1) compared to GnRHa administration (33.1 ml (kg body weight)−1 min−1; mean for the 100–200 ÎŒu (kg body weight)−1 infusion rates). The rate of renal free water clearance (CH2O) was similar between hormone treatments. Sodium excretion fell during OE2 administration due to greater distal tubular sodium reabsorption. Despite more rapid PCRAVP, renal concentrating response to graded AVP infusions was unaffected by oestrogen treatment suggesting oestrogen does not affect overall renal sensitivity to AVP. However, OE2 may increase renal fluid retention within a physiological range of AVP

    Optimal use and interpretation of the aldosterone renin ratio to detect aldosterone excess in hypertension

    No full text
    With the introduction of the aldosterone/renin ratio as a screening test, the detection rate of primary aldosteronism has increased considerably. Nevertheless, no consensus has so far been reached regarding the cutoff points, operating characteristics or indeed even the reference values for reporting the aldosterone/renin ratio using plasma active renin (ng/l or mU/l) measured by immunoradiometric assay. We review the characteristics of this ratio in normal individuals, essential hypertension and primary hyperaldosteronism in an attempt to reach an agreement regarding its optimum use and interpretation - both using the renin activity or concentration. It seems that the optimal cutoff for patients with primary aldosteronism is above 30 ng/dl per mug/l/h or 800 pmol/l per mug/l/h or 130 pmol/ng or 80 pmol/mU. We explore enhancing measures such as captopril loading or use with a plasma aldosterone cutoff as well as pitfalls with the test such as confounding medications or the need for confirmatory testing. For the latter, demonstration of autonomous aldosterone production via salt loading is widely used, but may not be most advantageous and may even be contraindicated in patients with severe hypertension. The renin stimulation test may be an alternative being safe, well tolerated, and cost effective
    corecore