Peramorphic males and extreme sexual dimorphism in Monodelphis dimidiata (Didelphidae)

The southern short-tailed opossum, Monodelphisdimidiata, is a species known not only for its semelparouslife cycle, but also for the extreme sexualdimorphism of adults, where males are not only larger, butalso have distinctive morphological characters in theirskull. Using geometric morphometrics and a suite of statisticaltests, I analyzed the postweaning ontogeneticdevelopment of this species in order to evaluate the ageclasswhere sexual dimorphism becomes significant and theamount of change exhibited by both sexes. My resultsshowed that M. dimidiata partly follows the ontogeneticpattern described for didelphids by previous authors. Thecharacter that escapes the general pattern is rostral length,which becomes shorter instead of lengthening throughoutthe development. This change could be related to anincrement in the bite force in the anterior part of the dentition.The amount of sexual dimorphism found for thisspecies is larger than the reported previously for otherAmerican marsupials, and I also found a higher rate ofgrowth in males at the attaining of sexual maturity. Basedon my results and the information available for otherdidelphids, I can suggest that M. dimidiata males undergothrough a process of hypermorphosis, resulting in aperamorphic condition. It is possible that the extremesexual dimorphism present in this species is related toreproductive success, specially taking into account theirsemelparous life cycle.Fil: Chemisquy, Maria Amelia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia"; Argentin

Threatened conservation scientists: the aftermath of an eye-opening publication on rewilding

‘Rewilding’ is a nature conservation strategy gaining prominence worldwide. Established in the Northern Hemisphere, rewilding initiatives have increasingly been proposed in Argentina, but their relative merits, feasibility of implementation and accountability have lacked adequate analysis and discussion. Recently, 125 scientists and practitioners wrote an article to assess the justification and methods of current rewilding initiatives in Argentina. Rather than engaging in a constructive debate with the scientific community, one of the major organizations behind these initiatives threatened to sue the authors for libel. We strongly reject this baseless threat. Scientific discussions around this and other conservation topics of societal concern should be addressed in an academic context and conducted in a respectful and rational manner, embracing the right of scientists and practitioners to express themselves freely and without fear of coercion