Association between Deepwater Horizon oil spill response and cleanup work experiences and lung function

Introduction: Oil spill response and cleanup (OSRC) workers had potentially stressful experiences during mitigation efforts following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster. Smelling chemicals; skin or clothing contact with oil; heat stress; handling oily plants/wildlife or dead animal recovery; and/or being out of regular work may have posed a risk to worker respiratory health through psychological stress mechanisms. Objective: To evaluate the association between six potentially stressful oil spill experiences and lung function among OSRC workers 1–3 years following the Deepwater Horizon disaster, while controlling for primary oil spill inhalation hazards and other potential confounders. Methods: Of 6811 GuLF STUDY participants who performed OSRC work and completed a quality spirometry test, 4806 provided information on all exposures and confounders. We carried out complete case analysis and used multiple imputation to assess risk among the larger sample. Potentially stressful work experiences were identified from an earlier study of these workers. The lung function parameters of interest include the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1, mL), the forced vital capacity (FVC, mL) and the ratio (FEV1/FVC, %). Results: On average, participants in the analytic sample completed spirometry tests 1.7 years after the spill. Among workers with at least 2 acceptable FEV1 and FVC curves, workers with jobs that involved oily plants/wildlife or dead animal recovery had lower values for FEV1 (Mean difference: −53 mL, 95% CI: −84, −22), FVC (Mean difference: −45 mL, 95% CI: −81, −9) and FEV1/FVC (Mean difference: −0.44%, 95% CI: −0.80, −0.07) compared to unexposed workers in analyses using multiple imputation. Conclusions: Workers involved in handling oily plants/wildlife or dead animal recovery had lower lung function than unexposed workers after accounting for other OSRC inhalation hazards

Exposure to Oil Spill Chemicals and Lung Function in Deepwater Horizon Disaster Response Workers

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between total hydrocarbon (THC) exposures attributed to oil spill clean-up work and lung function 1 to 3 years after the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) disaster. Methods: We used data from the GuLF STUDY, a large cohort of adults who worked on response to the DWH disaster and others who were safety trained but did not work. We analyzed data from 6288 workers with two acceptable spirometry tests. We estimated THC exposure levels with a job exposure matrix. We evaluated lung function using the forced expiratory volume in 1second (FEV 1; mL), the forced vital capacity (FVC; mL), and the FEV 1 /FVC ratio (%). Results: Lung function measures did not differ by THC exposure levels among clean-up workers. Conclusion: We did not observe an association between THC exposure and lung function among clean-up workers 1 to 3 years following the DWH disaster

Lung Function in Oil Spill Response Workers 1-3 Years after the Deepwater Horizon Disaster

Background: Little is known about the effects of inhalation exposures on lung function among workers involved in the mitigation of oil spills. Our objective was to determine the relationship between oil spill response work and lung function 1-3 years after the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) disaster. Methods: We evaluated spirometry for 7,775 adults living in the Gulf states who either participated in DWH response efforts (workers) or received safety training but were not hired (nonworkers). At an enrollment interview, we collected detailed work histories including information on potential exposure to dispersants and burning oil/gas. We assessed forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1; mL), forced vital capacity (FVC; mL), and the ratio (FEV 1 /FVC%) for differences by broad job classes and exposure to dispersants or burning oil/gas using multivariable linear and modified Poisson regression. Results: We found no differences between workers and nonworkers. Among workers, we observed a small decrement in FEV 1 (Beta, -71 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], -127 to -14) in decontamination workers compared with support workers. Workers with high potential exposure to burning oil/gas had reduced lung function compared with unexposed workers: FEV 1 (Beta, -183 mL; 95% CI, -316 to -49) and FEV 1 /FVC (Beta, -1.93%; 95% CI, -3.50 to -0.36), and an elevated risk of having a FEV 1 /FVC in the lowest tertile (prevalence ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.92). Conclusions: While no differences in lung function were found between workers and nonworkers, lung function was reduced among decontamination workers and workers with high exposure to burning oil/gas compared with unexposed workers

Priorities for Bolstering Public Health Resilience in the Context of Climate Change in Dominica and Puerto Rico

Caribbean small island developing states are highly exposed to climate change impacts. Incorporating weather and climate information into public health decisions can promote resilience to climate change’s adverse health effects, but regionally it is not common practice. We implemented a project to enhance dialogue between climate and public health specialists in Puerto Rico and Dominica. First, we conducted environmental scans of public health vulnerability in the context of weather and climate for both islands. Then, we convened stakeholders to discuss the scan results and identify priorities for climate and health. A shared priority was increasing climate and health knowledge; thus, we developed several educational initiatives. In this viewpoint, we discuss our process for conducting environmental scans, building capacity and partnerships, and translating knowledge-to-action around climate and health. © 2022 The Author(s).Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]